The New York Times often covers Trump critically in their headline stories. They may focus on controversial statements he makes or actions that are seen as divisive. For instance, if he makes a statement about immigration that is seen as extreme, it will likely be in a headline.
They also cover his political moves. When Trump was in office, if he proposed a new policy, like building the border wall, the New York Times headline stories would not only report on the proposal but also analyze its feasibility, cost, and the political implications. They might look at how Congress responded to his ideas and how it affected his approval ratings. Their coverage is comprehensive and aims to provide a full picture of Trump's actions and their consequences from their editorial perspective.
One could be about his political rallies. The New York Times might headline a story on Trump's rallies highlighting the large crowds he draws and the key policy points he emphasizes during those events.
I think the editors also consider the interests of their readership. They know what their readers are likely to be interested in, and they choose stories that will attract attention. So, stories that are unique or have an element of surprise may also be selected for the headline.
One example could be the misrepresentation of Trump's economic policies. The New York Times might have painted a more negative picture than was actually the case. Trump's tax cuts, for instance, were often criticized in their reporting as only benefiting the rich, while in reality they also had positive impacts on small businesses and job creation.
One major story was about Trump's tax returns. The New York Times managed to obtain and report on details of his tax situation which had been a mystery for a long time. It provided insights into his business dealings and financial status.
The New York Times covered their interactions in a comprehensive way. They reported on official meetings, for example. These reports included details about the topics discussed, like arms control, Syria, and other geopolitical issues.
The stories on his actions during the 2020 election influenced public perception greatly. A large portion of the public became more aware of the potential threats to the democratic process. This led to increased political divide, with some believing Trump was unjustly targeted and others believing he was indeed trying to subvert the election.
The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.
The New York Times might break stories related to Trump's business dealings. There could be investigations into how his companies operate, potential conflicts of interest, or any new partnerships or financial transactions. Also, stories about his rallies and the reactions they generate among his supporters and the general public are possible breaking news.
The New York Times often covers sustainability stories by reporting on environmental initiatives. For example, it might write about new renewable energy projects in different regions. It also covers stories related to sustainable living, like urban farming initiatives in cities. Additionally, it may report on the impact of big corporations' sustainability efforts or lack thereof.
The New York Times likely interviewed survivors directly. They would have asked them about their experiences during the attack.