Fiction. The movie 'After Earth' has elements like evolved and extremely dangerous animals, a desolate Earth environment that are not real in the current scientific understanding. It's a fictional story set in a future world that has deviated far from our present - day Earth in terms of both ecology and the state of humanity.
Well, it's fiction. Consider the technology shown in the movie. For example, the spaceships and the way they travel through space seem more like products of creative license rather than real - world science. Also, the idea of a single father - son duo being the only hope for humanity on a post - apocalyptic Earth is a very fictional concept that is designed to create an exciting and emotional story, rather than something that has a basis in scientific fact.
It's fiction. 'After Earth' is a science - fiction movie that presents a post - apocalyptic Earth scenario which is not based on current scientific facts but rather on creative imagination for the sake of entertainment.
Fiction. There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of a hollow earth. Modern seismology, for example, shows that the earth has a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a mantle, and a crust. These layers are well - studied through various methods like earthquake wave analysis. The idea of a hollow earth is more of a science - fiction concept that has no basis in real geological knowledge.
It's fiction. There is no scientific evidence to support the idea of a hollow earth. Modern seismology, for example, shows that the Earth has a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a thick mantle, and a crust. All the data from deep - earth studies indicate a solid, layered structure rather than a hollow one.
Science is fact. It relies on systematic methods to understand the natural world. Through research and verification, scientific knowledge is established and constantly refined. Unlike fiction, which is imaginative and not bound by real-world constraints.
The extreme changes in Earth's ecosystem shown in 'After Earth' are fictional. Real - world ecosystems change gradually over long periods of time, not as suddenly as depicted in the movie.
It's fiction. There's no concrete scientific evidence to prove that aliens have actually visited our planet.
It's fact. There are numerous genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the market today that can be called 'frankenfood' in a sense. These are created through scientific techniques that combine genes from different organisms. They are real and have various purposes such as increased resistance to pests or improved nutritional value.
I think 'science fact fiction' is a concept that blurs the line between what we know as pure science and pure fiction. It's not just about making up wild ideas but using real scientific knowledge as a foundation. In movies like 'Interstellar', they used real - life theories about black holes and time dilation to create a fictional story of space exploration. This is a great example of science fact fiction where the science facts are integral to the fictional plot.
It's mostly science fiction. While it's based on some real scientific knowledge and concepts, like the challenges of living on Mars, the story as a whole is fictional. For example, the idea of a lone astronaut surviving on Mars through his ingenuity is a fictional scenario created for the story.
Peabody is likely a fictional creation. Most stories or concepts named Peabody that I'm familiar with are found in works of fiction.
Well, it varies. Some science fiction concepts are pure imagination, but others are based on real scientific theories and extrapolations. So, it's a mixed bag. Sometimes, the line between the two is blurry as scientific progress makes what was once fiction more feasible.