Definitely not. 'Kidnapped' implies a non - consensual and often violent act, and when combined with 'erotic' it crosses the line into disturbing and unacceptable territory. Most literary communities would not consider this an appropriate or worthy genre.
No. Such a genre involves unethical and inappropriate themes. Literature should focus on positive values, moral stories, and themes that promote human growth and understanding, rather than something that may involve non - consensual and immoral situations.
No. This kind of 'genre' goes against basic moral and ethical standards. We should encourage literature that respects the dignity and rights of individuals, and a 'kidnapped erotic story' clearly violates these principles. It may also have a negative impact on readers, especially in terms of shaping their values and views on relationships.
Definitely not. The idea of a 'gay to straight erotic story' is inappropriate as it can contribute to the idea that being gay is something that needs to be 'changed' or is abnormal. Sexual orientation is an inherent part of a person and should not be used as a basis for creating inappropriate and potentially harmful erotic content. Literature should promote acceptance and understanding rather than such inappropriate concepts.
Definitely not. Literature is supposed to enrich our minds, inspire our thoughts, and touch our hearts. 'Big ass erotic story' represents a form of content that is more about satisfying base desires rather than promoting any positive cultural or intellectual values. It is not a genre that should be considered appropriate in the realm of literature.
No. Erotic fiction in general often contains inappropriate and vulgar content, and the term'sissy' used in this context might also carry some offensive or discriminatory connotations. Literature should focus on positive values, good stories, and meaningful themes.
No. Erotic fiction in general often contains inappropriate and vulgar content, and when combined with the concept of 'pregnant' which can be a very sensitive and private topic, it is not suitable for mainstream literature. It may also violate ethical and moral norms.
Definitely not. Military is about discipline, heroism, and national security. Erotic content has no place in this context. Such a combination would be disrespectful to the military personnel and the values they uphold. It also goes against the general standards of good taste and moral propriety in literature.
Definitely not. It can be considered a form of exploitation. The police are symbols of justice and safety, and creating 'erotic fiction' around them is disrespectful. It can also create a negative impact on how the public perceives the police force.
In general, it is not an appropriate genre. Most literary works aim to educate, inspire, or at least present healthy human relationships. The combination of financial domination and erotic elements often leads to content that can be demeaning, promote non - consensual power relationships, and go against the principles of respect and equality that are fundamental in good literature.
In general, it is not. The 'drugged' aspect can give wrong messages about drug use, and 'erotic' content may objectify characters. Mainstream literature aims to be inclusive, educational, and thought - provoking in a positive way, which this combination does not seem to support.
Definitely not. The idea of using the figure of a priest in an erotic context, regardless of sexual orientation, is not acceptable. Priests are symbols of religious leadership and faith, and this kind of genre would violate the ethical boundaries within a religious and general moral community.
No. Erotic fiction involving such non - human or semi - human characters often contains inappropriate and unethical content, which is not suitable for general literary promotion.