Well, one important criterion is world - building. A great medieval fantasy novel should create a vivid and believable world that feels like it could have existed in the Middle Ages. For example, 'The Lord of the Rings' does this really well with its detailed maps, languages, and cultures. Another criterion is the characters. They should be complex and engaging, like in 'A Game of Thrones' where you have so many different characters with their own motives and backstories. Plot is also crucial. It should be exciting and full of twists and turns, much like the story in 'The Name of the Wind'.
The best comics often have a unique plot that keeps you hooked, top-notch illustrations that bring the scenes to life, and characters you can really connect with. Also, how well it resonates with a wide audience can be a factor.
In my opinion, the ability to create memorable characters is key for the best literary novel. Characters that feel real and three - dimensional, with their own flaws and virtues, can draw readers in. Additionally, the novel's relevance to different time periods and cultures can be a factor. If it can speak to a wide range of people across time and space, it's likely a great literary work. And of course, the impact it has on the literary world, whether it starts new trends or challenges existing norms.
Well, one criterion could be the level of horror it induces. For example, 'The Boogeyman' is really scary as it plays on the common fear of the unknown lurking in the dark. If a story can make your skin crawl, it might be considered great.
One of the best could be 'The Lord of the Rings' by J.R.R. Tolkien. It has a richly detailed medieval - like world, with different races like hobbits, elves, and dwarves. The story is epic, following Frodo's journey to destroy the One Ring. It has influenced countless other works in the fantasy genre and has a huge following even today.
As a fan of online literature, I won't make subjective comments on movies because movies are an art form and everyone has their own preferences and standards. However, generally speaking, a bad film might be generally considered bad for the following reasons: 1. The plot is boring or cliché, lacking creativity and imagination; 2. Poor character performance, lack of emotional depth and acting skills; 3. The special effects are rough and the visual effects are not good; 4. Music and sound effects are not attractive; 5. The editing was chaotic and lacked cohesiveness; 6. There are logical loopholes or unreasonable places in the plot; 7. The relationship between the characters is chaotic and lacks rationality and depth; 8. Poor setting and design, lacking in beauty and artistry. Of course, these were just some common reasons. Every movie had its own unique characteristics. Different people might have different views on the same movie.
Sure. For the best ones, a strong plot with an interesting mystery is key. Like in 'The Speckled Band', the mystery keeps you on the edge of your seat. Also, good character development, especially of Holmes and Watson, is important. In the worst, convoluted or uninteresting plots are a big minus. For example, if a story has a mystery that's too easy to solve or just doesn't make sense, like some of the more obscure Holmes adventures, it can be considered bad.
I think 'A Song of Ice and Fire' by George R.R. Martin is a great medieval fantasy novel. It has complex characters, political intrigue, and a vast world. The storylines are full of twists and turns. There are multiple POV characters which give a comprehensive view of the fictional world of Westeros and Essos.
One of the best is 'The Lord of the Rings' by J.R.R. Tolkien. It has a richly detailed Middle - earth filled with elves, dwarves, hobbits and more. The epic battles between good and evil, and the journey to destroy the One Ring make it a classic. Another great one is 'A Song of Ice and Fire' by George R.R. Martin. It has complex characters and a vast, gritty world full of political intrigue and power struggles.
The criteria for determining plagiarism in web novels were complicated and required a comprehensive consideration of many factors. Generally speaking, the criteria for determining plagiarism in online novels included the following aspects: 1. Degree of similarity: The plot, characters, scenes, and other elements in the online novel must be as similar as possible, otherwise it may be identified as plagiarism. 2. Direct quote: If a web novel directly quoted the plot, characters, scenes, and other elements of other works without appropriate adaptation and processing, it may also be considered plagiarism. 3. Time span: If the plot and content of the online novel have a large time span with another work, such as similar content appearing in different works, it may also be identified as plagiarism. 4. Evidence of similarity: To determine that a web novel is plagiarized, there must be sufficient evidence such as color palettes, comparison charts, etc. 5. Subjective intent: The author's subjective intent is also an important factor in determining plagiarism. If the author has obvious plagiarism intent or consciously introduced the content of other works into his own work, it may be considered plagiarism. It should be noted that determining plagiarism in online novels is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive consideration of many factors, and different courts and legal systems may have different standards.
'Uprooted' by Naomi Novik is another great one. It has a medieval - style setting with a young girl who has a special connection to a powerful wizard. The forest in the story is full of magic and danger, and the relationship between the two main characters is complex and interesting, making it a great read in the medieval fantasy genre.