One main indicator that it's fiction is the presence of fictional characters. If it was fact, it would be mainly about real historical figures. Also, the plotlines often seem too dramatized to be real historical events.
It's fiction. The 'Shogun Series' is a work of creative storytelling, not based on real historical events in a completely literal sense. It uses elements of historical settings like feudal Japan but weaves in fictional characters and plotlines for entertainment purposes.
In 'Boys in the Boat', one of the main ways to spot fact from fiction is by looking at the rowing events themselves. The actual races, the rules, and the competition structure were real. So that's a fact. On the other hand, the emotions and conflicts within the team might be exaggerated for dramatic effect, which would be a fictional aspect. Also, the descriptions of the boats and the rowing techniques should be based on historical facts, but any added drama or suspense around these elements could be fictional.
One main theme is honor. Samurai in these fictions are often bound by a strict code of honor. For example, they might choose death over dishonor.
One key indicator is the level of detail. In facts, there are usually specific details. For instance, a father talking about his first car will mention the make, model, etc. For a student, if it's a fact about a project, they'll say what materials they used. Fiction often lacks such details or has over - the - top, unrealistic ones. Another is the purpose. Facts are to inform, while fiction is mainly for entertainment.
Evidence is a big one. If there's physical evidence, like archaeological findings for a historical event, it's a fact. In fiction, there's no such evidence. For example, we have fossils as evidence for the existence of dinosaurs, which is a fact, while a dragon in a story has no such evidence.
Well, it could be about separating the real historical facts regarding shoguns from the fictional stories. Maybe it aims to clarify misunderstandings in popular culture where shoguns are often misrepresented.
It could be either. There are books and documentaries with similar titles. Without more context, it's hard to say for sure.
Probably a lot about shogunate history. Maybe some tales of famous shoguns and how much of what we think we know is true or false.
Well, one main difference could be in the pacing. In the series, they might have to adjust the pacing to fit the time constraints of each episode. The novel, on the other hand, can take its time to develop the story and characters at a more leisurely pace. Another difference could be in the visual representation. The series shows you what the characters and settings look like directly, while in the novel you have to form your own mental images based on the author's descriptions.
One can start by reading reliable historical books on the shogunate period. These will provide the factual basis.