One main difference could be in the level of glamour. The movie might have enhanced the glamour factor for entertainment purposes compared to the real story. Also, the movie likely simplified some complex aspects of the real relationship.
The movie 'Pretty Woman' is a fictionalized version of the true story. In the movie, the relationship between Vivian and Edward seems to develop more smoothly and in a more romanticized way. In the true story, there were probably more obstacles and less of the Hollywood - style magic. The movie also made Vivian's character more likeable and relatable in a traditional sense, while in the true story, the character she was based on might have had more flaws and a more complex personality. Also, the movie's ending was more of a feel - good, happily - ever - after type, which may not have been exactly how the real - life situation panned out.
Well, the movie 'Pretty Woman' is a highly fictionalized version of the true story. In the movie, everything seems to work out perfectly in the end. The couple rides off into the sunset, so to speak. But in the true story, there were probably many more obstacles and less of a clear - cut happy ending. The movie also made the male lead, Edward, more of a heroic figure. In the real story, he may not have been as chivalrous or as perfect as he was made out to be in the movie. And the character of Vivian in the movie is very much a Hollywood - style creation, with her beauty and charm being over - emphasized compared to what might have been the reality in the true story.
Well, in the true story, it was probably less glamorous. The real - life situation might not have had the same kind of Cinderella - like transformation as in the movie. The movie made the relationship seem more of a fairytale with the big romantic moments. Also, in the real story, the social and economic disparities might have been more complex and not as neatly resolved as in the movie. The movie streamlined a lot of the real - life messiness to create a more palatable and entertaining story for the audience.
Well, the movie might have some minor dramatizations for the sake of entertainment. But overall, it stays very close to the true story. Maybe the timelines are a bit compressed in the movie.
No, it's not. 'Pretty Woman' is a fictional romantic comedy.
The movie 'The Revenant' takes some liberties with the true story. In the real story, the relationships between characters might have been more complex and less black - and - white as portrayed in the movie. The movie might have focused more on the revenge aspect, while in the true story, Hugh Glass's survival was likely driven by more than just revenge. There could have been a greater variety of day - to - day survival challenges in the true story that the movie didn't fully capture, as it was more focused on creating a visually and emotionally engaging cinematic experience.
In the real story, there was no such over - the - top action as in the movie. The movie shows Rambo taking on huge numbers of enemies alone, which is a big exaggeration. Also, the real - life inspiration was more about the emotional and social struggles of veterans rather than just physical combat like in the movie.
Well, in the true story, the real elephant was just a large and well - known elephant. In Dumbo, the main character can fly with his ears. That's a huge difference. Also, the movie has a lot of made - up characters like the crows that befriend Dumbo. In the true story, there were no such magical or fictional elements. The movie focuses a lot on Dumbo's journey of self - discovery and acceptance, which may not have been part of the real elephant's story.
In the movie, there may be more of a focus on certain characters' internal struggles, like Ethan's complex feelings towards the Native Americans. In the true story, the focus might have been more on the actual search and the events surrounding it. Also, the movie might simplify some of the real - life political and social aspects that were involved in the original incident.
The movie 'Man on Fire' may have altered some of the timelines compared to the true story. In the real events, the sequence of events leading up to the rescue or revenge might have been different. Also, the movie might have combined multiple real - life characters into one for the sake of simplicity and a more straightforward narrative. The true story probably had more complex and less - clear - cut aspects in terms of the motives and actions of the people involved. And the movie likely enhanced the heroics of the main character for more cinematic appeal.
One main difference could be in the characters' backstories. In the movie, they might be more elaborated for dramatic effect. For example, the protagonist's past traumas might be more fictionalized.