A few suggest that the political and philosophical ideas in the plays are too sophisticated for Shakespeare. They believe someone like Edward de Vere, who was involved in court politics, would be more likely to have written them. But Shakespeare was living in a time of great intellectual ferment. He was exposed to different ideas in London, and he had the genius to incorporate and develop these ideas in his plays. The fact that his plays were so popular during his lifetime also strongly suggests that he was the true author.
One piece of evidence some people point to is Shakespeare's relatively humble educational background. They think someone with a more extensive formal education, like Francis Bacon, would be more likely to have written such complex works. Another is the lack of original manuscripts in Shakespeare's handwriting. However, many scholars refute these points. Just because his education was not as formal as some others doesn't mean he couldn't be a great writer. And the lack of original manuscripts could be due to the passage of time and the normal handling of theater documents in that era.
There is a lack of archaeological evidence for some of the specific events described in the stories. For example, some of the locations and the actions that are supposed to have taken place in those locations don't have corresponding archaeological finds.
There are some theories that suggest other people might have written the works attributed to Shakespeare. One theory is that Christopher Marlowe could have been involved. Some believe that Marlowe faked his death in 1593 and continued to write under Shakespeare's name. Another possibility is that it was a group of playwrights and intellectuals who worked together to create those masterpieces. However, the mainstream view still holds that Shakespeare was the author, as there is a significant amount of evidence supporting his authorship, including contemporary records and the consistency of the writing style in the plays and sonnets.
Her rather one - dimensional personality could be evidence. She often just reacts passively to events around her instead of taking more proactive stances which might not be in line with what a well - written character in fanfiction should be like.
One evidence is the high unemployment rate. Despite growth figures, a large number of educated youth are jobless. Another is the poor state of rural infrastructure. If growth was real and widespread, rural areas would have better roads, electricity, etc. Also, the lack of improvement in the health and education indices relative to growth numbers indicates something is amiss.
In the 'Hermione is a descendant of Morgana fanfiction', one possible evidence could be the similarities in their personalities. Morgana was often portrayed as a strong - willed and independent woman, and Hermione also has these traits. Additionally, the way Hermione sometimes challenges the established norms in the wizarding world, much like Morgana did in her time, could be seen as a link. There might also be a secret magical bloodline that has been hidden for generations, and certain magical signs or powers that Hermione exhibits that are unique to Morgana's descendants.
Well, it depends on the specific fanfiction. Some fanfictions might show it through a special chakra inheritance. Tobirama was known for his powerful water - based jutsu and his intelligence. If Naruto is his descendant, the fanfiction might give Naruto some new abilities related to Tobirama's, like a more advanced form of water jutsu or a strategic mind similar to Tobirama's. This could be evidence within the fanfiction's plot.
One piece of evidence is the mental health crisis that seemed to be exacerbated during lockdowns. There were increased reports of anxiety and depression among the population. Also, the fact that the transition back to normal life after lockdowns was not seamless. There were issues with getting the economy back on track, re - opening businesses fully, and getting people back to work. All these aspects provide evidence for the claim that New Zealand is not a lockdown success story.
Shakespeare was a man of the theater. His works were meant to be seen and heard, not read in the way novels are. The Elizabethan era had a rich theater culture. He was writing for specific acting companies and the needs of the stage. Novels require a different kind of pacing and description, and Shakespeare's skills were more attuned to the dynamic and visual nature of plays.
Well, during Shakespeare's time, the popularity and demand for plays were much higher than novels. Also, the cultural and literary context might not have encouraged him to venture into novel-writing.
There might be a lack of knowledge about the different literary forms among some people. Shakespeare's works are so well - known that someone might assume he also wrote novels. His plays have been so influential that they have been translated, adapted, and reinterpreted in countless ways, which could lead to this kind of misperception. But the fact remains that he was a playwright, not a novelist.