Maybe they all feel strongly about the story and believe their version would be more interesting or accurate. Different people might have different creative ideas or emotional attachments to the story elements.
Often, it's because everyone wants their voice to be heard and their vision to be brought to life. They might think they have a better understanding of the characters or plot, leading to the argument over who gets to tell the story.
People might argue over who gets to tell the story because everyone has their own perspective. For example, in a historical event, different witnesses may want to be the ones to share their version. They believe their account is the most accurate or important. Also, there could be a matter of pride or ownership involved. If it's a family story, a family member may feel they have the right to tell it as they have been more involved in the family traditions related to that story.
Maybe they all think their version would be better or more interesting.
Well, it could be due to different motives. Some might be seeking attention, while others truly believe they can tell the story in the best way. Also, there could be a sense of pride involved, like they have a special connection to the story. For example, if it's a family story, one person might feel they were closer to the events and should be the one to tell it.
A democratic vote among the group could work. Each person presents their case briefly and then everyone votes. This gives everyone a say and ensures a somewhat fair outcome. Another option is to let the person who has the most knowledge about the details of the story tell it first, and then others can add their own bits later if they want.
People do that because they have different expectations and standards for the story's coherence. Some might be more critical and notice logical flaws easily.
Well, sometimes it's because the stories bring comfort or familiarity. Also, they might be easy to remember and share. And for some, they just have a deep emotional connection to those particular tales.
The arguments about realism in fantasy stories occur due to the diverse nature of the audience. Some people are used to a certain level of believability in stories. They may think that even in a fantasy setting, there should be some internal logic, like how magic works or how different species interact. If this logic is not consistent, they consider it a flaw. On the other hand, some fans of fantasy like it when the stories are completely out - there, with no regard for realism. They love the freedom that fantasy offers to create the most absurd and amazing scenarios, and they get frustrated when others try to impose realism on their beloved genre.
Maybe they really love those stories and think they're worth sharing again and again. Or they just can't remember they've already told them.
Maybe they find those stories really interesting or important and want to share them repeatedly.
People tell stories to express themselves. Through stories, they can share their experiences, feelings, and ideas. It's a way to connect with others on an emotional level.