The reason could be that the few facts introduced don't enhance the story but rather make it less engaging. Maybe they don't mesh with the established tone or world of the story.
Well, it might be that the facts don't align with the fictional elements and create a disconnect. Or maybe they are presented too abruptly and break the immersion in the story.
Sometimes facts can disrupt the flow and imagination of a story. If they don't fit well or are presented in a dry way, it can take away from the enjoyment.
This statement suggests that stories can be a form of escapism or entertainment. We might be more interested in the narrative flow, the characters, and the overall mood of a story. If we always insisted on strict factualness, many great stories, such as fairy tales or science - fiction epics, would lose their magic. Facts can be constraining, while a good story allows for creativity and imagination to run wild.
It means that sometimes people prefer a fictional or exaggerated version of a story rather than the version based strictly on facts. They don't want the cold, hard facts to disrupt the interesting or exciting narrative they have in mind.
It basically means that sometimes you should focus on the entertainment or appeal of a story rather than getting too hung up on whether everything is strictly factual.
Hearst could be a reference to the Hearst Corporation, a large media company. They have a long history in media, so perhaps in this context, it's related to their practices or an attitude that was once prevalent within the company.
Sure. In the movie 'Jurassic Park'. There are many scientific inaccuracies. Dinosaurs couldn't actually be re - created in the way shown in the movie with the current technology. But these inaccuracies don't stop the movie from being an amazing story full of adventure and wonder.
It could imply that Hearst (perhaps a media entity or person named Hearst) has an attitude of not allowing facts to disrupt a story that they consider 'good'. Maybe they prioritize the narrative or entertainment value over strict factual accuracy.
He meant that sometimes in storytelling, strict adherence to facts can limit creativity. A good story might be more engaging if it bends or ignores some facts for the sake of entertainment or making a point.
One way is to focus more on the emotions and themes of the story rather than strict facts. For example, if you're writing a love story set in a fictional world, you don't need to worry about the exact geographical or scientific facts of that world.
It could be due to poor plot development. Maybe the story becomes too predictable or has holes in the logic.
It might be due to compression algorithms used by Instagram to save data and speed up loading. This can lead to a reduction in image and video quality.