Not at all. There's no such event in the comics. The characters' interactions and developments don't involve anything like that.
Definitely not. The story doesn't have such a plot. Agatha has no reason or occasion to eat the twins.
Agatha Harkness doesn't eat the twins in the comics. The comic storyline doesn't feature such a disturbing event. It's likely a misconception or rumor.
Agatha Harkness did not eat the twins in the comics. The storylines of the comics don't include such a disturbing event. Usually, the character's actions are in line with the established lore and themes.
Definitely not. In the comics, there's no instance of Agatha eating Billy and Tommy. The characters' interactions and events are completely different.
Agatha didn't eat Billy and Tommy. The comics don't have this storyline. Usually, characters' fates are determined by the overall narrative and character development, not by such extreme events.
In the traditional Superman comics, there's no mention of him having twins. The focus is usually on his solo adventures and interactions with other superheroes.
Sure, Wanda does have twins in the comics. Their names are Billy and Tommy, and they have their own significant storylines and powers.
Well, it depends on which specific comic series you're referring to. In some, Agatha was a prominent character, while in others, she might have had only a cameo or no appearance at all.
Yes, Agatha is in the comics. She plays a significant role in some storylines.
Yes, Agatha is from the comics. She's a well-known character in that universe.
Agatha is usually seen as a villain in the comics. Her powers are often used for nefarious purposes, and she poses a significant threat to the protagonists. But comic interpretations can vary, and some versions might present her in a more complex or sympathetic light.