DC Comics can't be generalized as SJW. It has a rich history and a wide array of content that caters to different tastes and interests. The term SJW is too narrow and inaccurate to describe the complexity of DC Comics' offerings.
Not really. DC Comics has a diverse range of stories and characters, and it's not fair to simply label it as SJW.
No, RWBY and DC Comics have no direct canon connection. They are separate fictional universes.
Not all DC Comics are canon. It depends on various factors like storylines, reboots, and alternate universes.
It's typically regarded as Malcolm Wheeler-Nicholson. He played a crucial role in laying the foundation of DC Comics.
The determination of whether DC Comics heroes are fair use is complex. It involves factors like the purpose of the use, the nature of the work, and the amount used. In many cases, commercial use without permission is not fair.
Superman is often regarded as one of the strongest. He has super strength, speed, and a wide range of powers.
SJW Marvel Comics is struggling quite a bit. The storylines and character developments haven't been well-received by many, leading to a decline in popularity and sales.
DC Comics might be so dark because it aims to present a more realistic and challenging view of the world. It doesn't shy away from showing the harsh consequences of actions and the complexity of human nature.
DC can be classified as science fiction to a large extent. It frequently features superpowers based on scientific explanations, high-tech gadgets, and fictional scientific advancements that shape its storylines.
I don't think so. Saga is more about complex storytelling and character development rather than being labeled as an SJW comic.
No, they're not exactly the same. DC Comics is the original source of the characters and stories, while the DC Universe is a broader platform that includes various media adaptations and related content.