Echo's leg loss in the comics could be attributed to a combination of factors. Maybe there was a trap set by a villain, or it could be that she underestimated an opponent's strength. It's a complex situation that unfolded in the comic's storyline.
Well, from what I remember, it might have been a result of a powerful enemy's attack. Or perhaps it was a risky move she made to save someone and ended up losing her leg in the process.
Well, in the comics, Echo indeed lost her leg. This event had a significant impact on her character development and storyline.
No, she doesn't. Echo remains intact in the comics.
Sure, Echo had a prosthetic leg in the comics. This feature often played a role in her storylines and interactions with other characters.
No, Echo didn't have one leg in the comics.
No, Hawkeye didn't lose a leg in the comics.
Echo didn't have a leg missing in the comics. The character's physical condition was intact.
Hawkeye did not lose his leg in the comics. This kind of major physical change didn't occur for him. The comic writers chose to keep his physical condition consistent without introducing such a significant alteration.
No, Echo doesn't have just 1 leg in the comics. She's typically depicted with two fully functioning legs.
No, Echo is not an amputated leg character in comics.
I don't think so. In the comics I know, Echo doesn't have one leg.