It means that there's a unique style suitable for each individual story. Different stories have their own distinct characteristics, and a corresponding style is needed to bring out their best.
Basically, 'a style for every story' suggests that no single style can fit all stories. Each story has its own requirements in terms of tone, language, and structure, and a matching style helps make it more engaging and effective.
It implies that there are always two different perspectives or viewpoints in any situation. Just like in a dispute, one person may see it as right while the other may think it's wrong.
It implies that each tale, whether it's a short fable or a long epic, has a story within it. Tales are vessels for stories, and this statement emphasizes the fundamental nature of tales as carriers of narrative.
It implies that each animal has its own unique experiences. For example, a stray dog might have a story of survival on the streets, facing hunger and danger. It could also mean that animals have emotional and behavioral stories. A cat that was once abused may have a story of learning to trust humans again.
It implies that leaders use stories as a tool. Stories can be used to inspire their followers, convey their vision, and make their ideas more relatable.
It implies that the story is made up of small, incremental parts. Each 'little step' is an important building block of the overall story.
It implies that each Christmas is unique and has a tale of its own. Maybe it's about the family traditions, the special gifts given or received, or the events that happen during that time.
It implies that each picture has the potential to convey a narrative. Just like a short story, a picture can capture a moment, an emotion, or a sequence of events within its frame.
It means there are always two viewpoints. The plaintiff might claim damages and present facts to support it. But the defendant will have their own narrative. They may argue that the plaintiff was also at fault or that there was a misunderstanding. Just like in a contract dispute, one side could say the terms were breached, while the other says they were following the contract as they understood it.
It could imply that until the powerful or the silenced (represented by the lion) gain the ability to tell their own stories, the true version of events may not be fully known. Just like in many situations, the dominant voices often shape the stories, but when the less - heard (the lion) can write every story, things will be different.
In art, 'every original has a story' implies that there's a narrative related to its creation. An artist might pour their emotions, memories, or ideas into their work. Take Van Gogh's 'Starry Night'. His troubled mental state and his love for the view from his asylum window are all part of the story behind that iconic painting.