It depends. Historical fiction can be mainstream when it gains significant popularity and wide readership. But sometimes it might be more niche depending on the specific story and its marketing.
Yes, 1970 can be considered part of historical fiction depending on the context and the story being told.
It depends on the specific work related to 1776. Some depictions might be considered historical fiction if they blend real events with fictional elements to create a narrative.
Definitely. 1984 is considered historical fiction because it comments on historical social and political conditions through a fictional narrative. It offers a fictionalized perspective on real-world issues and trends of its time.
Yes, historical fiction can often be considered commercial fiction. It usually attracts a wide readership and has the potential to sell well in the market.
Yes, historical fiction can be part of literary fiction. It often combines fictional characters and plots with a historically accurate setting and events.
Sure, historical fiction is fiction. It blends real history with imaginative creations. Authors use their creativity to fill in gaps or tell stories that might have happened within a historical context.
Not usually. Ghost fiction often involves supernatural elements and isn't typically set in a historical context.
No. Submissive erotic fiction is not a mainstream genre. Mainstream literature usually focuses on a wide range of themes that are more accessible and acceptable to the general public. This type of erotic fiction is more niche and caters to a specific audience with particular interests.
No. Adult BDSM fiction is a niche genre that is not considered mainstream. Mainstream literature typically focuses on a broader range of themes and is more accessible to a general audience.
Sometimes it can be. If the refugee story is set in the past and explores historical events or periods, it might fall under historical fiction.