Sure you can. It depends on the style and effect you want to create. Sometimes, it can add variety and emphasis.
You can mix them. However, it's important to have a clear reason for doing so. It could be to show a contrast or to draw attention to a specific moment. Just make sure the transitions are smooth and the reader can follow along easily.
Yes, you can. For example, 'I walk to the old house where I grew up. The walls are still the same as they were years ago, but now there are new curtains in the windows.' This mixing can add depth and a sense of time continuity to the story.
No, in a formal report, it's best to maintain a consistent tense. Usually, the past tense is used for reporting past events or research findings, and the present tense for general statements or facts that are still true. Mixing tenses can make the report seem unprofessional and confusing.
Yes. It could be used to create a sense of timelessness or to draw attention to specific moments. However, it needs to be used sparingly and with a clear purpose to avoid disrupting the overall past tense narrative.
The marker of the present perfect tense is already or has already passed, indicating that the action has continued from a certain time in the past until now. For example: - She had already walked for an hour. - He had learned a foreign language before. The marker of the past perfect tense is used to indicate that the action has been completed before a certain time in the past. For example: He had been learning a foreign language for a year. - She had been walking for an hour and five minutes. It should be noted that the past perfect tense is usually used to indicate actions that have been completed before a certain time in the past, while the present perfect tense is used to indicate actions that are currently being done.
The present perfect tense is marked with have/has, and the past tense is marked with had. For example: - I have finished my homework - She had gone to the store before she came back home Note that the present perfect tense and the simple past tense are different in grammar. The present perfect tense focuses on actions that have been completed before a certain point in the past while the simple past tense focuses on actions that have taken place before a certain point in the past.
Marks are words used to express the relationship between time, such as past, present, future, etc. The present perfect tense means that the action started at a certain point in the past and continues until now. The emphasis is on the duration of the action. The simple past tense meant that the action was completed before a certain point in the past, emphasizing the start time of the action. In novels, it was often necessary to use the present perfect tense and the simple past tense to describe the actions and states of the characters. For example, if a character started doing something at a certain point in time and continued until now, it could be expressed in the present perfect tense, while if a character completed something before a certain point in time in the past, it could be expressed in the simple past tense. For example: - He had been busy the whole day until ten o'clock in the evening. - He had once learned a new skill but had never had the time to practice it. - Last night, she dreamed that she had gone back in time and changed everything. In these examples, the markers "always","until","once","but", etc. are used to emphasize the duration and sequence of actions.
Present tense can come into play in past tense fiction when it's essential to give a sense of timelessness or universality to a particular experience. Sometimes, authors use it to break the traditional narrative flow and add a unique flavor to the story.
Yes, you have the flexibility to do that. The key is to use the tenses appropriately and consistently within a specific context to make the narrative coherent and engaging for the readers.
It depends. Both present and past tenses can be used in fiction. Some genres or styles might favor one over the other.
Symbol words: am is is was has been have been will be will have had was had been are were had been are Simple present tense: - The Present Continuous Tense:am/is/are doing - Present Perfect Tense:has/has been doing Future tense: - Future Continuous Tense:will/will have been doing - Future Perfect Tense:will have/had been done Simple Past Tense: - Past Continuous Tense:was/was doing - Past Perfect Tense:has/has been doing The difference between the simple present tense and the simple future tense: - The simple present tense is used to describe actions or states that are currently happening. The simple future tense is used to describe actions or states that may happen in the future. - The simple past tense is used to describe an action or state that has happened in the past. The difference between the simple present tense and the simple future tense is similar to the past tense. - The present continuous tense and the present perfect tense are both used to describe an ongoing action or state, but the former is usually used for an action that has not happened in the past while the latter is used for an action that has been completed before a certain point in the past. Simple Future Perfect Tense: will have been done - It means that actions that have been completed before a certain point in time in the future will continue to happen but have nothing to do with the present.