Sure, it can be okay. As long as it's done in a way that's legal and doesn't violate any copyrights.
Yes, it is. But you need to make sure it fits well and doesn't feel forced. Also, be careful about copyright issues if you're using specific elements from the movie.
In most cases, it is okay to reference Poirot in novels. It can bring a familiar element to the story and attract readers who are fans of Poirot. Just be careful to use the reference appropriately and not rely on it too heavily to carry the plot.
Sure, it can be fine. As long as it fits the context and adds something to the comic's story or atmosphere.
Sure, it can be okay. It depends on how it fits into the story and the context. If it adds to the authenticity or plot, go for it.
It depends on how you interpret the comic. Sometimes not being okay can lead to character growth and a deeper story.
It's kind of a broad question. The quality and appeal of comics with straights can vary a lot. It might depend on the plot, the characters' development, and the style of the comic.
Well, it's not a straightforward answer. The perception of whether the straights are okay in the comic depends on various factors like the story's context, the characters' actions and interactions, and the overall messaging of the comic.
I don't think so. 'Pulp Fiction' is famous for things like the Royale with Cheese dialogue, the briefcase, and Vincent Vega's adventures. 'It's your birth rite pulp fiction' doesn't seem to point to any of those specific elements. It could be someone trying to make a grand statement about the movie's importance but failing to use the correct words.
It depends. In some informal or creative settings, it might be fine. But for more professional or serious projects, it's usually not the best choice.
I'm okay as long as the comic adaptation respects the characters and plot of the original. Changes can be okay if they enhance the story, but not if they ruin it.