Yes," Celebrating Years 2 " was broadcasted exclusively on iQiyi. The iQiyi platform provided a limited viewing service for the TV series "Celebrating Years". The audience could watch all the episodes of the show for free on iQiyi. Therefore," Celebrating Years 2 " should also be broadcasted on iQiyi.
Yes," Celebrating Years 2 " was broadcasted exclusively on iQiyi. The iQiyi platform provided a limited viewing service for the TV series "Celebrating Years". The audience could watch all the episodes of the show for free on iQiyi. Therefore," Celebrating Years 2 " should also be broadcasted on iQiyi.
Yes," Celebrating Years " was broadcasted exclusively on iQiyi. The audience could watch all episodes of the show for free on the iQiyi platform. Celebrating Years 2 should also be broadcasted on iQiyi.
Yes," Celebrating Years " was broadcasted exclusively on iQiyi. The audience could watch all episodes of the show for free on the iQiyi platform. Celebrating Years 2 should also be broadcasted on iQiyi.
iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service for "Celebrating Years" on its iQiyi platform. VIP members could watch more episodes of the show in advance by paying. However, this service caused controversy, and some consumers felt that this model violated their legal rights. As a Gold VIP member, Mr. Wu sued iQiyi in court. In the first trial, the Beijing Internet Court found that iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" had damaged the existing rights and interests of its members, and some of the format clauses were also deemed invalid. The court ordered iQiyi to continue to provide the original membership rights to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff 1500 yuan. This ruling meant that iQiyi needed to change its advanced on-demand service model to protect the rights and interests of consumers.
iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service during the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years." This service meant that VIP members could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this was a violation of his rights and took iQiyi to court. The Beijing Internet Court ruled that iQiyi's actions had damaged the rights and interests of Gold VIP members and violated the terms of the contract. The court ordered iQiyi to provide the original membership rights to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff. The ruling attracted widespread attention, but it was unclear whether Chu iQiyi would appeal.
iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service for "Celebrating Years" on its iQiyi platform, which meant that VIP members had to pay an additional fee to watch the series in advance. However, the Beijing Internet Court held that this behavior violated the rights of the Golden VIP members and damaged their viewing experience and satisfaction. The court ruled that iQiyi had breached the contract and demanded compensation of 1500 yuan. The case sparked widespread discussion, and many people expressed dissatisfaction with this "advanced on-demand" model. In general, iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" approach was deemed illegal and harmed the rights and interests of users.
On the iQiyi platform operated by iQiyi, the company implemented an "advanced on-demand" method for dramas such as "Celebrating Years". This mode meant that users had to pay an additional fee to watch the follow-up content of the series in advance. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this was a violation of his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. The Beijing Internet Court found in the first-instance judgment that iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" had damaged the existing rights and interests of its members. The court pointed out that the development of the business model should follow the commercial terms, respect the user's feelings, and not violate the relevant laws and regulations. The court also found that some of iQiyi's standard terms were invalid. According to the judgment, iQiyi Company needed to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee.
On the iQiyi platform that it operated, iQiyi implemented a "pay-to-view" approach for dramas such as "Celebrating Years". However, a Gold VIP member felt that this model violated his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. In the first trial, the Beijing Internet Court determined that "advanced on-demand" should not harm the existing rights and interests of members. The court also pointed out that some of the format clauses in iQiyi's VIP membership agreement were invalid. According to the judgment, iQiyi Company needed to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This ruling was considered a ruling on the breach of contract of iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" model.
iQiyi launched an "advanced on-demand" service for "Celebrating Years" on its iQiyi platform, which meant that users could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, the Beijing Internet Court ruled that this "advanced on-demand" mode violated the rights and interests of Golden VIP members and damaged their viewing experience and satisfaction. The court held that the healthy development of the business model should be based on compliance with business terms, respect for the user's feelings, and not violate the relevant laws and regulations. Therefore, the court ruled that iQiyi Company had to provide the original VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This ruling was aimed at protecting the rights and interests of consumers while balancing the healthy development of Internet companies.
iQiyi launched an advanced on-demand service for "Celebrating Years" on its iQiyi platform, which meant that users could watch the series in advance, but they had to pay an additional fee. However, a Gold VIP member felt that this method violated his legal rights and took iQiyi to court. In the first instance, the Beijing Internet Court found that iQiyi's advanced on-demand service constituted a breach of contract, and ruled that iQiyi provided the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff and compensated the loss of 1500 yuan for the notary fee. The court held that the healthy development of the business model should follow the commercial terms and respect the user's feelings, and did not violate the relevant laws and regulations. The case has sparked widespread controversy, but it's not clear whether iQiyi will appeal.