The difference between the movie To Youth and the original novel was huge! She felt that the movie was so disgusting. What did everyone think?
The difference between the movie 'To Youth' and the original novel was probably because the film adaptation was not faithful enough to the original novel. The plot and character settings of the original novel were more in-depth and detailed than the movie, so the movie might not have perfectly presented the plot and characters in the novel. Some people might feel that the movie was not good enough or even disgusted. However, this did not mean that all the plots and performances of the movie were bad. Everyone's taste and perception are different. Some people may like movies very much, while others may think it's not good enough. The most important thing is that we should respect the original novel because it is the creation of the copyright owner, and we should also respect their decisions and rights. If the original novel is not adapted well enough, we can appeal to the film production company to improve or choose not to watch the film.
What did everyone think of the movie 'Youth?'
" Youth " was a Chinese war film released in 2017. It was adapted from Yan Geling's novel of the same name and narrated the living conditions and experiences of the Chinese army and people during the Youth Period of the last century. The film was a huge success in both China and overseas markets, winning many awards and nomination. The success of Youth lies in its successful combination of the plot of the novel and real history to portray a group of real and credible characters. At the same time, the film also portrayed the profound impact of war and the changes of the times through exquisite shots and sound effects, allowing the audience to deeply feel the cruelty and warmth of that era. Although 'Youth' was not a perfect film, it had an important position in the history of Chinese film. It presented a real, touching and deep film to the audience.
What was the difference between the movie 'Youth' and the original novel?
There were some differences between the movie and the original novel in terms of storyline, character setting, and character. In terms of storyline, the movie "Youth" was adapted from the original novel, which told the story of a group of young people in a small town in southern China in the 1960s, including their marriage, love, friendship, work, and life values. Compared to the movie, the story of the original novel was more detailed and in-depth. It explored the political environment and cultural background of the society at that time, as well as the emotional entanglements and interpersonal relationships between different characters. In terms of character setting, the movie "Youth" had deleted or adapted some of the characters in the original novel, such as the character and fate of the heroine, He Xiaoping. The movie focused more on shaping the young people of the new era, such as the female protagonist Liu Feng and the male protagonist Chen Can. They were more representative and had a sense of the times, while some characters in the original novel were simplified or omitted. In terms of character, the characters in the original novel were more vivid, and some of them had more dramatic and complicated personalities and fates. For example, the heroine He Xiao Ping was a character with a complicated family background and growth experience. Her fate was affected by many factors such as family, society and herself. The movie "Youth" paid more attention to the simplicity and kindness of the characters, as well as their living conditions and values in a specific era. In summary, there are some differences between the movie "Youth" and the original novel in terms of storyline, character setting, and character. This is one of the differences between the two.
Why was there such a huge difference between the movie and the book?
This question involves two different story sources and creative processes, so the answer will vary according to the specific situation. The movie " To Live " was adapted from Yu Hua's novel of the same name. There were some differences between the two, which was one of the reasons for the large gap between the movie and the novel. The novel Alive is one of Yu Hua's masterpieces. It reflects the historical changes of China's rural areas in the 20th century by telling the fate of the protagonist Fugui. The novel was set in China in the 1940s, and it told the story of Fu Gui's tragic fate of being exploited, deprived, exiled, and imprisoned from a wealthy landlord. The movie, Alive, was based on the novel of the same name, but it made some adjustments and cuts in the storyline and character creation to meet the requirements of the movie. The movie Alive and the novel Alive had different plots and character settings, which was one of the reasons for the big difference between the movie and the novel. The creative process of a movie and a novel is different, and their understanding and presentation of the story are also different, which may lead to differences between them.
Did everyone think that 'To Youth: So You're Still Here' was a good movie?
To Youth: So You're Still Here was a movie directed by Chen Kaige and starred by Kris Wu and Liu Yifei. The film was adapted from the story of two young people in their youth. After the movie was released, it received a lot of attention and praise from the audience. Some people thought that this movie was an excellent youth movie. It told the story of two people in their youth and showed the beauty and preciousness of youth. There were also people who felt that the plot of the movie was a little cliché and that the actors 'performances were not good enough. " To Youth: So You're Still Here " was a controversial movie. Whether it was good or not depended on the audience's understanding and preference for youth movies.
The difference between the movie and the original novel?
" Camel Xiangzi " was a classic Chinese novel about a young man, Camel Xiangzi, who pursued freedom and dreams during the Republic of China. There were some differences between the movie and the original in terms of plot, character creation, and visual effects. The movie " Camel Xiangzi " was adapted from the novel. It mainly retained the core plot and character relationships in the novel, but simplified and summarized the characters 'images and personalities. At the same time, some details in the novel might be deleted. The plot in the movie was more compact, and the scenes and special effects were more modern. Different from the novel, the movie portrayed Camel Xiangzi as a man who pursued success and wealth. He kept trying to change his fate, but under the pressure of society and morality, he finally chose to compromise and give up. The presentation of such characters might be more in line with the values of modern society. In addition, some entertainment elements such as dance and music were added to the movie to make it more relaxing and enjoyable. Compared to the heaviness and depression in the novel, the movie might be more relaxed and lively. Although there are differences between the movie and the original work, Camel Xiangzi, as a classic of Chinese novels, still has a high artistic value and cultural content, worthy of the audience and art lovers to watch and appreciate.
What was the difference between the original novel and the movie?
There were many differences between Journey to the West and the original. Here are some of the main differences: 1. Plot: The original novel Journey to the West tells the story of the adventures of Sun Wukong, Zhu Bajie and Monk Sand who protect the Tang Monk in the West. As for the film and television works, they had adapted the storyline and added some comedy elements and special effects, such as adding the characters of monsters and immortals and adding some action scenes. 2. Character Creation: The main characters in the original Journey to the West, Sun Wukong, Zhu Bajie, and Monk Sand, are depicted in a very three-dimensional and rich manner. Their personalities, behaviors, and growth experiences are all portrayed in great detail. In movies and television works, the images of these characters might be more simplified and exaggerated, and they might pay more attention to special effects and action scenes. 3. Character relationship: The relationship between the main characters in the original Journey to the West is very complicated. The love and hate between them, as well as the mutual support and confrontation between them are very rich. Film and television works might simplify and summarize these relationships, paying more attention to the actions and special effects of the characters. 4. The main theme of the original Journey to the West was about humanity, morality, faith, and freedom. Film and television works might adapt and adjust these topics to pay more attention to entertainment and viewing. The film and television works of Journey to the West were very different from the original in terms of plot, character creation, character relationships, and theme. Although the film and television works would be adapted and added with some content, their purpose was to pursue better entertainment effects.
What was the difference between the movie and the original novel?
The difference between the movie and the original novel was usually in the following aspects: 1 Storyline: There may be some differences between the movie and the original story. For example, the theme in the original novel might be more profound or the plot might be more compact, while the movie might be relatively relaxed and humorous. 2. Character image: There may be some changes in the character image between the movie and the original work. For example, the main characters in the original novel might be more vivid and three-dimensional, while the movie might pay more attention to the relationship and interaction between the characters. 3. Language expression: The original works usually use more straightforward and simple language, while the movies may use more tactful and delicate ways to express emotions. 4. Movie adaptation: Movies usually adapt the original work to meet commercial and market needs. The methods of adaptation might include deleting, adding, or modifying the plot. In short, the difference between the movie and the original was usually in terms of storyline, character image, language expression, and film adaptation. No matter which version it was, one could get a beautiful emotional experience from it.
What was the difference between the movie and the original novel?
There were many differences between the movie and the original novel. The following are some of the main differences: 1. Character Creation: The original work of " White Deer Plain " was a huge historical novel that described the characters and events in different historical periods from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the 1970s. The movie paid more attention to the image of the main characters, such as Bai Ling, Lu Zilin, and so on. Their images and stories were more vividly presented in the movie. 2. Plot setting: The original plot of " White Deer Plain " was complicated and involved many historical periods and characters. The movie was relatively simple and paid more attention to the relationship between the main characters, such as the resentment between Lu Zilin and Bai Ling, as well as the dispute between the White Deer family. 3. Scene restoration: There are many historical scenes and characters in the original work. The movie has made some adjustments in restoring these scenes and characters. For example, the description of Bai Xiaowen and Lu Zilin in the movie was different from the original. At the same time, there were some cuts and adjustments in the restoration of the scenes. 4. Visual effects: There were many descriptions and expressions of characters in the original work of White Deer Plain, which were presented more delicately in the movie. At the same time, some adjustments were made to the visual effects of the movie, such as changing the shooting angle and the composition of the picture. The movie " White Deer Plain " was different from the original in terms of character creation, plot setting, scene restoration, and visual effects. However, they were all based on the original to present a more vivid and real historical story.
The difference between the original work and the movie
The difference between the original work and the movie could be described in the following aspects: 1. Plot: Painted Skin is a horror novel that tells a mysterious story. The movie " The Painted Skin " was a horror film. The plot revolved around a mysterious painted skin and told the story of the grudges between a man and a woman. 2. Character image: The characters in the original work of Painted Skin are more voluptuous and have a lot of detailed descriptions. The main characters in the movie are relatively simple and have a large change in image. 3. Setting up: The setting in the original painting was rich, including mysterious caves, ancient temples, etc. The setting in the movie was relatively simple, mainly caves and temples. 4. Music and special effects: Painted Skin's original music and special effects are more outstanding and can enhance the horror atmosphere. The soundtracks and special effects in the movie were relatively simple. The original work of Painted Skin was very different from the movie in terms of storyline, character image, setting, music, and special effects.
What's the difference between the movie and the original?
There were many differences between the movie and the original novel. The following are some of the main points: 1 Storyline: The plot of the movie is very different from that of the original. In the original novel, Claude, the vice-bishop of Notre-Dame de Paris, was a hypocrite and vicious person. He described the two protagonists in Victor Hugo's novel, Esmeralda and Quasimodo, as heartless, unjust and cold liars. The movie focused on the relationship between Esmeralda and Victor Hugo, emphasizing their friendship and love. 2. Character Creation: The characters in the original work are relatively flat and lack depth and three-dimensional sense. The movie made each character have their own unique personality and experience more vivid through different characters. For example, Quasimodo, the clock tower freak in the movie, made his image richer and deeper through his unique appearance and personality, as well as his emotional entanglement with Esmeralda. 3. Picture presentation: The original work is mainly presented in the form of a novel, using narrative language, while the film uses a more visual form of expression. The movie made it easier for the audience to be attracted by the plot through beautiful pictures and music. For example, the clock tower and church buildings in the movie made it easier for the audience to feel their beauty and magnificence through the beautiful images. 4. Cultural background: The original novel mainly tells a European story that took place in the 15th century, while the film pays more attention to the problems faced by Notre-Dame de Paris in modern society. The film presented the historical, cultural, and religious significance of the cathedral, as well as the problems it faced, so that the audience could have a deeper understanding of the background and significance of the story. The movie "Notre-Dame de Paris" was very different from the original novel in terms of storyline, character creation, picture presentation and cultural background, which made them have their own unique charm and value.