The copyright was also called copyright. The following understanding of copyright is correct:

2024-09-20 05:02

The copyright was also called copyright. The following understanding of copyright is correct: 1. Citizens enjoy copyright, enjoy the right to sign, publish, publish, and receive remuneration according to law. 2. Citizens 'civil rights are citizens' copyrights. 3. Citizens enjoy copyrights from birth. 4. When A citizen's copyright is violated, the copyright owner has the right to demand that the violation be stopped, the impact be eliminated, and the loss be compensated.

1 answer

2024-09-20 10:04

The copyright referred to the rights that the author enjoyed for his work, including the right of signature, the right to modify, the right to protect the integrity of the work, the right to publish, the right to distribute, the right to exhibit, the right to perform, the right to show, the right to broadcast, the right to transmit information online, the right to translate, the right to compile, and so on. The term of copyright was the author's lifetime and fifty years after his death, or a reasonable period of use.

What was the difference between copyright and copyright? Was there a difference between copyright and copyright?

1 answer

2024-09-13 13:54

Both copyrights and copyrights were related to the copyright of a work. However, their specific meaning was slightly different from the legal provisions. The copyright referred to the rights enjoyed by the copyright owner of the work, including the right to create, adapt, translate, compile, display, and transmit. In law, copyright is a kind of property right. The copyright owner can obtain economic benefits by selling, renting, sharing, or authorization of others to use his work. On the other hand, copyright referred to the author's rights to his original literary works, including personal rights and property rights. Personal rights included the right to publish, the right to sign, and the right to protect the integrity of the work. Property rights included the right to adapt, translate, compile, and sell. Therefore, the main difference between copyright and copyright was the scope of rights and legal status. The copyright was a kind of property right and the copyright was a kind of personal right. On the legal level, copyright was more extensive and important than copyright.

1 answer

2024-09-20 05:35

According to the provisions of the third paragraph of article 1 of the "copyright law", the following works are within the scope of protection of the copyright law: (3)The original ideas, works, concepts, principles, and methods in the fields of literature, art, and science included engineering designs, product designs, maps, schematics, models, structures, machines, equipment, product samples, sample designs, computer programs, algorithms, mathematical models, scientific discoveries, research results, academic articles, theses, books, journals, newspapers, magazines, music, audio and video signals, electronic data packages, and so on. Therefore, whether it was online novels or other literary works, as long as they belonged to the original ideas, works, concepts, principles, methods, etc. in the fields of literature, art, and science as stipulated in paragraph 3 of article 1 of the copyright law, they could be protected by the copyright law.

What was the difference between copyright and copyright?

1 answer

2024-09-20 20:49

Both copyright and copyright are legal concepts that protect the creative rights of literary, artistic, and scientific works, but the scope of protection and the way of protection are different. The copyright referred to the personal and property rights that the author enjoyed in literary, artistic, and scientific works, including the right to create, adapt, translate, compile, perform, show, broadcast, and transmit information online. What copyright protected was the author's creative rights, including ideas, creativity, and forms of expression. It did not protect the actual value and commercial interests of the work. The copyright referred to the author's rights to adapt, translate, compile, perform, show, broadcast, and spread information on the Internet for literary, artistic, and scientific works. What copyright protected was the material form of the work, that is, the creative results of the work, including text, pictures, music, videos, etc. It did not protect the ideas, creativity, and forms of expression of the work. Therefore, the main difference between copyrights and copyrights was the scope of protection and the method of protection. The main purpose of copyright was to protect the author's creative rights, while copyright was to protect the material rights of the work more extensively. In practice, copyright and copyright were often used together. The copyright mainly protected the creative rights of literary works, while the copyright protected the rights of works such as movies, music, and photography.

Was the copyright of a movie the same as the copyright of a book?

1 answer

2024-09-19 08:39

The copyright of a movie was different from the copyright of a book. The copyright of a film or television series was usually purchased by the producer, director, screenwriter, actor, and other individuals or teams. The copyright of the work belonged to the author. This was because movies and TV series had different ways of creation and content, so the ownership of copyright was different. The creation of a film or television drama usually involved multiple participants who needed to adapt and create the script, picture, sound effects, etc. Therefore, the copyright was usually purchased by multiple individuals or teams. The creation of a book was relatively simple. The author only needed to retain the copyright of his literary work and authorized it to be printed, distributed, and sold by a publishing house or a publishing company. In addition, the copyright of movies and television dramas may have different legal provisions and treatment methods in different countries and regions. Therefore, the specific situation needs to be determined according to local laws and regulations.

What was the use of copyright filing in copyright cases?

1 answer

2024-09-21 02:48

The filing of works could have a certain legal effect on copyright cases and copyright disputes. The filing of a work meant that the author had to submit his work to the relevant department for filing when he created the work. This process was usually carried out by the copyright department or the copyright management department. They would review the work and confirm whether it belonged to the copyright category. If the work belonged to the copyright category after being filed, the creator would have a higher chance of winning in subsequent copyright cases. The filing of a work could also prevent the occurrence of copyright infringement cases.

On the Internet's copyright law and copyright law

1 answer

2024-09-13 13:40

The copyright law refers to the law that grants copyright to literary, artistic, and scientific works. The copyright law was a law that protected the rights of the creator of a work to the intellectual results of his creation. On the computer network, copyright law and copyright law both play a vital role. The copyright law protects literary, artistic, and scientific works on the Internet. The copyright law protects the right to distribute these works on the Internet. For example, publishing novels, poems, essays, and other literary works on the Internet required compliance with copyright law. If these works were protected by copyright law, the author would have the right to modify the work, to grant others the right to use it, to receive remuneration, and so on. At the same time, the spread of literary works on the Internet also needed to abide by copyright laws. If the work is not protected by copyright law, there is no need to bear any legal responsibility. However, if the works were protected by the copyright law, the communicator had to abide by the relevant provisions of the copyright law and bear the corresponding legal responsibility for the violation. Therefore, protecting the rights of literary, artistic, and scientific works on the Internet required compliance with both copyright laws.

How is online copyright defined in the copyright law?

1 answer

2024-09-13 13:26

The definition of online copyright in the copyright law mainly includes the following aspects: 1. The definition of works: works in the copyright law refer to literary, artistic, and scientific works that are original and can exist independently in some form and be appreciated and understood by others, including novels, poems, essays, plays, movies, music, dances, fine arts, photography, architectural designs, etc. 2. The definition of online works: online works refer to works created, disseminated, and shared through the Internet, including novels, poems, essays, plays, movies, music, dances, fine arts, photography, architectural designs, and other works created on the Internet. 3. The definition of online copyright: online copyright refers to the copyright rights generated by works created, disseminated and shared through the Internet. Including the following rights: (1)The right to publish: The right for online authors to publish their works through the Internet. (2)Transmission Right: The right of an online author to transmit his work through the Internet. (3)" Right of adaptation: The right of an online author to adapt, translate, edit, and synthesize online works. (4)[Derivation right: The right for web authors to derive other works through web works.] (5)The right to protect the integrity of the work: The online author has the right to repair, modify, and supplement the work. (6)Protection of the right to copy works: the right of online authors to copy, distribute, display, perform, and broadcast their works. (7)Protection of the right of online communication of work information: The right of online authors to spread their works through the Internet. The definition of online copyright in the copyright law was aimed at protecting the legitimate rights and interests of people who created and shared works through the Internet and promoting the development of online culture.

What did digital copyright, electronic copyright, and wireless copyright mean? What was the difference?

1 answer

2024-09-09 00:27

Digital copyright, electronic copyright, and wireless copyright were all technical measures for copyright protection. The main difference lay in the scope and method of protection. Digital copyright refers to the digitizing of copyrited content, using computer software, network technology, and other methods to store, transmit, and process it so that it can be disseminated and sold on the Internet. The scope of protection of digital copyright was wider than traditional copyright because the digital way allowed copyrights to be more flexibly distributed and transferred. Digital copyright usually included the copyright, adaptation, translation, continuation, adaptation, and other rights of digital works. Electronic copyright refers to the storage, transmission, and processing of copyright content in electronic form for the purpose of spreading and selling on the Internet. The scope of electronic copyright protection was more limited than traditional copyright because it usually only included the format, code, data, and other information of the work, not the content of the work itself. The wireless copyright referred to the right to distribute and sell works through wireless media such as the Internet, mobile networks, and wireless networks. The wireless copyright usually included the sound, image, video, and other forms of the work, not just the text content. Digital copyright, electronic copyright, and wireless copyright are all technical measures for copyright protection. The main difference lies in the scope and method of protection. The scope of digital copyright protection is broader, while the scope of electronic copyright protection is more limited. However, wireless copyright only includes the form of the work and not the content.

What was the difference between the protection of copyright in the online environment and the protection of copyright on the internet? Was online copyright the same as copyright in the online environment?

1 answer

2024-09-13 13:34

There was a difference between the protection of copyright in the network environment and the protection of copyright on the Internet. Online copyright referred to the copyright enjoyed by literary works created on the Internet. In the traditional offline environment, once the copyright was published, it would automatically take effect. And in the network environment, they also enjoyed the copyright of the network. The scope of protection for online copyrights was similar to the offline environment. It also included the creative expression of literature, art, science, and other aspects of the work, as well as the rights to adapt, translate, perform, and display the work. However, there are also some unique protection mechanisms for online copyrights, such as the Internet copyright protection law, online copyright registration, etc. These mechanisms help to protect the legitimate rights and interests of online copyright owners. Online copyrights were not copyrights in the online environment. Online copyright is a type of copyright that is protected under the network environment. Online copyright had nothing to do with the internet environment, but with the copyright itself.

On the issue of copyright

1 answer

2024-09-23 14:02

The term "copyright" refers to the personal and property rights enjoyed by the author of his literary works, music, movies, television dramas, photography, sculptures, paintings, and other works. The author's copyright protection period is divided into: 1. Original works: 50 years from the date of creation; (2) adaptation, translation, annotation, and arrangement of works: 20 years from the date of creation; (3) Film-related works and musical works produced in a similar manner: 20 years from the date of production. During the term of copyright protection, the author has the right to prohibit others from using his work without his authorization and has the right to take legal action against other people's acts of infringement. After the copyright protection period ends, the copyright of the work will be converted into public property. The author will lose all rights to the copyright of the work but can share the profits of its creation. During the copyright protection period, the author could also defend his rights by filing a lawsuit in court. The protection of copyright plays an important role in protecting creation and innovation, encouraging people to actively create and promote the development of the cultural industry. At the same time, the protection of copyright also helped to protect the legal rights and interests of the author and protect the freedom and dignity of his creation.