There was no legal basis for using the fruit image in One Piece as a fictional element in the novel to violate One Piece's copyright. Although One Piece was a popular manga and animation, the image of the fruit had become a cultural symbol. However, when writing a novel, you can freely use this symbol to create your own storyline without any copyright restrictions. Of course, if you were to use the image of One Piece's fruit in the novel, you would need to ensure that the use would not violate One Piece's copyright. You can take some appropriate measures such as giving the fruit a unique name or description in the novel or using it as a unique character element. In short, although it was legal to use the image of the fruit as a fictional element in the novel, it was necessary to ensure that it did not violate copyright.
Is it a violation of copyright to write mystery novels in the same way? If the storyline, character setting, reasoning process, and other basic elements of the two mystery novels were the same or similar, and they were not authorized by the author, then it might be considered an copyright violation. According to the copyright law, the author has the right to protect his own creation and prohibit others from copying, distributing, and spreading it without his authorization. If the basic elements of two mystery novels were the same or similar and they were not authorized by the author, it might be regarded as copyright violation. Of course, copyright law is not omnipotent. If there are some subtle differences between two mystery novels in terms of storyline, character setting, reasoning process, etc., and these differences are enough for readers to distinguish which is an original work, then it may not be considered as an copyright violation. If you plan to write a mystery novel, you should first understand the relevant laws and regulations to ensure that your work meets the requirements of the copyright law to avoid possible legal risks.
If the general content of a novel is the same and the elements or structure of another person's work are used without authorization, it may constitute copyright violation. In many countries, copyright laws prohibit the copying, distribution, performance, display, adaptation, translation, or distribution of another person's work without the permission of the copyright owner. If the content of the novel is similar and the elements or structure of another person's work are used without authorization, it may constitute copyright. For example, if a novel uses someone else's storyline, characters, scenes, or costume designs without the permission of the copyright owner, it may be an copyright violation. Therefore, when writing a novel, you should carefully consider whether you have violated the copyright of others and try to obtain the permission of the copyright owner or avoid the act of copyright violation.
It wasn't that the authors of One Piece: Amaterasu Fruit and One Piece: Mirror Image Fruit were different people.
If the name of the novel was similar to the name of the movie, and the author did not have the authorization to use the name directly, it might be considered an copyright violation. This is because in many countries, the names of novels and movies are regarded as intellectual property. Unauthorized use may violate the author's copyright. For example, if a similar name appeared between the novel Harry Potter and the movie Harry Potter, and the film company used the name without the author's authorization, it might be considered an copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, authors usually avoided using the name of their work directly by using similar names, adapting, and re-writing. In addition, if the novel and the movie have the same name but there are other differences between them, such as the storyline or characters of the movie, it may also be considered as copyright violation. Therefore, if the name of the novel was similar to the name of the movie, and the author did not have the authorization to use the name, it might be considered an copyright violation.
If the name of the novel is the same as the published novel and only minor changes have been made in some aspects, it may not be an copyright violation. This is because the main principle of copyright protection in many countries is the "original sin principle". If the original idea or basic plot of a book comes from another person's work, even if the name is the same, it may not constitute copyright violation. However, if the name is the same and the original work has been significantly modified or completely rewritten, it may constitute copyright. In this case, the author needed to prove that his work was independent and that he did not directly quote or plagiarize the work of others. Whether or not it was an copyright violation depended on many factors, including the uniqueness of the work, the degree of modification, the reason for the same name, and so on. Therefore, the best advice is to understand the relevant laws and regulations before creating any work to ensure that your creation is in compliance with the law.
The same character setting in the novel may constitute copyright violation. This was because in the process of literary creation, the author could design the setting of characters according to his own preferences, imagination, or inspiration. If multiple authors created based on the same character setting and these works were publicly released or circulated, readers might think that there were certain similarities between these works. If the characters in these works are the same, the readers may misunderstand or confuse them and even think that these works are the works of the same author. In this case, if the author used the same or similar character settings in other works, it might be regarded as an act of copyright violation. Therefore, authors should be careful not to use the same character setting in multiple works to avoid the problem of copyright violation.
The title of a novel being the same as someone else's does not necessarily constitute copyright infringement. It depends on whether the title of the novel has obtained original authorization. Usually, the name of a novel is a representation of the content of the novel. If the name of the novel is the same as someone else's and it has not been authorized by the original author, it may constitute an copyright violation. In the case where the novel's name was authorized to be original, the similarity between the novel's name and other works would not cause copyright infringement. For example, if the name of the novel was "So-and-so" and other works were also named "So-and-so", then the similarity between them might not constitute an copyright violation. However, if the name of the novel was very similar to the name of other works or used the intellectual property rights of other works, such as the trademark, name, image, etc., it might constitute an copyright violation. In this case, it was necessary to confirm whether the title of the novel had been authorized by the relevant intellectual property rights or whether it had violated the intellectual property rights of other works. If there was any violation, the corresponding legal responsibility would be borne. Therefore, when writing novels, authors were advised to reflect their uniqueness in the name as much as possible and obtain original authorization to avoid possible legal risks.
If you write a novel with the same title as an existing novel, you may face copyright violation. This is because in many countries, copyright protection lasts for decades or even longer, so if the same author uses the same name in the same work, it may be regarded as an act of copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, you should avoid using the same or similar name as an existing work. You can use a different name or create a new name to avoid copyright. In addition, you can also create some unique elements or plots in your work to make your novel different from other works to avoid copyright violation. Of course, in some cases, you may be exempted from copyright violation. For example, if your work is an adaptation or translation and you have obtained permission from the original author, you may have the right to use the title and storyline of the work. However, this situation is not generally applicable, so it is recommended that you first understand the relevant laws and regulations before creating.
Whether a duplicate book would violate the copyright or not depended on the specific circumstances. Generally speaking, if the content of a book with the same name is the same or similar to the original work and the original author has not authorized it, then the use of a book with the same name may constitute copyright violation. In the creation and spread of literary works, copyright protection was very important. Without authorization, no one is allowed to copy, adapt, translate, or distribute the original work. If the content of a book with the same name is similar to the original work and is not authorized by the original author, then using the original work may be regarded as an act of copyright. However, many literary works could have multiple versions or translation after authorization, which did not constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the book with the same name was different from the original work and highlighted its own unique storyline or style, then it might not be an copyright violation. If you want to use the original work, it's best to get permission from the original author. If you're not sure if it's a violation, you can consult a professional.
Writing a game or novel with the same name as Perfect World without the authorization of Perfect World might violate its intellectual property rights. Therefore, it is recommended to contact Perfect World to understand its intellectual property policies and requirements and obtain its written permission or authorization. If you don't have authorization, you may need to consider using its name, character, storyline, and other elements to comply with relevant laws and regulations.