Douban ratings were not the only standard to measure the quality of a movie, nor could they completely represent the preferences and opinions of the audience. The relatively low Douban rating of Kung Fu might be related to the following factors: 1. The quality of the movie itself was not good. Although this movie was one of Stephen's masterpieces, its plot and performance were not outstanding, and it might not attract the attention and love of many viewers. 2. The market situation when the movie was released. The audience's preferences and emotions during the movie's release would also affect the movie's Douban rating. If the audience had high expectations for the film or the film was affected by some negative public opinion during the screening period, it might cause the rating to drop. 3. The influence of personal subjective evaluation. The audience's personal subjective evaluation would also affect the movie's Douban rating. Some viewers might comment on the movie for personal reasons or evaluate certain elements in the movie. These comments may affect the overall rating. Douban's rating was not the only standard to measure the quality of a movie. It was affected by many factors.
There were several reasons why Douban's movie ratings were low: The user composition of Douban Movies was more complicated. Many of them were artistic youths, movie lovers, professional film critics, etc. They had different evaluation standards for the quality, style, and genre of movies. Therefore, there might be some subjective bias in the grading. 2. Douban's movie rating system was rather cumbersome. It required users to upload a movie rating of 5 or above before they could submit their rating. This caused some users to lack real thought and evaluation for the sake of rating. 3. Douban's movie ratings were exaggerated. Some movies might be marked with low scores for various reasons, such as being maliciously rated or being spammed by fake reviewers. This would affect the fairness and accuracy of the grading. 4. There is a problem with the scoring mechanism of Douban movies. Douban's movie rating algorithm may have loopholes that caused some high-scoring movies to be misjudged as low-scoring movies or some low-scoring movies to be overestimated. Douban's movie rating system has flaws and problems. We need to further improve the fairness and accuracy of the rating system so that more users can objectively and accurately evaluate movies.
Douban's movie ratings are controversial, but generally speaking, Douban's movie ratings are more objective and have higher reference value. There could be many reasons for a low score, but some of them might include: There may be some problems with the Douban user rating system, such as the fairness and accuracy of the rating. Douban's movie ratings may be affected by some factors such as personal feelings, cultural background, regional differences, etc. 3. Movie ratings also depend on personal preferences. Some people may give higher ratings to certain movies and lower ratings to others. 4. There may also be situations where movie ratings are fake. Some people may give fake ratings in order to obtain high ratings. Although Douban's movie ratings were controversial, as an important film evaluation platform, their ratings still had a certain reference value.
Douban's rating system was influenced by many factors, including readers 'cultural background, reading experience, hobbies, and so on. Although Chinese literary works have a high evaluation on Douban, this does not mean that they are outstanding in all aspects. Some readers might think that Chinese literature was too dull and lacked depth and meaning. These works may lack unique perspectives and novel plots, or lack characters and plot developments that can attract readers. In addition, some readers might think that Chinese literature lacked an international perspective and could not compare with the literature of other countries in the world. Douban's evaluation system was also prejudiced and discriminated against by some readers. Some readers might discriminate against Chinese literature because of their personal preferences or cultural background, resulting in them receiving low or good marks. To sum up, although Chinese literature has a high evaluation on Douban, they may not be outstanding in all aspects. The readers 'opinions and preferences were also affected by many factors.
Some famous works have low ratings on Douban because people have different reading experiences and preferences. These famous works may not meet the expectations or tastes of readers in some aspects. There may be some flaws in the masterpiece itself, such as poor writing, unreasonable plot structure, improper character description, etc. These problems may cause readers to give the masterpiece a low rating. The time span of masterpieces is long. The readers may have changed over time, and their reading experience and preferences may have changed. Therefore, the ratings of famous works on Douban might also decline over time. Masterpieces may be understood and evaluated by different people in different regions or cultures. Therefore, the ratings of famous works on Douban might also vary due to regional and cultural differences. Douban had a large reader base, which might have different reading preferences and backgrounds. Therefore, the ratings of famous works on Douban could also be affected by different reader groups.
" 13 Minke Street " was a popular urban novel by a pure little dragon. The novel was published on Qidian Chinese website and was very popular among readers. The story tells the story of the protagonist, Cullen, who traveled to a strange world and gained the ability to wake the dead. The readers could read or listen to this book on the Qidian Reading App. The audio book recommended the host, Beiming Yousheng. They had carefully adapted the characters and had rich voices to allow the readers to better immerse themselves in the story. You can also get an experience member if you go to Qidian to listen to books now! On the Qidian Reading App, readers could read authentic books and listen to authentic audio. The male lead, Cullen Immoles, was a calm, rational, venomous, and black-bellied character who clearly distinguished between love and hate. The female lead, Eunice Allen, was intelligent, gentle, cute, and considerate.
13 Minke Street's score was not low. An article pointed out that the novel had a rating of 9.8. It was considered a successful commercial work, and the author had changed in his writing. In addition, there was also an article that claimed that the novel had been in the top ten of the monthly votes and best-selling list during the serial phase. Therefore, based on the information provided, 13 Mink Street's score was not low.
Kung Fu Football was a movie directed and starred by Stephen Chou, which was released in 1994. The movie was about a young man named A Xing. He lost his football skills due to an accident, but he didn't give up. Through self-study and consulting a coach, he eventually became an outstanding kung fu master. He participated in a football match but was ostracized and ridiculed by his opponents. However, he used his kung fu skills to win the match. A Xing's story reflected the current situation of Chinese football and people's attitude towards Chinese football. The movie used A Xing's story to appeal to people to pay attention to Chinese football and encourage people to become excellent football players through their own efforts and self-study. Kung Fu Football was a classic Chinese football movie that was very popular with the audience.
There were several possibilities for the low rating of the Douban Celebration of the Year. First of all, there were reports that the VVIP operation of Celebrating Years had offended many users, and there might be cases where users maliciously left negative reviews. Secondly, the audience's main target group for " Letter of Grievance " was the female audience. Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo were very popular among the female audience, so they were more willing to give " Letter of Grievance " high marks. In addition, some viewers said that the VOD platform for " Celebrating Years " was relatively expensive. The audience needed to spend 50 yuan to watch the plot of six episodes, and they needed to continue spending money to continue watching. This caused dissatisfaction among the audience, causing the ratings to gradually drop. In addition, there were also viewers who felt that the main actors of " Celebrating Years " did not have enough traffic, and there were not enough comments to control the likes. This might also affect the ratings. In general, the low rating of the Douban Celebration was probably due to the combined influence of VVIP operations, audience preferences, and the cost of broadcasting.
There were several possibilities for the low rating of the Douban Celebration of the Year. First of all, there were reports that the VVIP operation of Celebrating Years had offended many users, and there might be cases where users maliciously left negative reviews. Secondly, the audience's main target group for " Chen Qing Ling " was the female audience, and Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo were very popular among the female audience." Celebrating Years " was a male lead drama, and the female audience's enthusiasm for participation was low, which might lead to a lower rating. Other than that, it was also possible that other factors caused the audience to be dissatisfied with the plot, the actors 'performance, and so on, resulting in a low rating. In short, there might be many reasons for Qing Yunian's low Douban score.
There were several possibilities for the low rating of the Douban forum. First of all, there were reports that the VVIP operation of Celebrating Years had offended many users, and there might be cases where users maliciously left negative reviews. Secondly, the main audience for " Chen Qing Ling " was the female audience, and Xiao Zhan and Wang Yibo were very popular among the female audience. " Celebrating Years " was essentially a male lead drama. The female audience was less enthusiastic about participating. To put it in layman's terms, if it didn't have the feeling that they wanted, they naturally wouldn't give it high marks. In addition, there were also opinions that Douban ratings were not necessarily accurate and that there might be some non-objective ratings. In short, there might be many reasons for Qing Yunian's low Douban score.