Why are so many bad shows talking about actors, but no one says it's the scriptwriter's problem?
One of the main reasons why many bad dramas were widely criticized was that the scriptwriters were not good enough or there were plagiarism problems. Although the actors 'performance might be excellent, if the plot was unreasonable or there was fraud, the audience would find it difficult to tolerate. In contrast, the popularity and acting skills of the actors often influenced the audience's evaluation of the series. Therefore, sometimes the audience was more inclined to criticize the actors than the screenwriters. However, the screenwriter was also a very important part of the production of the series. Their creativity and ideas played a vital role in the quality of the entire series. Therefore, for a lousy drama, the entire production team needed to be scrutinized and criticized by the audience.
Why were there so many bad 80's horror novels?
In the 80s, horror was a booming genre in movies, and publishers thought they could replicate that success in books. But many writers were inexperienced or just trying to imitate what was popular rather than create something original. So, there were a lot of bad horror novels. Also, the market was flooded with so many of them that it was hard for the really good ones to stand out, and a lot of sub - par works got published.
Guo Jingming's movie is so bad, why are so many people watching it?
Guo Jingming was famous for his gorgeous writing style, rich emotions, and strong sense of the city. Although some people were dissatisfied with the quality of his films, his films still had a wide fan base among the audience. The reasons might be as follows: Guo Jingming's works often involve topics such as urban emotions and the pain of youth. These topics are very close to the life and emotional state of contemporary young people, so his works can resonate with young people. The quality of Guo Jingming's film production was uneven. Some of his works were not as good as expected, but they still achieved a certain amount of box office revenue and reputation. In addition, his songs and novels had also attracted many fans to watch and pursue. 3. Guo Jingming's works have a unique style and gorgeous language, which is easy to attract the attention of the audience. His works often involve topics such as fashion, beauty, and consumption, which can attract the attention and interest of some audiences. Guo Jingming's works have a certain influence in the literary world. His works can drive the development of related industries such as novel adaptation, film and television, literary creation, etc. This also brings a certain amount of traffic and income to his film and television works. Guo Jingming's films might have some problems with their quality, but the emotions, youth, and other topics in his works, as well as his unique style and industry-driven ability, all helped his films win a certain audience.
Why are there so many big-name actors in the celebration?
There were several reasons why " Celebrating Years " could attract so many big-name actors. First of all, the drama was adapted from Maoni's novel. It was very popular and well-known, which provided a platform for the actors to showcase their acting skills. Secondly, the drama's investment was stable and abundant, which could attract old actors with artistic pursuits and young artists with rising careers. In addition, the characters in the play were complex and challenging, which could attract actors to challenge themselves and show their acting skills. Finally, the production team of the drama was experienced in their work. Their level in the script and director also attracted the actors to join. All in all, these factors had contributed to the fact that " Celebrating Years " had been able to hire so many big-name actors.
Why are there so many big-name actors in the celebration?
There were a few reasons why " Celebrating Years " could invite so many big-name actors. First of all, the drama was adapted from Maoni's novel. It was very popular and well-known, which provided a platform for the actors to showcase their acting skills. Secondly, the drama's investment was stable and abundant, which could attract old actors with artistic pursuits and young artists with rising careers. In addition, the characters in the play were complex and challenging, which could attract actors to challenge themselves and show their acting skills. Finally, the production team of the drama was experienced in their work. Their level in the script and director also attracted the actors to join. All in all, these factors had contributed to the fact that " Celebrating Years " had managed to hire so many big-name actors.
Why are there so many big-name actors in the celebration?
There were a few reasons why " Celebrating Years " could invite so many big-name actors. First of all, the drama was adapted from Maoni's novel. It was very popular and well-known, which provided a platform for the actors to showcase their acting skills. Secondly, the drama's investment was stable and abundant, which could attract old actors with artistic pursuits and young artists with rising careers. In addition, the characters in the play were complex and challenging, which could attract actors to challenge themselves and show their acting skills. Finally, the production team of the drama was experienced in their work. Their level in the script and director also attracted the actors to join. All in all, these factors had contributed to the fact that " Celebrating Years " had been able to hire so many big-name actors.
Why no one is talking about this novel?
It could be that the story is too niche. If it focuses on a very specific topic or genre that only a small number of people are interested in, not many will talk about it. For example, if it's a novel about a very rare historical event that only a few historians are familiar with, the general public might not be attracted to it. Also, the writing style could be a factor. If it's too complex or too simplistic, it might not appeal to a wide range of readers.
The plot was the soul of the movie, so why was the director's status higher than the scriptwriter?
Although the plot was the soul of the movie, the director still played a vital role in the production of the movie. The director had a unique understanding and creativity of the overall visual and story expression of the movie, which could directly affect the effect of the movie and the emotional reaction of the audience. Therefore, the director had a relatively high status in the film production. He was one of the core technical personnel in the film production team and one of the most important decision makers in the film production process. The director was usually responsible for the creativity, visual design, story structure, and shooting plan of the film. He needed to think deeply and plan in many aspects. They needed to come up with unique story ideas and visual designs based on the movie's theme, genre, audience, budget, and other factors to ensure that the entire film production process ran smoothly. At the same time, the director had to work closely with the screenwriter, cameraman, actors, and other production staff to ensure the overall quality and effect of the film. Although screenwriters played a very important role in film production, compared to directors, screenwriters were mainly responsible for creating storylines and character settings, while directors needed to think more deeply and be creative in these aspects. Therefore, in film production, the director often paid more attention to the overall visual and story expression of the film, while the scriptwriter paid more attention to the development and advancement of the story. Although the director's role and status in the film production were relatively high, they also needed to work closely with the screenwriter, production staff, and other team members to create an excellent film.
Why is Feng Yun 1 so good and Feng Yun 2 so bad? I'm talking about the soap opera
Feng Yun 1 was a 1990s the mainland of China series directed by Stephen Chou and the first in the series, which narrated the martial arts story of Feng Yun. The drama received high reviews and box office sales in the mainland of China, and was hailed as a classic of Chinese TV dramas. However, Wind and Cloud 2 did not reach the heights of Wind and Cloud 1. This might be related to the production level of the show, the cast, the plot setting, and other factors. Even though Wind and Cloud 2 also had Stephen's wonderful performance, the performance of the other actors and the plot was not satisfactory, resulting in different reviews from the audience. In addition, due to the fact that the setting of Wind and Cloud 2 was different from the Wuxia world of Wind and Cloud 1, some viewers felt that the plot of the drama was not coherent and exciting enough. However, there were also some advantages to the show, such as the production of costumes and special effects, as well as the performance of the actors.
Why are so many novels based on games bad?
Well, one reason could be that they often fail to capture the essence and excitement of the game. Maybe the storylines feel forced or don't do justice to the game's world.
Was the bad review of 'Ode to Shangyang' because of the actors or the script? Was there a problem with Zhang Ziyi's acting?
The reason why Ode to Shangyang received a bad review was probably because its plot and performance were not outstanding enough, not because of the actors. Ode to Shangyang was one of the ancient Chinese literary works. Its plot and performance were not well received. People might have different opinions about Zhang Ziyi's acting skills. Zhang Ziyi was a very outstanding actress, and her acting skills were well recognized. However, a person's acting skills were not determined by a single factor. There were many other factors that needed to be considered, such as character setting, director, filming techniques, and so on. Whether it's the actors or the script, it shouldn't affect our evaluation of 'Ode to Shangyang'. We should look at literary works and actors 'performances objectively instead of blindly giving good or bad reviews.