What are narrative and argumentative historical materials?
Declarative historical materials and argumentative historical materials were two different types of historical materials used to record and preserve information about historical events and people, as well as to provide explanations and analysis of these information. Declarative historical materials were records of historical events and people, such as historical maps, cultural relics, inscriptions, contracts, documents, etc. These historical materials could provide basic information such as the location, time, people, events, and other details related to the event. Demonstrating historical materials provided information on the causes, consequences, and effects of historical events and characters, such as research, analysis, and evaluation by historians. These historical materials could provide information on the motives, purposes, and effects of historical events and characters, as well as analysis and explanation of the causes, consequences, and effects of historical events. In the study of history, both narrative and argumentative historical materials are very important, but there are also some differences between the two. Declarative historical materials were mainly used to provide information about historical events and figures, while argumentative historical materials were mainly used to provide information about the causes, consequences, and effects of historical events and figures. At the same time, the argumentative historical materials also needed to be analyzed by the narrative historical materials and other historical materials to draw the correct conclusion.
The difference between narrative and argumentative historical materials
Declarative historical materials and argumentative historical materials were two different types of historical materials. The narrative historical materials referred to the historical materials that recorded and described historical events, people, places, etc. The purpose was to let the readers understand historical facts and background. These historical materials usually did not have their own point of view or standpoint. They only objectively recorded and described historical events. Demonstrating historical materials referred to historical materials collected in order to prove a certain point of view or conclusion. It was intended to support or refute a certain point of view or conclusion. These historical materials usually contained the author's own views or positions and would collect and analyze various historical materials as much as possible to prove their views or conclusions. Therefore, the main difference between narrative historical materials and argumentative historical materials was the purpose and content of the historical materials. The purpose of narrative historical materials is to let the reader understand historical facts and background, while the purpose of argumentative historical materials is to support or refute a certain point or conclusion.
What was the use of narrative and argumentative expressions? fast
Narration and discussion were two common ways of expression in novels, each with different functions. Narration was the process of describing the story and the plot so that the readers could understand the background of the story, the relationship between the characters, the development of the story, and so on, so as to better understand the novel. The role of narration was to convey information, portray characters, and create an atmosphere. The discussion was to evaluate and analyze the story, reveal the meaning and enlightenment of the story, and let the readers think about the theme and values of the novel. The function of discussion was to guide the readers to think, deepen the theme of the novel, and shape the characters. Therefore, the use of narration and discussion in the novel should be decided according to the needs of the plot and theme.
What was the difference between lyrical, argumentative, and narrative?
Lyricism, discussion, description, and narration were commonly used expressions in literature. The main differences lay in their emotional color, logic, and literary effects. Lyricism usually expressed the author's emotions, thoughts, and feelings, allowing the reader to feel the author's inner world. Lyrical articles often have a strong emotional color, and readers can deeply feel the author's emotional ups and downs and emotional changes. However, lyricism often falls into the predicament of excessive lyricism, causing the article to be too exaggerated and pretentious. Therefore, sometimes it is necessary to maintain appropriate rationality and objectively while expressing emotions. 2. Discussions usually express the author's views, opinions, and comments on a certain issue. An article with a discussion has a distinct point of view. The reader can clearly recognize the author's point of view and position. However, discussions were often too one-sided and subjective, resulting in the article lacking in objectively and universally. Therefore, it was necessary to maintain a moderate degree of objectively and modesty while expressing one's views. Description usually refers to the author's observations, feelings, and descriptions of a scene, character, or thing. The readers can intuitively feel the beauty, liveliness, and delicacy of the scenes, characters, or things described by the author. However, descriptions are often too dull and lack depth, so sometimes it is necessary to use appropriate rhetorical devices to enhance the literary effect of the article, such as metaphor, personification, contrast, etc. Narrations usually express the author's narration and record of an event, experience, or story. A narrative article is objective and rational. The reader can objectively recognize the authenticity and reliability of the stories and events told by the author. However, narrations are often too simple and lack liveliness, so sometimes it is necessary to use appropriate rhetorical devices to enhance the literary effect of the article, such as description, metaphor, contrast, etc.
What was the difference between lyrical, argumentative, and narrative?
Lyricism, discussion, description, and narration were the four basic ways of expression in literature. They had their own characteristics and functions. 1. Lyrical: The author's emotions and feelings are expressed through the description of the characters, scenery, or inner feelings. The reader can feel the author's emotional state. Lyrical works often emphasized the transmission of emotions and feelings. 2. Discussion: The author's views and attitudes are expressed through opinions and evaluations of events, characters, or things. The argumentative part of an argumentative essay usually includes the author's evaluation of events, people, or things, emphasizing the analysis and thinking of events, people, or things. 3. Description: It mainly shows the state and characteristics of people, scenery, or animals by describing the images and characteristics of the people, scenery, or animals. The description part of the article usually pays attention to details and vivid expressions so that the reader can feel the vivid image depicted by the author. 4. Narration: The author's experiences and feelings are expressed by describing the experiences and processes of events, characters, or things. The narrative part of a narrative usually focuses on the narrative and description of events, emphasizing the cohesiveness and logic of events. In literary works, lyricism, discussion, description, and narration are often intertwined to achieve a better expression. Different ways of expression can make readers feel different emotions and atmosphere, and at the same time, it can help the author better express his inner feelings and thoughts.
What was the difference between lyrical, argumentative, and narrative?
Lyricism, discussion, description, and narration were the four commonly used expressions in literature. The specific differences were as follows: Lyric: It is used to express the author's emotions, feelings, and thoughts. It is usually based on poetry, prose, and other literary works. Lyricism was a direct expression of the author's inner feelings and thoughts, allowing the reader to feel the author's emotional changes and inner world. 2. Commentary: By stating the author's point of view and evaluating things, people, or events, the author's thoughts, attitudes, and positions are expressed. The characteristic of discussion was that the author's analysis and evaluation of things were logical and profound. 3. Description: By describing characters, scenery, situations, and other images, it shows the character's personality, appearance, psychology, behavior, and other characteristics. The characteristic of description is to express the image and characteristics of things through the language and actions of the image, with a vivid and vivid sense. 4. Narration: By recording people, events, situations, and other historical things, the author's thoughts and feelings about the past, present, or future are expressed. The characteristics of narration were to record things in the order of time, space, and events, paying attention to the integrity and logic of the events. Different ways of expression have different characteristics and functions. Lyricism is usually used to express feelings and thoughts, to discuss, to elaborate opinions and evaluate things, to describe, to express images and characteristics, to record historical events and people's experiences. In literary works, different ways of expression can also be combined to achieve a more vivid and profound expression.
What was the difference between lyrical, argumentative, and narrative?
Lyricism, discussion, description, and narration are the four basic ways of expression in literature. The main difference lies in the content and emotional color expressed. 1. Lyric: Mainly express the author's emotions and feelings so that the reader can feel the emotional changes in the author's heart. Lyricism usually took the form of poetry, prose, and other literary works. 2. Discussion: Mainly express the author's views and opinions on things, emphasizing the author's understanding and understanding of things. Discussions usually took the form of argumentative articles and comments. 3. Description: Mainly express the author's description of the appearance, behavior, psychology, etc. of things so that readers can feel the author's detailed observation and in-depth understanding of things. The descriptions were usually in the form of novels and narrations. 4. Narration: Mainly to express the author's narration of events, characters, scenery, etc., so that the reader can understand the occurrence, development, and ending of the event. Narrations usually took the form of novels and essays. In literary works, lyricism, discussion, description, and narration were often used in turn to achieve a more profound effect.
How to distinguish between argumentative and lyrical expressions in a narrative
The argumentative and lyrical expressions in narrative works have different functions and meanings in literature. The specific differences are as follows: 1. Ways of expressing discussion: The main purpose of argumentative expression was to express the author's views and attitudes by expressing his views, evaluations, and reasoning about events, characters, and things. In narrative writing, discussion was usually used to point out the theme, highlight the thoughts, express the character, and reveal the meaning of the event. 2. Lyrical expression: Lyrical expression refers to the main purpose of expressing the author's thoughts and feelings by expressing the author's emotions, feelings, and experiences. Lyrical expressions were usually used to express the inner feelings of the characters, reveal the characters 'personalities, and express the theme. In a narrative, discussion and lyrical expressions were usually combined and could not be used separately. The use of comments and lyrical expressions can make the article more profound, vivid and touching. At the same time, he also needed to pay attention to the moderate use of these two expressions and not to be too extreme or abuse.
What are the advantages of using historical fiction in argumentative essays?
Historical fiction can add depth to your argument. It can show the human side of historical events. For example, in an essay about slavery, a fictional account of a slave's life can bring out the emotions, hardships, and the real - life experiences that statistics alone can't convey, strengthening your argument.
Looking for narrative materials about setbacks
Narrations: Frustration was a kind of experience, a kind of challenge, and a kind of growth. Frustration could be personal or team work. The following was a narrative material about setbacks: [Frustration Narration] I used to be a confident person who believed that I could overcome any difficulty. However, reality is always cruel and merciless. It makes me constantly face setbacks. I remember that when I was in high school, my class elected a class leader. I wanted to run but I wasn't elected. I was so lost and depressed that I started to doubt my own abilities. But I didn't give up. I continued to study and improve my ability. In the end, I was successfully elected as a class cadre and achieved good results in my work. Another time I was in a competition and I had a problem. I kept feeling nervous and uneasy during the game, but in the end, I successfully finished the game. This experience made me more confident and stronger. Although setbacks make us feel lost and depressed, they are also a kind of experience and growth. Through facing setbacks, we can constantly improve our ability to become stronger and more confident. So no matter what setbacks you encounter, don't give up easily. You have to face it bravely, learn from it, and grow.
The characteristics of the selection of materials in narrative writing
The characteristics of a narrative usually included the following aspects: 1. Truthfulness: Narrations generally require the use of authentic story material to make the reader feel the authenticity of events and emotions. 2. Representative: The material of the narrative must be representative enough to reflect the protagonist's personality, experience, emotions, etc., so that the reader can have a full understanding of the protagonist. 3. Prototype: The material of the narrative should be typical and reflect the characteristics of society, history, culture, etc., so that the readers have a deeper understanding of society. 4. Vividness: The material of the narrative should be vivid, so that the readers can feel the vivid and real events, and have a strong resonance and emotional reaction. 5. Novelty: The material of the narrative should be novel, able to reflect the sense of the times and innovation, so that the readers can feel the novelty and uniqueness of the event. The characteristics of the material selection of the narrative needed to be determined according to different reader groups and writing purposes. At the same time, it also needed to choose suitable materials according to different styles and writing styles.