Why did the textbooks say that there were no philosophers in ancient China?
There was indeed no such thing as a philosopher in ancient China because the development of ancient Chinese philosophy could be traced back to the ancient Chinese tradition of thinking, and philosophers were the concept of Western philosophy. The development of ancient Chinese philosophy can be traced back to ancient Chinese cultural traditions and thinking traditions, including Taoism, Confucianism, Mohism, Legalism, and many other schools of thought. These schools of thought had a profound influence on ancient Chinese history and had a profound influence on ancient Chinese culture and thought. Most of the ancient Chinese philosophers were ideologists. They focused on practicality and solving practical problems instead of focusing on speculation and theoretical construction like Western philosophers. Therefore, the ancient Chinese philosophers were rarely classified as philosophers, but more often classified as philosophers or the representative figures of philosophers. The development of ancient Chinese philosophy was very different from the development of Western philosophy, so textbooks usually did not regard ancient China as the field of philosophers.
Why are there only philosophers in China?
This is a controversial issue. Some people think that China does lack philosophers, while others think that China has many philosophers. However, as far as I know, China does lack a systematic and influential philosophical system like Western philosophers. The origin of Chinese philosophy can be traced back to ancient times, but with the passage of time, Chinese philosophy has developed unique characteristics and styles. Chinese philosophy emphasized on morality, culture, society, and history. It paid more attention to personal feelings and experiences rather than logic and rational analysis like Western philosophy. In addition, the development of Chinese philosophy was influenced by many factors such as politics, religion, and cultural traditions, which led to the complexity of the philosophical system. There were many famous Chinese philosophers, such as Confucius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Mozi, Xunzi, Mencius, Han Feizi, etc. Their ideas had a profound impact on China and the world, but due to the lack of a unified philosophical system, the ideas of these philosophers had not been systematically organized. Therefore, although there were indeed many philosophers in China, due to the lack of a unified philosophical system, Chinese philosophy was not as widely spread and influenced as Western philosophy.
Why are there so few philosophers in China with global influence?
The reason why there were fewer philosophers in China with international influence was mainly because the history of Chinese culture and philosophy was relatively short and was influenced by many factors such as politics and economy. China's cultural tradition has a long history, but in history, the industrial revolution in Europe and the gradual rise of Western philosophy led to the gradual stop of the exchange between Chinese culture and world philosophy. China's political system was different from that of other western countries, which easily limited the development of philosophical systems. China's feudal society and Confucian ideology had always influenced the development of Chinese philosophy, while the development of western ideology, such as democratic thinking and scientific thinking, had impacted this tradition to a certain extent. Chinese philosophy tended to focus more on personal cultivation and interpersonal relationships than on solving practical problems. This also made it difficult for Chinese philosophy to gain widespread recognition and influence in the world of philosophy. However, in recent years, the field of philosophy in China has gradually received attention. The works of some Chinese philosophers have also begun to be translated into other languages and have been recognized by the world's philosophical community. For example, the thoughts of the Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu were regarded as the source of Taoist philosophy by the Western philosophy community, which had an important impact on the development of Western philosophy.
Why were novels not valued in ancient China?
In ancient China, novels were not as important as they were now. In ancient China, novels were regarded as a frivolous art form, mainly for entertainment and enlightenment. In the feudal society, novels were regarded as " light objects " and only nobles and literati could read and write them. In addition, novels in ancient China also faced many restrictions, such as word count, plot, and character creation. Although the creation of ancient Chinese novels was once restricted, there were still some excellent works such as Dream of the Red Chamber, Water Margins, Journey to the West, etc. These works were regarded as classics in the history of Chinese literature and had a profound influence on Chinese culture.
Why did China produce ideologists and politicians while the West produced philosophers, scientists, and inventor?
The answer to this question is not simple. The history, culture, and social environment of China and the West are very different, which leads to different needs and contributions to ideologists and politicians. In Chinese history and culture, the role of ideologists and politicians is very important because they provide a way to think and understand the world. China had a long cultural tradition, including Confucianism, Taoism, Mohism, Legalism and many other schools of thought. These schools of thought had a profound impact on Chinese history and culture. There were also many famous politicians in China, such as Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Laozi, etc. Their ideas had a huge impact on the development of Chinese culture. In the history and culture of the West, philosophers, scientists, and inventor played an equally important role. The West had rich cultural traditions, including ancient Greek philosophy, Roman politics, medieval religion, modern science, and so on. These cultural traditions provided the foundation for the development of Western thought, and produced many outstanding philosophers, scientists, and inventor such as Plato, aristotle, Newton, Einstein, and edict. The differences in history, culture, and social environment between China and the West led to different needs and contributions to ideologists and politicians.
Why did ancient China not have science?
Although ancient China had a long history and culture, its development in the field of science had always been lagging behind. This may be related to the political, economic, social and cultural environment of ancient China, as well as the influence of ancient Chinese philosophy. Ancient Chinese philosophy emphasized morality, ethics, and belief, while ignoring science. Ancient Chinese philosophers usually paid less attention to natural phenomena and the way the universe worked, but more attention to human emotions and behavior. This way of thinking could hinder the development of science. The education system in ancient China was not open and modern. The progress of science and technology required practice and experimentation, but the education system of ancient China lacked such opportunities for practice and experimentation. Even so, there were many ancient Chinese philosophers and scientists such as Mozi, Lao Tzu, Confucius, Zhang Heng, etc. Their contributions to science and technology could not be ignored.
China's top ten philosophers
There was no exact list of the top ten philosophers in China because philosophers had a wide range of research fields and contributions. The following are some of the important figures who are considered to be Chinese philosophers: 1 Confucius (Zhōu Gōng) -Ancient Chinese philosopher, teacher, and ideologist who is considered the founder of Confucianism. 2. Laozi-an important representative of the ancient Chinese philosopher Taoism. 3 Mozi (M) -The main representative of the ancient Chinese philosopher Mohism. 4. Zhuangzi-An important representative of the Taoist ideology of ancient Chinese philosophers. 5 Xunzi (Táng Z) -An important representative of Confucianism in ancient China. 6 Han Feizi-Ancient Chinese philosopher, an important representative of Legalism. 7 Li Si-An important representative of the Legalism of ancient Chinese philosophers. 8 Sun Tzu () -An important representative of the ancient Chinese philosophers 'military thoughts. 9. Plato-One of the most important representatives of ancient Greek philosophy. 10 Aristippus-Ancient Greek philosopher, one of the important representatives of Western philosophy.
Why did the ancient Chinese say,"A scholar is useless"?
This sentence originated from an ancient Chinese story. In the story, a scholar was rejected by the employer because he only knew how to read and lacked practical skills and practical experience. In the end, he could not find a job. The story reflected the criticism of scholars in ancient China, who believed that they only focused on theoretical knowledge and lacked practical skills, unable to play a role in their work. Therefore, the phrase " a useless scholar " became a way of belittling scholars. However, it should be noted that the meaning of this sentence did not mean that scholars were useless, but that they lacked practical application ability. In ancient society, scholars were a group of highly educated professionals. Their duty was to study classical literature and Confucian ideas and use them to guide people's lives and behavior. Although the theoretical knowledge of scholars is very important, they need to apply this knowledge to practical life in order to better serve the society. Therefore, the meaning of this sentence was to criticize those who only paid attention to theoretical research and lacked practical experience instead of belittling all scholars.
Why did classical Chinese appear in ancient China?
Why did classical Chinese appear in ancient China? The classical Chinese was a written language in ancient China, which was very different from modern Chinese. It originated in the Warring States Period, developed in the Han Dynasty, and gradually matured after the Tang Dynasty. The emergence of classical Chinese was related to the politics, economy, culture and other factors of ancient China. In ancient China, the feudal society had a high concentration of power, and literary inquisition also happened from time to time. On one hand, the emergence of classical Chinese was to limit the use of language by officials to avoid the occurrence of literary inquisition; on the other hand, it was to better express ideas and culture. There are great differences between classical Chinese and modern Chinese in terms of language, grammar, vocabulary, etc. Its grammar structure is complex, using many ancient words and idioms, but also has a unique way of expression and rhetoric. These characteristics made classical Chinese have a unique advantage in expressing ideas and transmitting information. The classical Chinese is an important part of the ancient Chinese culture, which has a profound influence on the ancient Chinese literature and culture. It is also the foundation of modern Chinese writing and plays an important role in the development of modern Chinese.
Why did ancient China not have a copyright law?
Ancient China did not have a copyright law because the Chinese legal system had already been formed as early as the Spring and Autumn Period. The copyright law was proposed by the European Enlightenment philosophers in the early 20th century. The copyright protection of literary works in ancient Chinese laws mainly relied on the copyrights of ancient poems, Fu, and other literary works such as The Book of Songs and The Songs of Chu. These works already had intellectual property rights when they were created, so the author's copyright was protected by the law at that time. However, the ancient Chinese law did not clarify the ownership of the copyright of literary works like the modern copyright law. During the Warring States Period, some vassal states had a vague treatment of the copyright ownership of literary works, which also led to some disputes about the copyright protection of ancient Chinese literary works. In addition, ancient Chinese laws did not provide sufficient protection for the copyright of literary works. In most cases, the copyright of a work would not be protected by law, and the rights and interests of the creator might not be fully protected. Therefore, although there were some copyrights of literary works in ancient China, due to the lack of clear legal protection, these rights and interests were not fully protected.
Why did ancient China not have long epics?
The main reason why there were no long epics in ancient China was that the ancient Chinese literary tradition emphasized conciseness in narration, while epics usually needed to describe a large number of characters, historical events, and plots, so it was difficult to maintain a long form. There were also many excellent long narrative works in ancient Chinese literature, such as Dream of the Red Chamber, Journey to the West, and Water Margins. Although these works were long, the plots were compact and the characters were vivid, which had a strong appeal and artistic value. In contrast, epics are generally regarded as a more epic work. The purpose is to show heroic deeds and pass on historical knowledge. Therefore, it pays more attention to the continuity of the plot and the accuracy of the narrative rather than the long form. In addition, the historical records and legends of ancient China were often relatively simple. The lack of detailed historical records and archaeological evidence also affected the credibility and authenticity of epics. Therefore, the long epics of ancient China may be preserved and inherited more as a cultural heritage and literary tradition rather than as a real historical record.