If there was nothing wrong with an article, but there were many people reporting it, would it be banned?
If an article itself had no problems, but there were many people reporting it, it might not be banned. This depended on the speed and intensity of the platform's handling of reports. Some platforms will actively review the content of the report and take appropriate measures, while others may not have enough resources and capabilities to deal with a large number of reports. If an article was reported by a large number of platforms, they might consider reviewing and adjusting it to ensure its quality and safety. For example, the platform might modify or review the content, style, plot, and other aspects of the article to reduce the number of reports. In addition, the platform may strengthen the management and protection of authors and works to protect the rights and safety of readers. However, even if there were no problems with the article itself, there might be other problems such as plagiarism, copyright infringement, etc., which could also lead to too many reports. Therefore, the platform needed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and inspection when reviewing articles to ensure their legitimacy and authenticity. If an article is reported by too many people, the platform may consider reviewing and adjusting it to ensure its quality and safety. However, whether it would be banned depended on the platform's decision-making and execution ability.