" Beautiful Scholar " was ridiculed repeatedly when it started broadcasting. Was the plot melodramatic or the actors 'acting skills not up to par?
After the broadcast of " Beautiful Scholar ", it received a lot of criticism from the audience. Some people thought that the plot was too melodramatic, while others thought that the actors 'acting skills were not up to par. However, as a fan of online literature, I can help you summarize the possible reasons: [1. The plot is melodramatic: " Beautiful Scholar " is a fantasy web novel. The plot may be a little jumpy and lack logic, which may make the audience feel a little confused.] In addition, some of the settings and plots in the novel might be novel and difficult for the audience to accept. 2. The actor's acting skills were not up to standard. The actor's performance was also one of the reasons why the audience might complain. Some actors may not understand the role well, and some actors may not be fully prepared, resulting in them not performing well enough in the role. However, whether it was the melodramatic plot or the actors 'acting skills, they should not be the only criteria to evaluate a work. As an online novel, the story and plot of " Beautiful Scholar " might be more attractive, and the performance of the actors might only be a part of it. Ultimately, the audience's evaluation of this work might vary from person to person.
The new version of Meteor Garden was being ridiculed. Was it because of the plot or because the actors 'acting skills were not up to par?
The new version of Meteor Garden was criticized mainly because of the plot and the performance of the actors. In terms of the plot, the new version of Meteor Garden had been adapted from the original version and added some modern elements. However, the plot was too fast and the plot logic was insufficient. Some of the scenes were also somewhat unreasonable. In addition, the lines and expression management of the play also received some criticism. One of the reasons why the new version of Meteor Garden was ridiculed was that the actors 'acting skills were not up to par. Some actors 'performances were too exaggerated, and some characters' images and personalities did not match the original works, making it difficult for the audience to resonate with them. In general, the new version of Meteor Garden had some problems with the plot and the performance of the actors, which made it unable to meet the expectations of the audience and became the object of ridicule.
" I'll Wait for You at the End of Time " had a Douban rating of 3.7. Was it because the actors 'acting skills weren't up to par or the plot was too routine?
" I'll Wait for You at the End of Time " was a famous novel with ups and downs. It told the story of the protagonist, Lin Qingxuan, who accidentally transmigrated to a strange world. In this world, he encountered many difficulties and challenges, and at the same time, he made many allies and enemies. The novel's Douban rating was 37. Although the rating was not very high, it could not be simply attributed to the actors 'acting skills or the plot being too routine. The plot in the novel might have some tricks, but there were also many highlights. For example, the love between Lin Qingxuan and Su Ming was one of the most touching parts of the novel. In addition, the characters in the novel were more well-developed. Each character had its own unique personality and story background. Therefore, the low rating of " I'll Wait for You at the End of Time " on Douban was probably due to the dull content of the novel itself rather than the actors 'acting skills or the flaws in the plot.
The plot of " Requiem " was ridiculed. Why did the acting skills of the two main actors get recognized without the script itself?
" Requiem " was a fantasy drama that starred Wu Lei and Bai Yu. The plot of the drama was often ridiculed because the plot was complicated and sometimes difficult to sort out. There were also a lot of fantasy elements that confused the audience. However, the acting skills of the actors in the drama were recognized, especially the performance of the two main leads. Wu Lei's main character, Shen Qingqiu, was a young man with a complicated background. His growing up experience and mental journey were displayed in a very delicate way that resonated with the audience. Zhao Yunlan, played by Bai Yu, was a man of justice with a firm belief. His distinctive character and outstanding character made the audience's love and respect for him rise spontaneously. In addition, the cast of the drama was also very strong. The acting skills of Wu Lei and Bai Yu were excellent, and their acting skills were not only limited to the drama but also widely praised by the audience. Therefore, although the plot of " Requiem " was criticized, the actors 'acting skills were recognized, which had a positive impact on the future development of the show.
Was Wu Jinyan's acting skills ridiculed?
Yes, Wu Jinyan's acting skills in the TV series " Ink Rain and Clouds " had been ridiculed by some viewers. According to reference 2 and reference 4, some viewers thought that her performance in the play was "stuck with big eyes and red eyes", that she was not mature enough in emotional scenes, and that she lacked talent in acting. However, this was only the opinion of a portion of the audience. Different people might have different opinions on the evaluation of actors 'acting skills. " Ink Rain Clouds " was adapted from the famous author of Yuewen Group, Qian Shan Tea Guest's " The Daughter of a Diwife ". The original work was also very exciting. Click on the link below to start reading!
'Ode to Shangyang' had an unstable reputation when it started broadcasting. Which characters in the drama had classic acting skills?
" Ode to Shangyang " was a TV series adapted from the novel of the same name by Bai Juyi, a writer of the Tang Dynasty. Its reputation was unstable after it was broadcasted. However, the acting skills of some of the characters in the play were still praised. Here are some of the classic performances of some of them: 1 Li Yishan: As the male lead of the play, Li Yishan's performance was widely regarded as a classic. He was able to express his character's inner emotions through his eyes, gestures, and subtle facial expressions, allowing the audience to feel his true charm. 2. Lu Lun: Lu Lun played the role of Bai Juyi's second son in the drama, and his performance was also well received. He was able to express the emotions of his character through his delicate facial expressions and tone of voice, allowing the audience to feel his true feelings. 3. Li Bai: Li Bai is one of the villains in the play. His performance is also very good. He was able to express his character's inner contradictions and complex emotions through his eyes, body language, and lines, allowing the audience to feel his charm and talent. 4. Yoo Woosuk: Yoo Woosuk is one of the main characters of the play. His performance is also very good. He was able to express the emotions and personality of his characters through his lines, eyes, and body language, allowing the audience to feel his true charm. The above are the performances of some of the highly acclaimed actors in Shangyang Ode. Their superb acting skills have added a lot of highlights to the play and also made the audience feel the charm of Tang Dynasty literature and the complexity of the historical background.
Scoring of Actors 'Acting Skills
We can come up with some acting ratings for the actors of " Zhao Liying received a 9.5 rating for her acting in the movie, while Ma Li received an 8.7 rating. However, these ratings might not be the most accurate because different search results gave different ratings. Other than that, there were also some other actors 'ratings. Lei Jiayin, for example, received 9.3 points. In general, there was a certain gap between Zhao Liying and Mary's acting skills.
Celebrating the Acting Skills of the Actors
Qing Yuannian's acting skills had mixed reviews. Chen Daoming's Qing Emperor was considered one of the best actors with a score of 9.6. He successfully displayed the complexity and depth of the character. Chen Pingping, played by Wu Gang, also received a high score of 9.5 points. He displayed the characteristics of good planning and courage in the play. Although Zhang Ruoyun's Fan Xian was given a score of 6.0, his acting skills were still recognized. Other actors such as Li Qin and Li Xiaoran also received some praise. However, there was no clear evaluation of Xiao Zhan's acting skills in the Qing Dynasty. Therefore, I am not sure about Xiao Zhan's acting skills.
Which movies and TV series were well received when they first started broadcasting, but ended up being ridiculed by netizens?
Many movies and television dramas were well received before they started broadcasting, but they suffered a failure at the end and were ridiculed by netizens. For example, Game of Thrones was well received when it first aired, but many loopholes and plot collapses in the final season caused many viewers to be disappointed and dissatisfied. Chu Qiao's Legend was also an example. When it started broadcasting, it received good reviews. However, in the last few episodes, the plot collapsed and the character development direction was unclear, causing many viewers to be dissatisfied. There were also other TV series and movies such as Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and Titanic that received widespread praise before they were released, but there were also problems in the ending that caused controversy and criticism from the audience.
'The Second Time Is Beautiful' had just started broadcasting, so why did the audience say that its plot was very melodramatic?
" The Second Time Is Beautiful " was an online novel. The plot direction and plot setting were relatively novel, so it attracted the attention and anticipation of a portion of the audience. However, due to the complexity of the plot, some viewers might not fully understand and digest the plot, resulting in different reviews. In addition, the plot of the novel might sometimes involve some emotional plots, such as the character's secret love, misunderstanding, betrayal, etc. These plots might cause different reactions from the audience. Some viewers might feel that these plots were too melodramatic and did not meet their expectations and understanding. The audience's evaluation of " The Second Time Is Beautiful " might be subjective and biased, which was one of the reasons for the different evaluations. However, as an online novel, the quality of the plot and the plot setting still needed to be tested and approved by the readers and time.
Xiao Zhan's acting skills were ridiculed
Xiao Zhan's acting skills in " Celebrating Years " were ridiculed by some viewers. Some people thought that his expression was too calm and lacked change. Some people even described him as being dumbstruck. There were also people who criticized his ugly eyes and felt that his acting skills were not good enough. However, there were also people who praised Xiao Zhan's acting skills. They felt that the Yan Bingyun he played in the play was a stark contrast to the Fan Xian played by Zhang Ruoyun, and that he needed quick reflexes. Although there were some voices of doubt, there were also people who were positive about Xiao Zhan's acting skills. In general, Xiao Zhan's acting skills in " Celebrating Years " had received some controversy.