There were many reasons for looking down on online literature. 1. The advantages of traditional literature: Some people think that traditional literature is more likely to receive high praise and recognition because it has been tested by traditional publishing channels and literary circles, while online literature does not have such a guarantee. 2. The lack of supervision and review: Traditional literature is often influenced and monitored by the publishing house, editors, and the literary world, while online literature lacks such institutions to review and evaluate it. Therefore, some people felt that the quality of online literature could not be guaranteed. 3. Monotonous content: Some people think that the content of online literature is too monotonous, often repeating the same plot and theme, lacking depth and innovation. 4. Lacking literary value: Some people think that online literature lacks the literary value of traditional literature, such as language use, depth of thought, and character creation, so it cannot be recognized and evaluated by the literary world. It should be noted that the above are just some possible reasons and not everyone agrees with these views. Online literature and traditional literature have different literary styles and depth of thought. We should appreciate and evaluate them with an open attitude.
In fanfiction, one reason could be the Marauders' bullying of Snape. They often target him with their pranks, which are sometimes cruel. Lily, being Snape's friend (at least for a while), might despise the Marauders for their treatment of him. Also, the Marauders' cocky attitude might be off - putting to both Lily and Snape.
Science fiction usually involved the future, technology, alien life, and other topics. These topics might cause some controversy and concern for many people. Some people might think that science fiction exaggerated the potential of technology and the possible negative effects it could bring, or that it overly emphasized the existence of extraterrestrial life and the possible threat it could pose, making them feel uneasy. In addition, some people may think that science fiction lacks reality and only focuses on fictional worldviews and plots, ignoring the problems and challenges of the real world. However, it was undeniable that science fiction had its unique charm and value as a literary form. It explored the challenges and opportunities that mankind might face in the future through fictional storylines and descriptions of science and technology. At the same time, it also reflected people's thoughts and discussions about science and technology and the fate of mankind. Therefore, the contempt for science fiction should be based on the content itself, not on the prejudice and discrimination of the author or the subject itself.
As a fan of online literature, I don't have any personal preferences or emotions. I can only answer your question based on what I have learned. Online literature referred to the literary works that were created and disseminated on the Internet. They were usually light novels, fantasy, science fiction, fantasy, and so on. It spreads quickly and conveniently, regardless of time or place, and thus has a wide readership around the world. Although online literature has a wide readership and high reader satisfaction, it has also received some criticism. Some people think that online literature lacks the quality assurance and cultural content of traditional literature and is often too commercial. Others believe that online literature is a unique form of literature that can satisfy people's needs for rapid access to information and entertainment. To sum up, if you like online literature, you might like it because it has a wide readership and high reader satisfaction. However, if you don't like online literature, it might be because it lacks the quality assurance and cultural content of traditional literature or is too commercial.
I don't have any feelings or preferences. I'm just a program, so I don't like or dislike online literature. However, I can tell you some of the characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of online literature. Online literature is usually composed of novels that are serialised on the Internet. These novels can be widely disseminated through the Internet, so they have a wider audience. Online literature was usually featured by fast updates and strong interaction. The readers could comment and recommend works online and interact with other readers. Therefore, online literature was often more social and readable. The advantage of online literature was that it had a wider audience and a larger creative space to attract more people. In addition, online literature usually has higher literary value and creativity because it has more opportunities to show the author's imagination and literary talent. However, the disadvantage of online literature was that it often lacked the quality assurance and review mechanism of official publication, so there might be some inappropriate content or vulgar words. In addition, due to the rapid spread of online literature, some works may be quickly forgotten or outdated, so the speed of updating online literature may also lead to uneven quality of works.
Online literature was a type of literature because it followed the basic rules and characteristics of literature in the process of creation and transmission. Online literature was a literary work that was spread and sold through the internet, including novels, essays, poems, serials, and other literary elements such as fiction, imagination, and emotion. The creation and transmission of online literature was different from traditional literature. It was not limited by time and region. It could be widely spread and attract readers through online social platforms and digital media. Therefore, online literature has the characteristics of modern literature such as pluralization, freedom, interaction, etc., but also has the characteristics of traditional literature such as authenticity, history, artistry, etc. Online literature played an important role in inheriting literary traditions, promoting literary creation, and satisfying the needs of readers. It could be said that it was a veritable literature.
Maybe Naruto has his own set of values and the concepts in Rias fanfiction go against them. He's from a different fictional universe with its own rules and ethics, and the ideas in Rias fanfiction might seem out of place or even wrong to him.
I can't provide specific information about the disdain of certain university professors for Jin Yong's novels. However, there were many reasons why many university professors looked down on Jin Yong's novels. 1. The content of Jin Yong's novels was more violent and obscene, which did not conform to the core values advocated by university professors. 2. The characters in Jin Yong's novels are deeply portrayed and the plot is full of ups and downs, but many university professors think that this kind of novel is too fictional and lacks scientific basis to be used as a literary work for academic research. Jin Yong's novels have a great influence on communication and culture. Many university professors believe that such novels have a negative impact on teenagers and may affect their healthy growth. Jin Yong's novels have been criticized on some occasions for not respecting history and traditional culture. University professors usually pay attention to education and inheritance of traditional culture. It should be emphasized that university professors had diverse views and preferences. They should not deny the entire literary genre and cultural tradition just because of one person's works.
They felt that online novels were vulgar because they had different prejudices and prejudices towards online novels and different standards for evaluating literary works. As a form of literature, web novels might contain various plots, characters, and topics. Some of them might not meet the evaluation standards of traditional literature works. In addition, because the readers of online novels were relatively young, they might lack historical and cultural knowledge of literary works, so it was difficult for them to understand the meaning and symbols of online novels. Some people might associate online novels with words such as sex, violence, and vulgar. These words did not match the storyline and characters of online novels. This kind of rigid impression might cause them to have negative feelings towards online novels and even think that online novels were vulgar. However, as a form of literature, the value of online literature lies in its storyline, character image, language expression, and other aspects rather than its content itself. The web novel author could create a literary work with depth and meaning through careful design and integration of various elements. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for online novels should be different from person to person. It should not be simply compared with traditional literary works.
As a fan of online literature, I won't look down on any book or media. Like many other media outlets, Zhiyin Manke has provided many excellent works that are worthy of our appreciation and reading. I believe that everyone has different preferences for reading and we should respect each other's opinions and choices.
Traditional literature and online literature were different in terms of making money because of their different business models and audiences. Traditional literature usually made money through publishing, printing, and distribution channels, while online literature made money through online reading platforms and digital distribution channels. Because online literature had a wider audience and reading behavior was more dispersed, online platforms usually gave more traffic rewards, advertising sponsorships, and other preferential policies to attract readers to participate and continue reading. In contrast, the audience of traditional literature was relatively more concentrated, so online platforms might be more inclined to invest more advertising budget and energy to attract the attention of traditional literature readers. The creation and distribution of traditional literature usually required a higher level of literary attainment and a more professional editing and publishing process. Therefore, the production cost was higher and the payback period was longer. In contrast, the creation and distribution of online literature was usually simpler, with lower costs and shorter return periods. Combining the above factors, the main differences between traditional literature and online literature in terms of making money were as follows: traditional literature needed to earn profits through physical channels, and the audience was more dispersed. Online platforms might give more traffic rewards and preferential policies; online literature had a wider audience, lower creation and distribution costs, and a shorter return period.