Is there such a big difference between the sons of concubines in history and those written in novels?
There might be some differences between the Di Shu son in history and the Di Shu son described in novels. Di Shu son referred to the son who held the main position in the family. It was usually determined by the father or grandfather and passed down in the family. In novels and culture, Di Shu Zi was often used to describe the difference in social status and wealth, especially in ancient China. However, the history of Di Shu children was not necessarily as complicated as depicted in novels. In most cases, the relationship between the sons of Di and Shu was relatively equal. They might have different talents and talents, but they were all equally important in the entire family. In addition, the relationship between Di and Shu children was not necessarily as full of jealousy and fighting as in the novel. Therefore, there may be some differences between the Di Shu son in history and the Di Shu son described in the novel, but they are not exactly the same.
What is the difference between the animal novels written by Sidon and those written by Shen Shixi?
Sidon and Shen Shixi were both well-known animal novelists. Their animal novels had different styles and characteristics. Seaton's novels focused on the inner world and emotional expression of animals. His animal novels often explored the impact of human nature, society, and human behavior on animals. Seaton's animal novels were full of imagination and magical colors. Many animals had unique personalities and behaviors. His novels had complicated plots and vivid characters. The readers could deeply feel the emotional and psychological changes of animals. Shen Shixi's animal novels paid more attention to the physiological and behavior characteristics of animals. His novels focused on the living habits and behavior patterns of animals. Shen Shixi's animal novels used real animals as the background and presented the true appearance and inner world of animals through the description of their living habits. Shen Shixi's animal novels were relatively simple, but the text was smooth and easy to read and understand. The two readers can choose according to their preferences.
The difference between history and novels!
History and novels are both literary forms, but there are some obvious differences between them. History is a literary work that records and describes past events, people, culture, society, etc. Its purpose is to tell the truth of historical events, provide historical background and context, and provide readers with an understanding and understanding of historical events. Historical works usually used an objective and rigorous language and structure to present historical events and characters in order to achieve a true and credible effect. A novel is a fictional literary form that creates a fictional situation by describing characters, plots, and scenes to express the author's thoughts, emotions, and values. The fiction of a novel is the biggest difference between it and history. It can be used to create and imagine without being limited by the historical background and context. The language and structure of the novel were often more flexible and free to be closer to the needs and emotions of the readers. Therefore, history and novels have different writing purposes, language and structure, and readers should evaluate their value by different standards.
The difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons in ancient times
In ancient times, there was a clear difference between a legitimate son and a concubine's son. First of all, a Di son was a son born from the main wife, while a Shu son was a son born from a concubine or concubine. Di children enjoyed the highest status and authority in the family, and were regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of their father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. The status of the illegitimate son was lower, and he was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. They had no inheritance rights and could only get a small portion of their father's property after his death. Secondly, a legitimate son had an advantage in terms of inheritance. In ancient times, the eldest son inherited the throne, which meant that the throne and property must be inherited by the eldest son. If the eldest son was no longer around, his eldest son (i.e., the eldest grandson) would also have a higher succession order than the other sons. The sons of concubines did not have the opportunity to inherit their father's title, fief, official position, or property. As a result, legitimate sons enjoyed a higher status and power in ancient society.
Are those things written in the Ming Dynasty reliable? Is there a big discrepancy between them and the official history?
" Those Things in the Ming Dynasty " was a famous historical novel written by the Ming Dynasty novelist Stone Octopus. The book was set in the Ming Dynasty and described the political, military, economic, and cultural aspects of the late Ming Dynasty. The writing style of " Those Things in the Ming Dynasty " was lively and interesting, and the plot was full of ups and downs. It was deeply loved by the readers. However, it was not a rigorous historical novel and could not completely represent official history. Because the creation of a novel is fictional, it may be possible to adapt or exaggerate certain historical events, so there are certain differences with official history. Of course, as a literary work, the influence and literary value of " Those Things in the Ming Dynasty " could not be ignored. As a historical novel, its grasp of historical knowledge and detailed descriptions were very rigorous, demonstrating the author's understanding and analytical ability towards history. Therefore, whether it was reading " Those Things in the Ming Dynasty " or studying history, one needed to have a certain understanding and judgment of it.
Is there a big difference between the book Tokugawa Ieyasu and real history?
There were many differences between the book Tokugawa Ieyasu and real history. The specific differences were reflected in the following aspects: 1. The accuracy of historical records: The historical events and characters described in Tokugawa Ieyasu may have some deviation or missing because it is a literary work and not a historical document. In contrast, historical documents such as the History of Japan usually described historical events more accurately and objectively. 2. Dependability of character creation: The historical characters in Tokugawa Ieyasu may be fabricated and exaggerated. For example, the images and backgrounds of some historical figures might be modified or simplified to meet the needs of the novel's plot. 3. The rationality of the plot setting: The historical plot setting and character relationships in Tokugawa Ieyasu may not be consistent with historical facts. For example, some war scenes and character relationships may not be consistent with historical records. Although Tokugawa Ieyasu was an excellent literary work, it was still far from the real history. Therefore, readers should maintain a rational and objective attitude when reading this book. Don't trust the plot and character descriptions in the book.
What was the difference between history and novels?
History and novels were two different concepts. Although they might sometimes involve similar topics and plots, their essence was different. History is a method of recording historical events and people. It aims to provide detailed descriptions of past events and events so that people can better understand the past. History is usually divided into different periods and events and records many different perspectives and explanations. The purpose of history is to help people understand the past and provide reference for the future. A novel is a fictional literary form that aims to convey information and emotions through storytelling. A novel usually contains a plot, characters, and theme, and uses these elements to attract the reader's interest. The novel could be of any genre, including romance, science fiction, horror, history, biography, and so on. The purpose of a novel was to convey the author's thoughts and emotions through the story and to attract the reader's resonance. Although history and novels could both involve fictional plots and characters, their essence was different. History recorded what had actually happened, while novels were fictional stories. The purpose of history is to provide a detailed description of past events and provide reference for the future, while the purpose of novels is to convey the author's thoughts and emotions through telling stories and attract readers 'resonance.
The difference between history books and novels
History books and novels are both literary works, but there are many differences between them. History books were literary works that recorded historical events and people's events. They were usually presented in the form of words and usually described and analyzed historical events in detail. The purpose of history books was to record history, pass down culture, and provide a basis for future generations to study and analyze history. A novel was a literary work that presented itself in the form of fiction. It usually centered on the characters and presented the characters and theme through the narration of the story. The main purpose of a novel is to create artistic images to express the author's thoughts and emotions, as well as to satisfy the readers 'entertainment and aesthetic needs. There were also great differences in the form and content of historical books and novels. History books usually centered on historical events and characters, using narrative and description techniques to show the images and processes of historical events and characters. In novels, the characters were usually the center of the story, and the main theme was presented through fictional plots. The plot of a novel was often more flexible and flexible. History books and novels had different purposes and functions. History books recorded historical events and people's events to provide the basis for future generations to study and analyze history. The main purpose of the novel was to create artistic images to express the author's thoughts and emotions, as well as to satisfy the readers 'entertainment and aesthetic needs.
The difference between novels, history, and myths is that
The difference between novels, history, and myths was between fiction and reality. A novel is a fictional literary form that usually uses fictional plots, characters, and stories to convey the author's thoughts and emotions. The creation of novels was usually not limited by reality. It could reflect the author's values, beliefs, and worldview. History was a literary form that recorded and described human historical events. It was intended to convey the authenticity of historical events, the order of time, and the relationship between characters. History usually appeared in the form of words, paintings, sculptures, and other artistic forms and recorded historical events from ancient times to modern times. Mythology is also a form of fictional literature, usually through the description of mythical characters and events to convey the author's thoughts and emotions. The creation of myths was usually limited by human religious beliefs, cultural traditions, and imagination. It was intended to express the awe and worship of human beings towards nature, gods, ghosts, and other supernatural forces. Therefore, the main difference between novels, history, and myths was between fiction and reality. Fictions can reflect the author's thoughts and emotions, while history and myths record and describe human historical events and cultural traditions.
The difference between history and historical novels
History and historical novels were two different concepts. History refers to books, articles, movies, TV series, and other works that record and describe historical events, characters, culture, society, etc. The purpose of these works is to provide the true situation and background of historical events and to show the evolution process of historical events, the personality and influence of characters, etc. Historical novels used historical events as the background to create characters, plots, stories, etc. through fiction, imagination, or reasoning to present a fictional world related to historical events. Historical novels were different from historical books or historical documentaries. Historical novels could have the author's fictional elements or the author's imagination and reasoning. They often paid more attention to the design of characters, emotions, plots, and other elements to attract the interest and desire of readers or audiences. History, on the other hand, was more focused on reality and objective. It aimed to provide the true situation and background of historical events. History and historical novels are different in the way they record and present historical events, the purpose, and the content, but they are both records and expressions of historical events.
Why was there such a huge difference between the history written in books and the real world?
History written in books was very different from real history because history was a complicated process that involved many different factors and variables, including politics, economy, culture, society, and so on. History in books was usually written by historians based on their research and experience. Their perspectives and opinions were often limited by their own background and research, so there might be certain deviation and limitations. In addition, the accuracy and reliability of historical records were also very important issues. There are many records of events and people in history that can be controversial and have different views. These records can also be influenced by the different views and explanations of historians and the public. Therefore, the historical records in the books might be missing, wrong, or inaccurate. Although the history in books may have some deviation and limitations, it is still one of the important sources for us to understand history. Through reading history books, we can understand the causes, developments and results of historical events, better understand history and culture, and also improve our cultural quality and historical awareness.