Why do many people dislike first-person novels? What do you think?
First-person novels usually made the readers feel that the author's emotions and experiences were directly reflected on the paper, and the readers were more likely to resonate with them. However, this method would also make the novel less objective and rigorous, making the story more chaotic and vague. In addition, for some readers, the first person may make reading more difficult because they need to understand the author's emotions and experiences themselves. However, for some excellent novels, using the first person could still produce good results, such as "Dream of the Red Chamber","Romance of the Three Kingdoms", etc. These novels were excellent in expressing the emotions and plots of the characters and had very high literary value. The use of first-person novels has its unique advantages and disadvantages. Different readers may have different preferences and opinions. For the creation of novels, the author could try different ways to express the story and find the most suitable way of narration for his work.
Why do many people dislike first-person novels?
Many first-person novels lack empathy and immersion because the female or male protagonists in the novel usually can't really experience their emotions and experiences. This style of writing is often called "first-person tragedy" because it often reveals the loneliness, helplessness, and loss of the protagonist. In addition, first-person novels often limit the development of the story because the author can't imagine and design the plot like others. This limitation might cause problems in the logic and cohesiveness of the story, affecting the reader's understanding and experience of the story. Although first-person novels can sometimes grab readers 'attention, it's not always a popular way of writing. The readers prefer novels with depth, a compact plot, and logic to novels that simply describe their emotions and experiences.
Why do many people dislike reading novels written in the first person?
First-person writing usually makes the reader feel like the author is experiencing the plot and characters in the story. This sense of immersion can be frustrating and uncomfortable. This is because in first-person writing, readers tend to focus on the author rather than the characters and plot in the story. This sense of immersion might cause the reader to feel depressed and lonely, lacking empathy and understanding. First-person writing can also leave readers feeling that it lacks depth and cohesiveness. Because the author's own feelings and thoughts are often directly conveyed to the reader, it may cause the story to lack depth and logic. As a result, the reader might feel that the story is not compact and lacks tension, making it difficult to keep up with the development of the plot. First-person writing could also affect the story's legibility and appeal. As readers tend to focus on the author, they may miss other characters and plots in the story, which will affect the attractiveness and legibility of the story. Therefore, many readers prefer to write in the third person to better understand and immerse themselves in the characters and plot of the story, and at the same time, to better maintain the cohesiveness and depth of the story.
Why do so many people dislike reading first-person books?
First-person novels usually presented the perspective of the author or the protagonist, and the readers often couldn't really integrate into the story, so they would feel a lack of immersion. In addition, the first-person writing style may also make the story too autobiographical and lack fiction and imagination, thus reducing the attractiveness of the novel.
Why do so many people hate first-person novels?
First-person novels often leave readers feeling inadequate because the author cannot experience emotions and situations like the reader. This feeling is called the "author's perspective" or "God's perspective." In addition, first-person novels were often prone to problems such as insufficient character descriptions and dull plots, so readers 'feedback was often more negative. However, different readers have different preferences for first-person novels. Some people may like this kind of narrative because it allows the reader to participate in the story more directly.
Why do so many people hate first-person novels?
First-person writing often confuses and disposes the reader because it takes away the reader's understanding and sense of immersion in the story world. In first-person writing, the author usually described the story from his own point of view rather than from the reader's point of view. This way of writing would make the reader feel that the author had a deep understanding and experience of the plot, characters, and situation of the story, thus affecting the reader's perception and understanding of the story. In addition, because the author narrated from his own perspective, it was difficult for the readers to really participate in the story, and it was also difficult to establish a connection and resonance with the story world. In contrast, third-person writing allowed the readers to participate in the story more freely and better understand the plot and characters. At the same time, it was easier to establish a connection and resonance with the story world. In addition, third-person writing could also better highlight the narrative effect of the story and enhance the expressiveness of the novel. Although first-person writing has its own unique charm, in the creation of novels, it is necessary to choose according to the plot and the needs of the readers in order to better attract and retain the readers.
Why do people have a dislike for romance novels?
Some people might think they're too cheesy or predictable. Not everyone enjoys the typical love story tropes.
Why do many people think that Bill Gates is a bad person now?
Bill Gates was a famous philanthropist and entrepreneur. He founded the company and became one of the richest people in the world. However, some people think that Bill Gates is a bad person, mainly because he has made some controversial remarks and actions in the past. Some people think that Bill Gates is a bad guy for monopolizing the company. They believed that Gates had used his power and influence to make the company dominate the computer software market and monopolize most of the market share, which put a lot of pressure on competitors. This kind of behavior not only violated the anti-monopoly law but also harmed the interests of consumers. In addition, some people thought that Gates was also a bad person in terms of philanthropy. Although he founded the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is dedicated to helping global health, education, and poverty reduction, some people think that the operation of the foundation is not open and transparent, and there are problems with the operation of some projects. For example, some people questioned the effectiveness of the foundation in helping Africa deal with diseases such as malaria and how the funds were used. However, there were also people who thought Gates was a very smart person who had made many outstanding contributions in the field of business and technology. In addition, he was also a responsible leader. During his tenure as CEO of Microsoft.com, he had been committed to promoting technological innovation and philanthropy. Although Gates might have some controversial remarks and actions in some aspects, his contributions to the business and technology fields as well as his personal qualities were still worthy of respect.
Why do so many people hate first-person books?
First-person books usually describe the author's own feelings, thoughts, and experiences. It's easy for readers to feel a sense of immersion when reading. If the reader's character is the same as the author's, the reader will feel that the author's emotional fluctuations are similar to their own. This similarity may resonate with the reader, but it may also make the reader feel indifferent or unreal. In addition, first-person books tend to focus more on the plot and character development, ignoring other factors such as history, social background, etc., which may disappoint or satisfy some readers. Therefore, some readers might hate first-person books.
Why do many people think that web novels are useless?
The reason why many people felt that online novels were not nutritious was mainly because their storylines and characters were relatively easy to understand and lacked depth and content. In addition, the quality of many online novels was also uneven. Some of the content of the novels might be too fictional or exaggerated, and the lack of realistic basis made people feel that they lacked credibility. In addition, some web novels 'plots and characters might have negative images or plots that made people feel negative emotions, resulting in a decline in the evaluation of web novels. Although online novels have many readers, they do have some problems, including the lack of depth and content, uneven quality, etc. Therefore, when we read online novels, we should maintain rationality and not blindly follow the trend. We should choose the content according to our own interests and reading needs.
Why do many girls especially dislike male novels?
I'm sorry, but as a fan of online literature, I don't express my views or bias against specific gender groups. But I can explain why some women might be disgusted by male novels. Some women might think that male novels emphasize the ability and charm of the male protagonist too much and ignore the existence and development of the female protagonist. In such novels, the male protagonist could easily obtain abilities or resources that the female protagonist did not have, while the female protagonist often did not receive the respect and attention of the male protagonist. This might mislead female readers into thinking that female characters are less valuable than male characters. Some women might think that male novels focus too much on the plot and battle scenes and ignore the emotions and inner descriptions of the characters. This kind of novel may make female readers feel that it lacks depth and content, unable to feel the emotions and values conveyed by the novel. Of course, not all women had their own preferences and opinions. However, we hope that female readers can respect their reading preferences and choose a novel that truly suits their tastes instead of being limited by unrealistic prejudices.