Why do many people dislike first-person novels?
Many first-person novels lack empathy and immersion because the female or male protagonists in the novel usually can't really experience their emotions and experiences. This style of writing is often called "first-person tragedy" because it often reveals the loneliness, helplessness, and loss of the protagonist. In addition, first-person novels often limit the development of the story because the author can't imagine and design the plot like others. This limitation might cause problems in the logic and cohesiveness of the story, affecting the reader's understanding and experience of the story. Although first-person novels can sometimes grab readers 'attention, it's not always a popular way of writing. The readers prefer novels with depth, a compact plot, and logic to novels that simply describe their emotions and experiences.
Why do many people dislike reading novels written in the first person?
First-person writing usually makes the reader feel like the author is experiencing the plot and characters in the story. This sense of immersion can be frustrating and uncomfortable. This is because in first-person writing, readers tend to focus on the author rather than the characters and plot in the story. This sense of immersion might cause the reader to feel depressed and lonely, lacking empathy and understanding. First-person writing can also leave readers feeling that it lacks depth and cohesiveness. Because the author's own feelings and thoughts are often directly conveyed to the reader, it may cause the story to lack depth and logic. As a result, the reader might feel that the story is not compact and lacks tension, making it difficult to keep up with the development of the plot. First-person writing could also affect the story's legibility and appeal. As readers tend to focus on the author, they may miss other characters and plots in the story, which will affect the attractiveness and legibility of the story. Therefore, many readers prefer to write in the third person to better understand and immerse themselves in the characters and plot of the story, and at the same time, to better maintain the cohesiveness and depth of the story.
Why do many people dislike first-person novels? What do you think?
First-person novels usually made the readers feel that the author's emotions and experiences were directly reflected on the paper, and the readers were more likely to resonate with them. However, this method would also make the novel less objective and rigorous, making the story more chaotic and vague. In addition, for some readers, the first person may make reading more difficult because they need to understand the author's emotions and experiences themselves. However, for some excellent novels, using the first person could still produce good results, such as "Dream of the Red Chamber","Romance of the Three Kingdoms", etc. These novels were excellent in expressing the emotions and plots of the characters and had very high literary value. The use of first-person novels has its unique advantages and disadvantages. Different readers may have different preferences and opinions. For the creation of novels, the author could try different ways to express the story and find the most suitable way of narration for his work.
Why do so many people dislike reading first-person books?
First-person novels usually presented the perspective of the author or the protagonist, and the readers often couldn't really integrate into the story, so they would feel a lack of immersion. In addition, the first-person writing style may also make the story too autobiographical and lack fiction and imagination, thus reducing the attractiveness of the novel.
Why do so many people hate first-person novels?
First-person novels often leave readers feeling inadequate because the author cannot experience emotions and situations like the reader. This feeling is called the "author's perspective" or "God's perspective." In addition, first-person novels were often prone to problems such as insufficient character descriptions and dull plots, so readers 'feedback was often more negative. However, different readers have different preferences for first-person novels. Some people may like this kind of narrative because it allows the reader to participate in the story more directly.
Why do so many people hate first-person novels?
First-person writing often confuses and disposes the reader because it takes away the reader's understanding and sense of immersion in the story world. In first-person writing, the author usually described the story from his own point of view rather than from the reader's point of view. This way of writing would make the reader feel that the author had a deep understanding and experience of the plot, characters, and situation of the story, thus affecting the reader's perception and understanding of the story. In addition, because the author narrated from his own perspective, it was difficult for the readers to really participate in the story, and it was also difficult to establish a connection and resonance with the story world. In contrast, third-person writing allowed the readers to participate in the story more freely and better understand the plot and characters. At the same time, it was easier to establish a connection and resonance with the story world. In addition, third-person writing could also better highlight the narrative effect of the story and enhance the expressiveness of the novel. Although first-person writing has its own unique charm, in the creation of novels, it is necessary to choose according to the plot and the needs of the readers in order to better attract and retain the readers.
Why do so many people hate first-person books?
First-person books usually describe the author's own feelings, thoughts, and experiences. It's easy for readers to feel a sense of immersion when reading. If the reader's character is the same as the author's, the reader will feel that the author's emotional fluctuations are similar to their own. This similarity may resonate with the reader, but it may also make the reader feel indifferent or unreal. In addition, first-person books tend to focus more on the plot and character development, ignoring other factors such as history, social background, etc., which may disappoint or satisfy some readers. Therefore, some readers might hate first-person books.
Why do people have a dislike for romance novels?
Some people might think they're too cheesy or predictable. Not everyone enjoys the typical love story tropes.
Why do many girls especially dislike male novels?
I'm sorry, but as a fan of online literature, I don't express my views or bias against specific gender groups. But I can explain why some women might be disgusted by male novels. Some women might think that male novels emphasize the ability and charm of the male protagonist too much and ignore the existence and development of the female protagonist. In such novels, the male protagonist could easily obtain abilities or resources that the female protagonist did not have, while the female protagonist often did not receive the respect and attention of the male protagonist. This might mislead female readers into thinking that female characters are less valuable than male characters. Some women might think that male novels focus too much on the plot and battle scenes and ignore the emotions and inner descriptions of the characters. This kind of novel may make female readers feel that it lacks depth and content, unable to feel the emotions and values conveyed by the novel. Of course, not all women had their own preferences and opinions. However, we hope that female readers can respect their reading preferences and choose a novel that truly suits their tastes instead of being limited by unrealistic prejudices.
Why did many people dislike the adapted Journey to the West?
Perhaps it was because the adapted Journey to the West had many shortcomings compared to the original. 1. Cutting and adjusting important plots and characters in the original work, causing the story to be incomplete or lose its depth. 2. Adding a lot of content that does not conform to the values of the original work, such as violence, gore, eroticism, etc. These elements may affect the reader's understanding and appreciation of the original work. The quality of the adapted movie or TV series is uneven. Some scenes may not be shot well enough or the actors 'performances may not match the original image. 4. The adapted work may lose some of the unique characteristics and charm of the original work, such as the unique language and characters in the original work. These shortcomings may cause some people to be critical of the adapted Journey to the West, and the loyal fans of the original work may also feel dissatisfied and disappointed. However, both the original and the adapted works have their own unique charm and value. The readers can decide whether to watch or appreciate them according to their own preferences and needs.
Why did many people dislike the popular online terms?
Internet catchphrases are a part of the internet culture and are often used in social media, online forums, chat rooms, and other online environments. However, because these terms are usually used in an unofficial setting, they can sometimes be misunderstood as formal idioms, slangs, or aphorisms. In addition, some people think that popular online terms lack cultural meaning and can't express real thoughts and feelings, so they dislike using these terms. There were also some people who thought that the popular online language was too vulgar and vulgar, which did not meet the requirements of society's elegant culture. Therefore, some people were disgusted with the popular online terms and hoped to maintain the elegance and civilization of the online culture.