Please translate this article about O 'Henry's works, thanks! Urgent, urgent, urgent

The era that O. Henry lived and wrote in was the period when American capitalists developed rapidly and embarked on the imperialist stage. The domestic capitalists were highly concentrated, and the lives of the lower class people were becoming increasingly poor. Faced with such a reality, the American language had gradually transformed from the early romanticism to the harsh realism. As a realistic and humanist writer born in such a typical historical environment, O. Henry was rooted in life and faced reality. However, the social reality of mass culture gradually moving towards low-level interests and sensationalization also made writers realize that what the editors and magazine owners needed were novel stories, humorous jokes, and even vulgar social scandals that were aimed at mass culture. It was a cultural fast food that surprised people and gave people a happy ending. For the sake of artistic survival and the pursuit of art, this forced the author to put more effort into the technique of novel creation, to change the direction against his will, and to use techniques to adapt. The result of this change and adaptation was the birth of a brand new O. Henry style of creation. 1. Melting sorrow and joy As a critical realist writer, O. Henry's short stories were mainly about criticism. Even if it was to describe the suffering lives of small people, or to show their human virtues in suffering, or to expose their deep-rooted bad habits, it was also to expose and criticize the dark reality of capitalist society. The reality of society required him to use his pen to find ways to cater to the requirements of the editors and editors and to pass the review system. Max once pointed out: "Now a group of outstanding British novelists, in their excellent and vivid books, reveal more political and social truths to the world than all professional politicians, politicians, and moralists combined."(5) As an American critical realist writer, O. Henry's wisdom, courage, and artistic achievements in this area were comparable to these writers. O. Henry was good at creating the structure of the novel. He could make the seemingly plain and thin story change the content of the story by enlarging the plot and expanding the world of the characters 'activities. It would make the readers have a kind of aesthetic surprise, and the unpredictable artistic beauty would instantly enter the readers' hearts. It was the combination of comedy and tragedy to achieve the unity of form. The writer's skill was a kind of hidden criticism. The characters in his works often made comedic self-sacrifices, wanting to do good things but things did not go as they wished, resulting in tragedies. However, it often humorously shows that the protagonist unexpectedly shows humanity in the tragic encounter, so it has a comedy color. Peale in "Two Gentlemen of Thanking Day" and Sobey in "The Police and the Hymn" were both young men who were part of the millions of unemployed people in America. They were both struggling to survive in hunger and cold. This was their common tragedy, and also the tragedy of society. However, their tragedies were expressed in relatively independent comedy forms: one highlighted hunger, the other highlighted cold, but in the end, one died, the other went to prison, and the novel returned to the tragic ending. Writers were not only good at using comedies to show the warmth and coldness of human feelings, but also good at using tragedies to reveal inhuman devastation. They were not only good at deepening the tragic influence from comedies, but also good at permeating comedy into tragedies. Using the form of comedy to express the tragic content, using the tragic plot to contrast the effect of comedy, making the combination of comedy and tragedy form the dialect of O. Henry's creation art. It had the function of aesthetic refutation, receiving the effect of spicy irony and hidden criticism. This was the wonderful use of the writer's skill.