I am having an existential crisis all the time.
閱讀
5732
閱讀作品
With what? he can teleport and even if they locked the Space around him he could still Fly more than 100 times the speed of sound.
While balance sounds ideal, history teaches us that it’s often more complicated. For instance, the initial push for women’s equality eventually gave way to some advocating for supremacy. Similarly, the LGBTQ+ community’s desire for a peaceful existence has evolved into a push to expose children to these ideals. It’s a reminder that when we give a little, the desire for more often follows. The same can be said for freedom—allowing a small amount can eventually lead to demands for more, pushing society toward individualism. In the end, it’s hard to maintain the balance we envision, and we’re left with a choice: embrace a more individualistic society that may serve the present but harm the future, or lean toward collectivism, which may protect the future but at the cost of present freedoms.
You bring up a valid point—no region is without internal divisions. However, unity is not about the absence of disagreements but about the ability to move forward despite them. In this regard, the East still holds a stronger sense of national identity and purpose compared to the West, where ideological fractures have turned into deep wounds. A nation’s greatest enemy is rarely external; it is the rot from within that determines its downfall. As for the rise and fall of powers, history does repeat itself, but the manner of decline varies. The U.S. is not merely fading due to external competition but is unraveling from within—its people divided, its institutions corrupted, and its purpose lost to greed. Meanwhile, China and much of Asia are still in their ascendant phase. The shift of power to Asia and Africa is not a question of if but when. Yet, true strength is not just about economic or military might—it is about sustaining stability through transition. The West is failing in this regard. Whether the coming shift will be gradual or violent depends on whether those in power recognize the tides of history or vainly try to resist them.
Exactly. And the reason they get away with it is because people are too divided and too afraid to resist. That’s the issue with individualism—it conditions people to prioritize themselves over the greater good. When self-preservation takes precedence, no one is willing to stand up, and that’s exactly how they want it. A fragmented, selfish society is easy to control. Add in distractions like alcohol, gambling, and meaningless entertainment, and people become too numb to fight back while the elites drain them dry.
He never truly resurrected; the virus simply took over his entire identity and became him. Later on, the virus discovers this, which also canonically proves the existence of the soul.
Maybe, but in a real war, no one can say with absolute certainty who would win—especially if no outside forces intervene—since both sides are closely matched. However, in the grand scheme of things, the outcome hardly matters. The U.S. is in decline; even its own citizens are disillusioned. A worsening mental health crisis, deep ideological and racial divisions, and a ruling class driven by profit over loyalty all signal a nation losing its foundation. And in the end, those who hold true power will always side with whoever offers the greatest advantage. On second thought, if history has taught us anything, my bet would be that China will win, though not by a large margin. However, if allies are involved, I believe the East would almost certainly win. Unlike the West, where division runs deep and citizens are increasingly disconnected—distrusting or even resenting each other for arbitrary reasons—the East maintains a stronger sense of unity, national identity, and collective purpose.
The U.S. is no longer the number one country—China overtook it some time ago, not just in terms of money and power but also due to the nationalism of its citizens. They are willing to die for their nation, while the new generation in the U.S. is preoccupied with defining what a woman is.
i don't know why but i thought of the commander.