Shin_Senpai

If you wanted Ben to be immature, you should have just kept him as a kid. That would have perfectly fitted this characterization + him being a immature teen was an important part of his character later helped him develop. The only reason you'd already want him to be 18 is because you wanted a mature Ben(which potentially would Azmuth find him worthy, and grant him full access, like how Azmuth promised in Omniverse that he'd do the same when Ben turned 18)

Would have preferred Ben to be a teenager, as being an immature superhero was a important part of his character. Well... this appears to be some transmigrated character or something, so let' see. Expectations are set to low.

You're really letting ChatGPT write everything for you. The quality has dropped so much. You shouldn't write if you have to depend on AI this much. Literally a disgrace.

Since people like to self-insert themselves in stories, they want to stories with narratives that match what they would have done. In this case this guy would have never ever helped anyone leading to a violent outburst. Probably lives in his mothers basement as well.

I doubt this person would help others even if he was being paid. Probably run away with the money.

Take a break from the internet. Go read some actual books, go outside, maybe even take up some volunteering work. Because, I can see that your brain is now a rotting mess. It is imperative that you fix it as soon as possible.

This isn't tragic, not even corny. It's just dumb. The prose is awful, it's extremely hard to follow what's going on. This just seems like a drunken mess. The author just wanted to be like "See how awful of a life the MC has". Do better.

Ahh... Rh Null blood isn't really a barrier for organ transplants, ABO is more important than that. Rh Null plays an important role in Blood Transfusions tho.

It's not inevitable. And it's common sense to not reply to comments years old. That's why necroing is a thing. And, you changed my example. Did I say "B asks A to watch movie again" or "B replies to a question/statement that A made 4 years ago" Spoiler Alert: I said the latter. Both are vastly different things. Please read properly before replying. Like, it's a very simple thing to understand, this is a comment that someone made years ago, extremely likely that they'll not remember shit about it, so replying under such a post is meaningless. Many forums practice the act of locking/archiving forum posts when they're dead to avoid this problem(with another reason being to save on computational costs.).

Who the frigg uses letters nowadays(there are some exceptions like legal stuff). Everyone uses Real time chatting service, Emails etc. which work pretty much instantly. So, you can't be thinking that this is like letters aka this is not a good comparison. A more apt comparison is a physical conversation between two people on some non-important topic, and then another person replying 4 years later. Example: Person A: "Hey, I think part in the movie was stupid" *4 years later* Person B: "Hey I disagree with that statement. I don't think that part was stupid.", Person A: "What are you talking about. What part?", Person B: "You know the movie we watched", Person A: "Which movie?", Person B: "[Insert Movie] we watched 4 years ago", Person A: "I don't remember shit, why are you telling this to me now."