And so is this. It's the only word I know where evil is good.

*shrug* It is also true.

This is basic biology class type info, mate.

The story was pretty good. But the Cringe factor became to much. 😥

It was good, until this point.

Why have the MC doing something stupid like shouting something like System? Why shout? It's rather pointless and not even funny, unless it's the Shouting System. On top of that, it gives him his stats page afterwards? It isn't even the correct command. So if you shout a person's name, everyone SITS DOWN instead?

Okay. The MC just went completely against his personality, character traits, and personal history. It's like watching Batman becoming best friends with the guy that murdered his parents. It just isn't going to happen. I mean seriously?! No. Nope.

The point was already made. It was pretty blunt. Intelligence and Technology are two different things. Humans, in general, have lower intelligence than Orca, Porpoises, etc. This is a documentable fact, not an opinion. If something happens that destroys all current tech, then average humans will show their true level of intelligence, which is not very high on the scale of entities on Earth. Again, not an opinion. Having the Tech of record keeping is the only thing that allows humans to seemingly stand above other creatures, as it allows the development of ideas. This is NOT intelligence. Confusing intelligence with tech is the basis of the common misconception that humans are the smartest, ie: most intelligent creatures on the planet, when they are not...

I repeat: A human individual may be smart, but as a group, humans are idiots. This is called mob mentality, and society as a whole is a mob. On the other hand, an individual requires education of a specific kind in order to do many of the things you mentioned. Without it, their mental development will be on the same level as a young child. Nukes, guns, etc can not be made by an uneducated child. That requires accumulated knowledge that can be actually applied (Technology). Remove the tech and the average intelligence level of people will be LOWER than that of a Spider Monkey. Why? Because the 'tech' level of the monkeys would be higher. They would simply know what they could eat to survive, while the humans would not. As said, this is all heavily documented info. Use verifiable sources, not the internet in general. Use common sense - and a little " intelligence ".

You seem to be ignoring the main point while focusing on a mistake in your understanding. For Humans, it is not intelligence that is their strongest aspect, but Technology (accumulated and applicable knowledge). Remove the tech and the true level of humans becomes obvious. Language is also considered a form of Technology, btw. Intelligence involves what one knows, what they don't know, and intuitive innovation. As for the rest, instead of ranting, you could use your "intelligence" and actually look it up. There are entire PhD courses about this. Enlighten yourself. Nothing stated here can not be supported by volumes of documentation. So simply Google it. You have fingers. Use them. Yes? Yes.

Righteous does NOT mean good. A R@pest can be righteous and work for the church, ie: Templars during the Crusade were righteous as they raped, murdered and pillaged. Does this make them "Good"?

You just described a military sergeant, and not a father. Though those things are necessary - to an extent. But a good father also must be there for the family, not only physically but mentally as well. Just providing for them does not count, as it is how they are or are not treated that molds a child. Keep in mind that this is generalized, but it is one of the major factors that will cause a father to loose custody of their kids in the case of divorce.

I forget the term, but it is the same thing as developing an accent. Those with similar sound modulate their voices without realizing it. Basically mimicking each other. Separate them for a few months and they won't sound alike afterwards.

Well I said 200 years, but it's really from around 1940 to now.

Read further. Turns out he actually doesn't. He copies them, which is not at all what the author originally said. This gets indirectly mentioned in the locked chapters, but not before then.

Actually, it was only recently (within the past 200 years) that MoonBlood wasn't used as the main factor for deciding when a girl was of marriage age. For aristocracy, the ages were older, true, but the commoners didn't go by that measure. There is a term that sums up much of this, and that is "Old Maid". An Old Maid was an unmarried girl that has reached age 15, and because they were 'too old', they were often considered unmarriageable or undesirable.

True, but you're using modern standards for Medieval Times. The age of marriage for girls was generally shortly after first MoonBlood (often between 8 - 10, though it could be much, much younger at times due to certain medical conditions); whereas for men, it was when they could support a wife and family, they would literally buy a wife like a slave (he'd be on the high age for a man of that period, so between 25 - 50+ historically, though typically most didn't live past 40, some did). You're also forgetting how they tried to produce as many kids as possible due to high child mortality rates - often forcing early births after only 7 or 8 months, and getting her pregnant as soon as possible after that. So say 8 months with maybe 4 weeks until she's pregnant again. If like the Russian World record holder, she had multiples every time, there would be a lot of children. And if they all survived? Well... It was only recently that many world governments have passed certain laws to prevent large families. Unlike China's discontinued one child program (a program designed specifically to target and eliminate female children on a massive scale - I am leaving a huge amount of info out about that one as many were purged), the US took a different route by regulating specific industries via taxes. This raised the overall cost of raising a child, making nearly prohibitively expensive to do so. For example, my Grandmother had 11 kids and that was the smallest group in her family at the time. However, none of those children could afford more than 3 - 4 kids of their own. That is 11 families that couldn't afford to have more - not didn't want them, but couldn't feed them, because of the government changes made in order to eliminate large families in the US.