baembeldesbla

The Writing is full of inconsistencies. Just as Example: At one Point Dumbledore has already fought Voldemort in the Ministries... but at the same tine Lucius Malfoy thinks Voldemort is still dead and after that: The Triwizard Tournament begins to happen. The timeline just does not add up. The Portrayal of Merlin from the Seven Deadly Sins seems unnecessary harsh and abrupt in her behavior. In essence the reader will probably not care about Merlin as a Character, why should they? She willingly belittles everything and is more powerful and knows more than all others. It feels like there is no fun in this story. There is no real message in the story except everything and everyone else is stupid. Read up till Chapter 21 and will not continue.

Confirmation... Dumbledore could not have fought Voldy in the Ministry as stated in Chapter 2... Voldy is not even in a physical form yet.

Didn't they JUST establish that ALL Hogwarts Defenses were gone?

I would rather point out the Mistake the AI made in the text. Dumbledore only fights Voldemort AFTER Voldemorts Ressurection... yet Lucius thought his Master was dead... It's a contradiction and an easy mistake an AI would make. Because -> Triwizard Tournament -> Voldy returns -> Lucius and the others know he's back and gather there -> Fight at the Ministry a year later... so Lucius Malfoy cannot believe his Master is dead as established just last chapter... It's a contradiction...

Well... My Assassin Ninja always prepares Stinky-Traps made from "Pure filtered disgusting Bog of Eternal Stench Essence" added with a few select Skunk additions and other nasty surprises... 30% more effect? Why, Thank you! The Stinky Assassin aims to please... *slightly-innocent-but-in-essence-devilish-grin*

The damn Eye WAS NOT the welcome gift? suuuuuuuuuuuuuure....

Flag?

She is in an eleven or twelve year old body… Seriously….

Okay, I get where you are coming from. But literary categories are not the same thing as metaphysical moral categories. Mostly because "Anti-Hero" in literature usually means: "A Protagonists lacking traditional heroic traits" and not: "A morally neutral being outside good and evil..." Again, I get your point of view, but instead of you answering my "The world is not black and white", you simply lay out: "Actually, objective moral order exists..." Even if that objective morality existed, it still does and would not automatically eliminate conflicted motives, tragic choices, morally compromised people, partial virtue, corruption and so much more. So, I am done trying to have a philosophical discussion about "does objective moral truth exist". You are absolutely in the right, to believe whatever you want to believe. I respect that. That does not mean I have to share your point of view completely. Therefore, thank you.

The Problem with "there are only Heroes and Villains", well it flattens the worldview into black and white. No complexity, nothing. And even if it is a mixed Category, the world is not black and white, hero or villain. I understand your view, but I do not share it. Thanks for commenting.