the discourses

Another trash novel full of hypocrite political discourses. Don't these would be authors realize that they can promote their country without having to constantly compare it artificially to others?

It's an amazing piece of work in terms of literary skills. I feel it would be more at home in a book award lineup than at WebNovel. I loved the interplay of the author and his(her?) imaginary world that has developed a life of its own, but it's sometimes a bit too heavy to read at 2am in the morning or during a lunch break 😆 Purely from a WebNovel consumer viewpoint. Some typos slipped through here and there, but writing is of impeccable quality. Would highly recommend if you love philosophical discourses in your daily reading diet.

The story presents a bold and deeply provocative premise: a protagonist reincarnated as a demon who, against all expectations of his nature, exercises genuine faith in God. Not as an easy redemption strategy or a shallow metaphor, but as the faith taught by, Jesus fighting against one’s own profane nature in order to promote inner transformation. As Christ himself states: “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.” (Matthew 16:24) The work’s greatest merit lies in its refusal to offer simple answers. The protagonist is neither sanctified nor absolved. He believes, and this faith does not free him from the weight of who he is. On the contrary, faith becomes his greatest strength, enabling him to preserve his own humanity. The narrative directly engages with the biblical idea of continuous, rather than instantaneous, transformation: “Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” (Romans 12:2) Throughout the narrative, the tension between the protagonist’s belief and identity is consistently developed: he believes in God, respects His order, and recognizes His justice, even while in conflict with his own condition. This struggle echoes the words of the apostle Paul: “For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing.” (Romans 7:19) Much of the negative reception does not criticize the literary quality of the work, but rather the very existence of the idea of religious faith. Some readers react with automatic revulsion, stating that: “The Christian faith is, by nature, homophobic.” Such a statement ignores the central principle of the Gospel, expressed unequivocally: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22:39) and reinforced by: “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.” (1 John 4:8) Others claim: “I hate the fact that this excellent writing quality is used to create a religiously fanatical character.” However, the faith presented in the work is not fanaticism, but moral conscience and inner struggle, something that Jesus explicitly distinguishes from religious hypocrisy: “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.” (Matthew 15:8) These criticisms reveal less about the book and more about the limitations of the reader, especially when personal faith is confused with institutions, historical abuses, or forms of hate speech that Christ himself condemned. It is striking to see discourses that claim to defend love and inclusion resort to hatred, cancellation, and the dehumanization of those who think differently positions diametrically opposed to biblical principles. The work does not attempt to defend institutions, dogmas, or historical religious discourses. It speaks of faith not of religion as a structure of power but as a teaching of self-development, repentance, and inner growth, exactly as summarized by Jesus: “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32) And many readers seem unable to separate one from the other. 😅