The characteristics of Chekhov's novelsThe characteristics of Chekhov's novels were:
1. Realism: Chekhov's works usually describe real life, focusing on the living conditions of the people at the bottom of society, as well as the lives of the aristocrats and the capitalists.
2. Vivid characters: Chekhov's characters are very detailed in their personality, psychology, behavior, etc. The performance is very real, allowing readers to deeply feel the inner world of each character.
3. Strong dramatic tension: Chekhov's works often have dramatic plots, compact conflicts, and strong readers are easily attracted by the plot and have a strong desire to read.
4. Tough structure: Chekhov's works are often very rigorous in structure. The plot and character development have a certain degree of logic and rationality. The reader can deeply understand the meaning and meaning of the story in the reading process.
5. Literature style: Chekhov's unique literary style, concise and clear language, vivid and delicate description, often using metaphor, symbolism and other rhetorical devices to create a unique literary atmosphere.
What are the best of Chekhov's novels?" Chekhov's Short Stories Collection " was a collection of Chekhov's novels, which included 58 classic works of Chekhov, such as " Chameleon,"" The Man in a Sleeve,"" Nightingale's concert,"" Wanka,"" House with Attic,"" Gooseberry," Death of a Petty Official,"" Grief,"" Longing for Sleep," and " Sergeant Prisibeev." These works either mocked the ugliness of officialdom or ridiculed the awkwardness of life. They were both humorous and witty, showing Chekhov's deep understanding of human nature and his love for ordinary people.
<a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Reading Chekhov's satirical novelsChekhov's satirical novels have a unique artistic charm.
When reading Chekhov's satirical novels, one could start from the following aspects:
** 1. Understand the use of sarcasm **
1. ** Manga Method **
- Chekhov often used simple portraits to achieve satirical effects. For example, in the description of Belikov's appearance in The Man in a Sleeve, he wore rain boots, an umbrella, a warm coat on a sunny day, put a watch and a pencil knife in the sleeve, wore sunglasses, wore a wool sweater, and covered his ears with cotton. These descriptions outlined a strange image. He seemed to want to put himself in a variety of material and spiritual "covers" and avoid all new things. This seemingly casual description actually implied the author's sharp irony of his conservative ideas.
2. ** Exaggeration **
- It was reflected in many places in The Man in a Condom. First of all, there was a high-frequency "replay" of Belikov's absurd statement,"Don't make any trouble." Whether it was a drama club, a reading room, or a teahouse in the city, he was worried that there would be trouble. The second was to exaggerate his abnormal mentality. At night, the slightest noise in the kitchen would make him tremble in fear that the thief would sneak into the bedroom and have nightmares all night. Moreover, he magnified his influence on society. He made the people of the city live in fear for ten to fifteen years. People did not dare to speak loudly, write letters, make friends, read books, help the poor, teach people to read and write, and so on. Through these exaggerated descriptions, he created a hateful and pitiful image of Belikov. His old-fashioned consciousness affected the lives of the people and made him panic all day long.
3. ** Comparisons **
- For example, in The Man in a Sleeve, it was normal for the Kovalenko siblings to ride bicycles, but Belikov was confused. He even said,"If a teacher rode a bicycle, what good could he expect his students to do? All they can do is turn around and walk with their heads!" It was ironic to compare his absurd thoughts with his serious posture and language.
- ** The contradictory contrast between the character's words and deeds **: When Belikov's marriage was "almost" successful, a cartoon made him panic, and then he went to Kovalenko to confess that he had "nothing to do with this (love)" and claimed that his "actions have always been worthy of being a gentleman in all aspects". The contradiction between his words and actions fully showed how ridiculous and hateful he was.
- ** Comparing the personalities of different characters **: In The Man in a Condom, the lively, passionate, and beautiful Huarenka formed a sharp contrast with the conservative, timid, and eccentric Belikov. Belikov actually "fell in love" with her, which was a great irony to Belikov and also doomed the tragedy of this "love".
4. ** Inverse grammar **
- When a person's feelings reached the peak, they would often be expressed in the opposite way. In terms of language, it was "irony", which was also a possible technique used in Chekhov's satirical novels.
** 2. Experience the theme of the work **
1. social criticism
- Many of Chekhov's satirical novels revealed the various ills of Russian society at that time. For example,"Chameleon" satirized the image of the small bureaucrats who fawned on the powerful and swayed with the wind under the tsar's autocratic system by describing the many changes in the attitude of the police officer Ochumilov in dealing with the dog-biting incident. It reflected the darkness of society and the decay of officialdom at that time.
2. The Revealing of Human Weakness
- For example,"The Death of an Official", by describing the story of a small official, Cherviakov, who kept apologizing for disturbing the general with a sneeze, and finally died of fear, it revealed the human weaknesses of the small people under the bureaucracy.
** 3. Focus on character creation **
1. the portrayals of typical characters
- The characters in Chekhov's works were often typical images. For example, Belikov was a typical representative of conservative, rigid, and afraid of change. His image was not only an individual, but also a symbol of the conservative forces in Russian society that hindered social progress.
2. The psychological description of the characters
- He was good at describing the psychological activities of characters to show their personalities. It described the psychological changes of the characters when they faced various situations, so that the readers could understand the motives of the characters in depth, and thus better understand the irony of the work.
** 4. Combining Chekhov's life and background **
1. Chekhov's Life Experience
- He graduated from the Moscow Medical University, and his medical experience allowed him to have extensive contact with civilians and understand life, which provided rich material for his creation. Many of his works reflected the hardships of civilian life and the injustice suffered by the people at the bottom of society.
2. era background
- Chekhov lived in the period of social transformation in Russia. Under the rule of the Tsar, Russia had problems such as the decadence of the feudal system and the division of social classes. His satirical novel was a reflection of the social reality of that era. By satirizing those unreasonable phenomena, it reflected the necessity of social change.
<a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The main characters in Chekhov's novelsThe characters in Chekhov's novels had various personalities. The following were some common types:
** 1. People at the bottom of society **
1. ** Cowardly and helpless **
- Like the old station master Baelin in Pushkin's "Station Master", after his daughter was taken away, he wanted to find her but was unable to do so. In the end, he could only drown his sorrows in alcohol and die of depression. He was helpless in the face of the changes in his life. He did not have the ability to change the situation. His fate was completely controlled by external factors.
2. ** Small, ordinary and easily overlooked **
- Bashmachkin in Gogol's "Coat" was a ninth-grade official responsible for recording documents. He was poor, mediocre, and unremarkable in society. There were even people who kept throwing trash at him on the streets. He could only helplessly accept being humiliated. His existence was insignificant to the people around him.
** 2. People like Belikov in The Man in the Sleeve **
1. ** Cowardly, conservative and stubborn **
- He always wore a coat to cover his whole body. Even on the sunniest day, he wore rain boots, carried an umbrella, and always wore a warm cotton coat. He was afraid of change, conservative in his thinking, and full of fear whenever something new appeared. For example, he was extremely afraid of social change and tried his best to maintain the current order. No matter what the government said, he would blindly believe it.
2. ** Lonely and suspicious **
- He put everything he had with him in one "cover" after another, hid his face "in the upturned collar", wore black glasses, a woolen sweater, stuffed his ears with cotton, and always asked the coachman to put up the hood of the carriage. As soon as he got into bed, he pulled the blanket over his head. He was still trembling under the blanket, afraid that something would happen. He was full of doubts about everything around him, thinking that danger would happen.
** 3. Ordinary secular figures (such as the characters in The Woman with the Puppy)**
1. ** Suppressing true feelings **
- The two people who had an extramarital affair because of loneliness and boredom during their vacation at the sanatorium did not dare to face their feelings because they did not want to destroy their inherent way of life. They could only live their real and most meaningful life under the cover of secrets. The true feelings in their hearts were suppressed.
<a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Decent novel, but the protagonist becomes OP too quickly and the protagonist is very generic and it has multiple cliches in it as well. I do wish to see more, but I hope the author doesn't use padding later on. I really wish people would use the Chekhov's Gun concept more, it would massively improve the quality of many fics.