Ha ha ha lol

...lol... this is review area for the novel, not yourself.

In the absence of clear evaluation criteria, the only option is to use personal opinions as a reference. You can complain that he was not clear about the reasons but the assessment is valid.

He didn't evaluate the book, or even the tag. Just stated the effect of the tag on him. But whatever rocks your boat, Davros92.

It is a comment system that allows animated gifs, texts and stickers. If the site really wanted to develop it would establish rules and exclude the useless ones. There isn't even a decent antispam. My previous text was more of a critique of the qidian's ambiguous stance. The quality of my previous text was lower because English is not my native language and I was using my cell phone instead of a computer.

Davros92, has anyone told you that you talk a lot of pointless fluff? You should be a politician, answering anything with unrelated spam. You replied MY comment with a direct contradiction. Then when I point out that you're wrong, you change topic entirely. I'm using the phone app as well. Go message or email Webnovel if you have critiques or suggestions. Don't harass readers in the comments and use stupid reasons as excuses. On a side note; If your excuse is that English is your second language, go post a review in your 1st language and be a beacon for those who speak it.

My native language is Portuguese, local cellphones alternate google translate in English/Portuguese shifting the text and sometimes part of the text disappears. It's a glitch of google not qidian, local tech issues. Try CNN Spanish on your Android and you will understand. Basically my text was trying to state that neither "you" nor the original commenter are wrong, but that the site failed to establish clear parameters separating criticism and personal comments. I'm not a politician, but I look for the best term in respect of third parties, overestimating patience in understanding my message. :)