webnovel
avatar

Review Detail of PerryThePlatypus in One Piece - Supreme King

Review detail

PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv42yrPerryThePlatypus

I will never understand how people can posts such clickbait and get away with it. When I first saw this I thought we were getting type moon character in one piece considering they have the same name and the author used the fate picture

altalt

One Piece - Supreme King

noname_marco

Liked by 4 people

LIKE

Replies13

daydreamer_no1
daydreamer_no1Lv14daydreamer_no1

and that is how your do it 😂😂 pure facts now I will definitely read this if the author can defend him/herself so good 😂😂 was not expecting to see this when I went into the reviews 👏👏👏

noname_marco:Ok in this case, you are right about me being able to use any cover image, I could use absolutely any cover image I fancied (as long as it is within WN's guidelines ofc) but you're wrong when you say it is completely misguided. It's really not, and I get the feeling you either did not fully read my previous reply, or you have not read the story at all. This is due to the fact as I previously mentioned twice that the MC's design was based on this character. The MC of my novel looks like Achilles from fate/type-moon. So it does not misguide anyone as I don't ever mention that I will be taking Achilles' character itself; I only used his design. This means I refrained from using his personality and other traits that are unique to the character, but did use his looks, and only his looks. I cannot stress enough on the fact that I never mentioned that I would be using a character from fate/type-moon. So IMO it's not misguiding at all. Now onto your next point, which is your example of a story, which was if you made a DxD ff about King Arthur, you would use a photo of him (or Saber as it is Fate's version of King Arthur). Indeed you could, but that would be your choice. Additionally, your example is completely different from my story as my story is called One Piece - Supreme King. Never does it mention anything about Achilles' character in the title, or even fate/type-moon for that matter. For your example, the name of your character was in your title, so when you hypothetically made your cover image it would be of said character. Now in my story, I don't mention the character's name in the title, I do however use the character's design in the story. So it does fit because Achilles' looks do play a part in the story, it's just that it isn't Achilles himself being brought over. Your entire rant was to say how I am misguiding my readers when I believe I am not. How you will interpret this is up to you, but I do hope it cleared up any and all skepticism.
noname_marco
noname_marcoAuthornoname_marco

I'm sorry for the confusion, but nowhere in my story, synopsis, or tags do I suggest or imply that this story will be using type-moon characters. I used a character from the fate/type-moon series as my cover image; this was because he is one of my favourite characters from said series, and is what the MC's design is based on. Nowhere do I hint at the fact that it will be that character, or any other characters from that series, but merely the character design. I am genuinely terribly confused at where such thinking would stem from; if there was somewhere that I implied that I will be using the exact character, then feel free to DM me on discord or just reply to this message on where it was. Have a great rest of your day.

PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv4PerryThePlatypus

That's problem you could have used anything else as pic yet you use a pic of a character does have nothing to do with your story. It's comeptly misguided. Is I were to make a fan fic called king Arthur in dxd and use a pic of saber form fate who is king Arthur would you not assume that the mc had something to do with artoria

noname_marco
noname_marcoAuthornoname_marco

Ok in this case, you are right about me being able to use any cover image, I could use absolutely any cover image I fancied (as long as it is within WN's guidelines ofc) but you're wrong when you say it is completely misguided. It's really not, and I get the feeling you either did not fully read my previous reply, or you have not read the story at all. This is due to the fact as I previously mentioned twice that the MC's design was based on this character. The MC of my novel looks like Achilles from fate/type-moon. So it does not misguide anyone as I don't ever mention that I will be taking Achilles' character itself; I only used his design. This means I refrained from using his personality and other traits that are unique to the character, but did use his looks, and only his looks. I cannot stress enough on the fact that I never mentioned that I would be using a character from fate/type-moon. So IMO it's not misguiding at all. Now onto your next point, which is your example of a story, which was if you made a DxD ff about King Arthur, you would use a photo of him (or Saber as it is Fate's version of King Arthur). Indeed you could, but that would be your choice. Additionally, your example is completely different from my story as my story is called One Piece - Supreme King. Never does it mention anything about Achilles' character in the title, or even fate/type-moon for that matter. For your example, the name of your character was in your title, so when you hypothetically made your cover image it would be of said character. Now in my story, I don't mention the character's name in the title, I do however use the character's design in the story. So it does fit because Achilles' looks do play a part in the story, it's just that it isn't Achilles himself being brought over. Your entire rant was to say how I am misguiding my readers when I believe I am not. How you will interpret this is up to you, but I do hope it cleared up any and all skepticism.

PerryThePlatypus:That's problem you could have used anything else as pic yet you use a pic of a character does have nothing to do with your story. It's comeptly misguided. Is I were to make a fan fic called king Arthur in dxd and use a pic of saber form fate who is king Arthur would you not assume that the mc had something to do with artoria
Konrad_The_Fourth
Konrad_The_FourthLv4Konrad_The_Fourth

thanks for saving my time, thought the mc will be achilles

Ghost_Playing
Ghost_PlayingLv14Ghost_Playing

This review itself is just braindead. You pretty much jumped on a conclusion just based on the cover picture alone, which is just idiotic.

PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv4PerryThePlatypus

this review is in correlation to the name Achilles in the description and the picture of Achilles from the fate series which might mislead some people including me and other people who have made similar comments that this story has something to do with the fate series and has nothing to do with the actual story which I may add the author has already made a statement to address that issue but as you either have not read the comments or just not smart enough to understand if Bleach were to put Mister Clean on there building boards than people are going to assume the product that you are selling is Mister Clean

Ghost_Playing:This review itself is just braindead. You pretty much jumped on a conclusion just based on the cover picture alone, which is just idiotic.
Ghost_Playing
Ghost_PlayingLv14Ghost_Playing

Sure, what you say makes sense somewhat to people that can only see the surface of things as the cover is called "COVER" for a reason. And a lot of Authors only use the appearance instead of the whole character unless the title or synopsis of the story says otherwise. THIS IS WHY, paying attention when you read a title or synopsis helps much more than just assumung something based on the cover even if it might lead you to be disappointed once its only the appearance instead of the whole character that is going to be the mc. Thats why there is specifically a Quote for this situation if you haven't already heard it or forgot: "Don't judge a book by its COVER!". Do you understand now why this review still seems absolutely idiotic? If you can understand then all is good, if not then idc to bother speaking about it anymore.

PerryThePlatypus:this review is in correlation to the name Achilles in the description and the picture of Achilles from the fate series which might mislead some people including me and other people who have made similar comments that this story has something to do with the fate series and has nothing to do with the actual story which I may add the author has already made a statement to address that issue but as you either have not read the comments or just not smart enough to understand if Bleach were to put Mister Clean on there building boards than people are going to assume the product that you are selling is Mister Clean
PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv4PerryThePlatypus

sure because everybody reads a book before looking at the cover. the reason for a cover and a summary is to give an idea to the consumer what there going to read. one should not have to read a book to know what it is about he should be able to tell by the cover and the summary and that's why it needs to be as accurate as possible or it's no different from a YouTuber posting a video with a thumbnail that has nothing to do with or shows up in the video which is called clickbait whether intentional or not.

Ghost_Playing:Sure, what you say makes sense somewhat to people that can only see the surface of things as the cover is called "COVER" for a reason. And a lot of Authors only use the appearance instead of the whole character unless the title or synopsis of the story says otherwise. THIS IS WHY, paying attention when you read a title or synopsis helps much more than just assumung something based on the cover even if it might lead you to be disappointed once its only the appearance instead of the whole character that is going to be the mc. Thats why there is specifically a Quote for this situation if you haven't already heard it or forgot: "Don't judge a book by its COVER!". Do you understand now why this review still seems absolutely idiotic? If you can understand then all is good, if not then idc to bother speaking about it anymore.
image
Ghost_Playing
Ghost_PlayingLv14Ghost_Playing

lol did you even read my relpy properly? I never said to read the whole book but just the title and synopsis properly. And a Cover isn't clickbait especially not in this case since the mc looks like achilles that is on the cover? So there is nothing such as clickbait or something else that the Author did wrong here. After all 99% of the Authors take the Cover that fits their MC s appearance the closest. So if you can't deal with that fact then why not just ignore it? This review itself, is just you complaining about the cover. Nothing more nothing less. Which makes this review idiotic nontheless, SINCE a REVIEW is for the book CONTENT and not the COVER. Get it?

PerryThePlatypus:sure because everybody reads a book before looking at the cover. the reason for a cover and a summary is to give an idea to the consumer what there going to read. one should not have to read a book to know what it is about he should be able to tell by the cover and the summary and that's why it needs to be as accurate as possible or it's no different from a YouTuber posting a video with a thumbnail that has nothing to do with or shows up in the video which is called clickbait whether intentional or not.
PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv4PerryThePlatypus

it is you who still doesn't understand the point so a low me to dumb it done for you. if I make a book called strongest in one piece and the cover for the book is The Rock and the synopsis says come follow The Rock's journey in the search for adventure then people are going to assume it's about Dwayne whether it is intended or not. The reason I even chose to read the story is that I was looking for fate stories and when I realized it wasn't one I was disappointed and left. I had a point as I was not the only one to assume this to be the case yet out of nowhere you come trying to claim my comment as a review when I have not commented on the story, not only that but if you had read the comments you would understand where I was coming from as the author did as he all ready commented on the misundersting.

Ghost_Playing:lol did you even read my relpy properly? I never said to read the whole book but just the title and synopsis properly. And a Cover isn't clickbait especially not in this case since the mc looks like achilles that is on the cover? So there is nothing such as clickbait or something else that the Author did wrong here. After all 99% of the Authors take the Cover that fits their MC s appearance the closest. So if you can't deal with that fact then why not just ignore it? This review itself, is just you complaining about the cover. Nothing more nothing less. Which makes this review idiotic nontheless, SINCE a REVIEW is for the book CONTENT and not the COVER. Get it?
image
TheUltimateP1e
TheUltimateP1eLv4TheUltimateP1e

thats your problem, you couldve just used your fkng brain

PerryThePlatypus:That's problem you could have used anything else as pic yet you use a pic of a character does have nothing to do with your story. It's comeptly misguided. Is I were to make a fan fic called king Arthur in dxd and use a pic of saber form fate who is king Arthur would you not assume that the mc had something to do with artoria
PerryThePlatypus
PerryThePlatypusLv4PerryThePlatypus

When dumb people want to contribute something but aren't smart enough to have an actual educated point so all they can do is spit low-level insults similar to their intelligence. I pray that one day someone might care about your opinion because it ain't going be me.

TheUltimateP1e:thats your problem, you couldve just used your fkng brain