Review Detail of Kiti in Commonwealth
Review detail
Instead of calling this a novel, it is more accurate to call it a 'self-fulfiled' historical selfcast of the author. While the grammar is acceptable for a webnovel, going through thr prose is like wriggling through a wet and slimy mudfield, and the wormy content it holds is even more disgusting. The relish of the worst possible aspects of mankind like cruelty and rape, by a character purported to be a man of modern era, was disturbing to say the least. I could feel the author's jizz seeping out through his word as he tried to pretend his work as something else but a badly-written **** for his mental masturbation. The last sentence on ch.21 is perhaps the perfect way the author can describe himself and his mc: "I have a sick mind." To clarify the idea of "self-cast", this isn't uncommon in the genre of time-travel kingdom-building novel, as the genre in itself relies somewhat on the writer's interest and comprehension in history and the modern solutions he derived from his historical knowledge provide 'solutions' for the mc in his new environment, which more or less reflect the author's attitude and thinking on the mc. While you can see how much I detest this novel, one of the bigger aspect I've not mentioned yet is the lament for the author's historical knowledge. I've no doubt that he knows a lot about polish history, and I actually want to read and understand it, but the problem is not only is he a bad novelist, his view of the world, his champion of cruelty, his lack of remorse on promoting the recession of morality, are worse.
Commonwealth
MedTryglaw
Liked by 9 people
LIKEReplies10
So we agree. 1. The mc is cruel and a disgusting fictional character. 2. I don't like this story, so I will, and I quote you here, **** off and go read other instead. No problem. Already did. 3. The author admits he writes for his own enjoyment and doesn't care about us readers (thus my comment about self-fulfilment, wishfulfilment, and masturbation). So it seems you agree with all of these, what's your point again? Ps. No, I didn't go further in the story. I **** off after some early chapters out of disgust for this badly-written diary of a timetravel psychopath by a history nerd who I assume to hate the modern world and its value, and can't stand his reality so he create his own mediaeval perverted self-fulfiled fantasy world to escape the suffering of life. I mean, isn't this something a beta enjoy? Because a beta can't change his hierarchical circumstance in reality, he can only stroke his ego and indulge his escapism through perverted fantasy. And when someone comes in to pop that fantasy, his feeling is hurt, and he started telling other people to **** off and leave his fantasy alone.
Thenoicemaster:and also author mentioned everything you said. The author said that the mc is cruel sadistic and that if you don't like that to just read another book and that he' making thi novel for himself to have fun not for us
Thenoicemaster:Go **** off you probably found this book by typing evil mc getting what you asked for and went back to teading your beta mcs saving princesses at the drop of a hat
Kiti:So we agree. 1. The mc is cruel and a disgusting fictional character. 2. I don't like this story, so I will, and I quote you here, **** off and go read other instead. No problem. Already did. 3. The author admits he writes for his own enjoyment and doesn't care about us readers (thus my comment about self-fulfilment, wishfulfilment, and masturbation). So it seems you agree with all of these, what's your point again? Ps. No, I didn't go further in the story. I **** off after some early chapters out of disgust for this badly-written diary of a timetravel psychopath by a history nerd who I assume to hate the modern world and its value, and can't stand his reality so he create his own mediaeval perverted self-fulfiled fantasy world to escape the suffering of life. I mean, isn't this something a beta enjoy? Because a beta can't change his hierarchical circumstance in reality, he can only stroke his ego and indulge his escapism through perverted fantasy. And when someone comes in to pop that fantasy, his feeling is hurt, and he started telling other people to **** off and leave his fantasy alone.
đ Your review is weird. I didn't read the story yet. But let's see. You are giving a bad review to the author because his mc is a evil Psycho you can't stomach. But... The author from the start said that the story mc would be a evil Psycho that few would stomach.. ... ... So. ..what's the use of your review? A review generally warn prospective readers about if the author didn't keep his promises or a a shitty writer. For example an author who promise blood but do not show murder in 100 chapters. Or a chapter who premise vanilla relationship but give NTR. In this case , it's like seeing a story with the NTR tag. Reading. Then complaining about the NTR in the story. đ I am not lambasting you or anything. I am just curious about the use of this review
the review is a counter balance to all the positive spams, and is a way for me to opine my thought and feeling on the story and the writer. You may not find it useful, but others may. The world doesn't orbit around you or me, right? I gave negative review not only because of the mc, but because it's also a shitty novel. The evil mc is just a part of the distaste. The true offend is the bad writing. You should read the story for yourself, and form your opinion before trying to disregard mine. And in the end if you like it, that is fine. If you think my opinion isn't useful, that is fine. But don't engage me in a discussion when you have no idea what my review is about. Ps. what I'm looking for in this novel is historical transmigration: kingdom building, alternative history, battle, and such. Rape, murder, torture, slavery, exploitation, they don't offend me with believable world building and characterization. what I didn't looking for is the author's jizz in my eyes. If masturbation is what I want I would go to por-nhub, not webnovel.
HIKARU_GENJI:đ Your review is weird. I didn't read the story yet. But let's see. You are giving a bad review to the author because his mc is a evil Psycho you can't stomach. But... The author from the start said that the story mc would be a evil Psycho that few would stomach.. ... ... So. ..what's the use of your review? A review generally warn prospective readers about if the author didn't keep his promises or a a shitty writer. For example an author who promise blood but do not show murder in 100 chapters. Or a chapter who premise vanilla relationship but give NTR. In this case , it's like seeing a story with the NTR tag. Reading. Then complaining about the NTR in the story. đ I am not lambasting you or anything. I am just curious about the use of this review