Review Detail of CONCUSSIONARMY in 阿

A blind man who says to another person: Hey! you're going the wrong way! Isn't it hypocritical and ironic? An author who abandoned his/her story, most of the time it is due to lack of skill and another part may be due to personal problems. Now let me answer you about the 5 stars that, you think is not genuine: A few hours ago, the novel had 4.9 stars, now it went up again because more people gave 5 stars. Even on the first review page there is one with 4 stars and several with 4.5 If I simply wanted 5 stars, there would be no 4-star reviews, don't you think? In terms of popularity ... friend, the MGZ novel on which this Fic is based (I only use the world and some characters, the rest is all original) is a very unpopular novel compared to others. However, in less than two months, the novel made it into the top 30. Do you think I'm killing the popularity of the novel? Well, this does not seem to be the case.

Don't delete it because its review is not designed to cause harm, unlike yours, which was written only out of envy ;)

I once wrote to him in one of his chapters that his theme was similar to that of yang chen, of my beautifil CEO, and I delete it hahahaha, so don't expect much from this author

So you say but here you are, you continue reading my novel. You seem to expect a lot from my LMAO ~

Envy? I neither write nor am I interested in doing so. In my review I commented on something that I found tremendously stupid (the beauty list) and said that your novel is mediocre (like the vast majority of this site). you're just a crybaby / little *****.

If you find my novel so mediocre, what are you still doing hanging around it? It seems you're just another hypocrite who complains but reads on the sly, like a bookworm. Besides, if you're so disgusted with the website, why are you still here? Huh? Go somewhere else and stop whining like a rat, mama's boy. You're just generating sympathy.

Did I hurt your feelings? I'm so sorry. 😂😂 At no point did I say that I didn't like the site (reading comprehension problems?). Mediocre means average, fair, or barely adequate. Hope it helps you understand the meaning of the word.

Mediocre means: nothing to highlight, more bad than good. Now do you understand, hypocrite? If the site is as bad as you say, go on, read somewhere else and stop being pitiful here. No one will try to comfort you, Mommy's boy. If you don't know the meaning of a word, then don't give an opinion, you'll only embarrass yourself more than you already do by commenting on a novel that, according to you, is mediocre. In fact, this novel is so mediocre that Original MGZ is not a very well known novel, in fact it's quite unfamiliar. And yet, I managed to make a Fic based on that novel into the top 20 in less than 2 months. Ufff yes bro, too mediocre lmao~

Hey, at no point have I said that your story is bad, has a good plot and is entertaining, what I comment here is what you did with my comment and how you are not interested in bad reviews (even those that had nothing wrong, like my comment) and if I still read your story, it is because it has nothing to do with how you are as a person

Uhhh amigo que pesado, deja llorar y anda a dormir la concha de tu madre.

Oh well, you are more reasonable than I thought. Meh, the negative reviews if I accept them as long as they make sense, if you go to the first page you can see one with 4 stars and several with 4.5 However, I do not accept criticism from envious people, as the case of the person above :v

HAHAHAHAHAHHA LOOOOL~ I swear you made me laugh! What happened, mommy baby ??? angry??? HAHAHAHAHA lol! Go drink your milk, it's too late for you!

damn this is the same problem but slighty different. not only do you have no way to really tell that someone is envious of you but who cares if they are. does that mean their criticism is invalid by default? and if you respond please tell me how you gained the power to know the intentions of people through thier criticism of your work.

i quess my other reply would have fit better as a reply to this message

i dont want to diss your novel as ive never read it but top 30 in the fanfic category hardly means anything in terms of how good the novel actually is. this is not to say your novel is bad as, again, ive never read it but there are some really bad novels in top 30. also the whole blind man thing is a logical falisy. your seting up an argument based on your own argument, it isnt grounded. The best way for me to put it this way: everyone in the world is wearing sunglasses and you cant see their eyes. assuming in this situation their eyes are who they really are, their opinions, skillset,etc. and that the sunglasses are the internet. You assume that the person who tells you you are going the wrong way is blind because they dont agree with you. But you also assume that everyone who says your going the right way has good eyesight. you have no way to tell if any of these people are right and should simply think about what they are saying and try to fix mistakes that you have made. again this is not saying ttaht everyone that goes against you is right but that doesnt mean that they are all wrong. This also means not everyone agreeing with you is right. i feel like its better to listen to criticism then forget about it because x, x and x said that your novel was perfect

For example: If you criticize someone for being blind, you intend to make fun of them. You don't need to know more than that.

First: The novel is in the top 15, not 30. Second: No offense, that thought is pretty silly. What you're doing is literally this: PHILOSOPHY. What's the point of coming to talk about relative truths here? Laws exist as well as truth exists. There is no need to try to block the sun with a finger. Let's be realistic, please.

?what is this a response to

you do realize this is the exact same problem i started with. im trying to show you how dumb it is to dismiss everyone with a different opinion than you on the internet. i did this by building upon the original metephor you made. i pointed out how your metephor does not make since in the context of an anonymous platform (spoiler: were on one). And now you seem to be doing a very similar thing to what my argument was trying to show. you dismissed the situation i created as "unrealistic" because its not whats actually happing. so ill tell you whats actually happening (which makes no since in an argument as clearly your of the opinion that what is happening is fine) Whats actually happing: There is an author who rights a novel. He knows nothing about the people reading his novel. but anytime someone tells him a certain part of his novel is not very, he assumes that they are envious, unskilled, or have malicious intent. Of course he has no way to know this as he doesnt know who the person really is. In doing this he is dismissing perfectly good criticism as not important or unfair. This is the just of my problem. of course for all i know everyone that writes a criticism of your novel is wrong and what they are pointing out is fine just the way it is. but this doesnt mean you should not care about it. this is a problem that goes beyond just wriing a novel. if you think this way irl to then problems could arrise. if you always think your the smartest one in the room at all times then you put a barriers on communication. mabye you know 5 times the amount of species of animal than the person next to you. but at the same time they know 2 time the amount of a types of bacteria. if you communicate with the realization that you might be able to learn from each other then you both gain. in the contexf of a review on your novel your the only one who can gain things by considering criticism. There is of course a different situations in which the other person doesnt know what they are talking about and thats why you never take what non professionals say (or criticism from non professionals) as fact. you consider the plausibility of it and even ask other sources and come to you own conclusions. Tldr: you can always learn something by talking to people with the intent to learn Sorry if this was a bit long. i wanted to cover all bases. i prob wont respond to you unless you give me an arguement that i feel is an actual counter arguement and not just "this is not realistic" as analogies are one of the most commonly used argument devices and thats what my original arguement was