Review Detail of CIiff_Hanger in 0008000X00008000

Writing Quality: 4/5 This is because there are a number of grammatical errors but they don't get in the way of the story progression so the quality is still high as he can get his thoughts across. To fix this he could use a website like grammarcheck.net or grammarly.com Stability of Updates: 3/5 Mainly because he is threatening to drop this because of a few negative reviews which in my opinion are not very hateful and are quite accurate on the flaws of this novel. Story Development: 1/5 One reason it is low is because it is a fan-fiction and he is a fan-boy who is following the story line and is basically a side character right now. The other reason is that the author does a 1734 year, 9 months and 5 days time skip. Which by the way, increases the stats of the MC by around 10 but it also restricts his stats by 90% meaning that the strength rise was irrelevant and the time-skip had no purpose other than because the author could not think of anything original to write. To fix this he could just think more and actually devote time rather than getting sad from some, rightly so, negative reviews on the character of the MC. Character Design: 3/5 probably lower. The MC is a fan-boy. This is apparent instantly on how he just melts around them. This is annoying as it is just frankly, an excuse to make the MC a side-character. The MC is also dumb. Like really dumb. He puts no thought into his actions, like going to meet Thor when he is cursed by Odin, which shows resentment between the Asgardians. Another problem about the MC is that he just so happens to think out loud at 'random' points which 'conveniently' give important information to the original cast. To fix this, remove his curses and stop making him an idiot. World Background: 1/5 Even as a fan-fiction this is just poor. He barely described his house, except the fact that it is a mansion and that things are gold. Also its a fan-fiction so you can't really get this to 5 stars anyway. Can not really be fixed now. Also the rating is not accurate since a fifth of the reviews belong to one person which is just a massive turnaway.