Review Detail of Kasaix in Vampire: the Masquerade - Nirvana

Well with all due respect, in my opinion, the way you want me to tell the story really only works for a tabletop game where everyone actually takes part in playing so they will need to pay attention to the rules and make sense of them first, and won't find it boring or troublesome--because they are actual players, but for a novel it won't work. When reading novels everyone is only a bystander who reads through the events in texts, and if you spend too much time explaining things at one time, people will just walk away--because they are just bystanders and mere rules and background info don't matter to them like people who actually play the games. To take another example like A Song of Fire and Ice--for a novel series that is built on a completely fantasized world, George R. R. Martin clearly needs to provide lots of information on this world and his world background is known to be extremely complex, but he NEVER explains everything clearly everytime a new term comes up, instead, he hides and scatters info in the conversations, let the readers do a small deduction based the context to know what is going on, and only explains the smallest amount of necessities in the plainest way, and if he puts on his background settings in the way you want me to, nobody would ever want to read it or find it attractive, because it will simply be a heavy history book. It is the same way that Tolkin did the Lord of the Rings, too. I'm not saying that I can be compared to these masters, or my novel is exactly the same type as theirs, but at least I believe it's enough to prove that I should learn and follow their ways of story-telling, instead of the one you are suggesting. And if I may point out, though your reading process says you've finished C14, I don't think you really "read" the book, because if you do, you would at least notice that the MC did fight a very hard battle on her own afterwards and almost died in the process. If I dare to make this bald assumption, because you assume you know the game back and forward and deeply believe that the way you've been doing a tabletop game should be the right way even for a novel, despite the fact that these two are totally different things, you didn't take enough care to read through the text. So again with all due respect, I don't think this is a proper review, because a book review should at least judge the novel according to the standard of judging a novel, and this review doesn't. In fact if I may say so, I feel deeply hurt by these words--not because you criticizing me or I think you rated my book too low, for I've received lots of critiques like you can see from above and I didn't ever complain or hide them or delete them, and everytime I communicate with my reviewers very seriously and patiently, but this time I didn't feel like it's even a review.

If you disagree with my opinion of your review you can post your ideas under here, but I won't further reply because I don't want this to become an argument where no one really cares about anything but winning the other (which is where online argument always ends up) , and if you post any other review that I deem to be a troll I will delete it--but I won't delete this one, and I will review your book back exactly in the way I've posted in my thread without any intention of depicating it for subjective reasons :D

okay so let me make things clear. As I said at the start I don't normally review books I just comment down my thoughts and this review was exactly like that. After finishing reading all the chapters I just put down whatever I thought when I read your novel. Secondly I never claimed that my opinion was right or your opinion was wrong or because this novel is set in the world of a table top RPG it should follow the same rules what I said was simply put there were too much terminology not enough explanation. Third of all I the surviving the sabbath attack on her own was just a suggestion about a possible arc that you could use, I didn't claim that MC didn't have any fights or this books doesn't have any fights or etc. About the George R. R. Martin situation that depends on the perspective of the author. For example I personally prefer that the reader knows what the MC knows and doesn't know what he does not. But as I said before that is just personal preference. Lastly I must apologise if my review or whatever it is that I have written have hurt you. That was never the intention and they were just my honest opinions about it and that's about it. As you should be aware every person has their way of doing things and what I have written was just what I would have done if I were the one to be writing that novel and that's about it.