Review Detail of drefond in Runes of Hecate

When I started reading your review, honestly, I was really happy. I thought I could make some substantial changes based on feedback(I've made a couple of changes based on comments alone). However, after reading into it and finding out that you misinterpreted lots of things, I realized that it's not a reliable basis for any changes I could make. Sorry about that. Let me point out some details for you because it seems to me that you misunderstood a lot of details in the story. But before that, let me first apologize. After writing a bunch of chapters, I did realize that the mages'(the center of this novel) strength is portrayed vaguely. I thought that I was able to make things clear that they were essentially superhumans, even without awakening to an element. My poor attempt in portraying this is by showing rather than telling. Aeon's extreme speed, Samuel being able to survive without food and water for way beyond what humans can achieve, not dying when hit by gigantic creatures. It's poorly conveyed. Alright, onto the clarification. 1. "because the hell they were in a forest full of animals stronger than them, acting strangely, grouping etc, and not only not reporting when they did not run away, that is, when they went to run away, he coincidentally finds stronger animals that will kill them, then the protagonist who was "sleeping" wakes up and finds a way with things easily" Not all animals there were stronger than them. As I said, they are superhumans. If you're referring to them not being able to handle colossal beasts, then that's only natural. As I've stated in the story, mages start being able to take care of colossal beasts, one on one, at D-rank. I don't see grouping as acting strangely, tbh. Also, they did not run away. It was Levi who drew the line that portrayed their estimated limit. Not the academy staff. They knew about potentially dangerous areas and Levi already took that into account. As to why they "coincidentally" find stronger animals that will kill them, isn't this in the title already? "Chapter 47: What Shouldn't Be There" As far as they know, those things shouldn't be there. The chances of that happening is slim to none, so they found no reason to prepare for it. And it was explained later on why they happened to be--because those creatures were planning to leave the forest and are moving towards the camp's direction. About his power-up, this was essential to lead to the closing of the first volume. However, you did not get to that, considering that you stopped at ch75. 2. "the teachers who they should be smart and knowledgeable act childish and inexperienced (going out into a clearly foreign forest and unable to escape when they get into trouble)" How much did you actually absorb in the story to come to this conclusion? Long before the students went to Grey Forest, the people of the Florentine Empire have been there multiple times already to purge it of magical beasts. I've stated this clearly. In fact, I mentioned in the story that their recent Purging is only a few months ago. The Forest is in NO WAY foreign. You'll find out later if you continued reading that even the principal went to that forest a few years ago lmao. If you're referring to it being foreign to the students, they have maps. They were briefed about dangerous areas(as I've said they know about the forest already). They were reminded to stay close in the outskirts. They were about to challenge the deeper parts, but when they saw the "Strongest Team" get destroyed, they were about to turn back. They only proceeded because Samuel was left behind. You advocate "I would prefer that he had lost the game to enter the magic academy, and had entered the military academy, would bring more weight in history" but don't encourage unforeseen events? Unable to escape? But they did.

3. "the protagonist manages to shiver with anger and pay no attention to the sores etc., while less experienced students stay calm" Which character are you referring to? Because for sure this isn't Aeon. He only loses his composure by the end of Season 1, but you didn't reach that so you shouldn't have known about it. Less experienced students stay calm? They are all without experience. Everything is new to them. 4. "the protagonist despite having "suffered" because of his own recklessness remains reckless and even this punishment has a very weak effect" IMO, outside of the part where he gets blasted in the entrance examination, he didn't really do anything extreme that resulted in "suffering." Usually, when that's the case, humans don't change their ways. We always think, "Well, I didn't get hurt, didn't I?" 5. "creates a sword technique" This isn't an Eastern Fantasy. His sword technique, although flashy, is garbage. You think it's easy making a sword technique? You should be thinking about this as an experienced reader. This would be brought up in the future, of course. Someone is bound to point this out. 6. "ancient constitution" Where did you get this? There is no such term. Even if you copy and paste every chapter in a Word document and search for the word ancient, nothing would pop up. I haven't used the word ancient in the whole novel so far. 7. "nobody dies" Oh, boy. Do you know why this novel is tagged as tragedy even before anybody dies? Because people will. 8. "since the protagonist defeats or manages to escape everythin" If you reached the end of Season 1, you'll know that the protagonist himself dies, being unable to escape. If you did not find this reply enlightening, then I apologize. Also, sorry for my tone. It just infuriates me when people point out things that are already addressed but they just don't know about because they didn't read the story further.

god luck read all. it's gone good hours of my day. i will go read the replie.

Alright, I was too lazy to review so it gets poorer and less detailed than I usually do (not an excuse, just get other reviews for a look), and since the author replied I want to specify more what I think it was bad, first of all, making it clear that this is my opinion and what I felt while reading the book, the criticism probably had several non-detailed points, because it was made from memory of the first run I did (I was tracking when you stopped to rest / review? I forgot the reason, but I stopped 5 or 6 chapters before the end of the book, the part where it arrives in town and protects some people from the monsters, or the part where the mysterious mountain collapses and There are some guys who get stuck there and a humanoid demon comes through the party I think, 'cause the chaps counter reset (I don't know). Moreover this criticism is made to pay attention to the reason why I abandoned the work, it is not possible that it was only me to abandon it for this reason, then I read the work again until chap 75. about the strength of wizards: I don't feel that they are strong even though, why? I have no idea, in other works when they say that someone is strong, I feel that he is strong, I do not know how to explain, maybe it has to do with my immersion. It's like when Thanos arrives at the scene or when the choper eats three of the golden balls or the awe protagonist gets pissed off, he did nothing, but you know he's strong, if he knows he gave ****. the punches of giant criticism and survive much longer hunger and thirst, thankfully you spoke in the answer, in fact I had not realized these facts ... my fault. about the escape: "not all animals were stronger than them", yes, they were not, but the advantage of animals and the reason they were not cleaned is because there are so many of them? so the amount, being in a hostile environment and possible colossal nearby (they were with someone injured, weren't they?), they came to the conclusion that standing still and waiting, since a wave of animals had already passed through the camp, was the best choice. ? "But they had someone injured, so they decided to wait and see if he woke up," was staying in a cave really a good choice? Did they know where the animals were at a certain time of day for a certain time? instead of hiding, wasn't it better to run away while the strong animals weren't around? "would they have to carry someone too big," didn't they end up carrying the heavier protagonist? (I'm not sure about the weight, so I'm probably talking ****). With that presented, how did they know that this time of day was safe for them to leave? "Because they'll become a standard for a while," did they rely on a "standard" for no apparent reason for animals that are not normally organized and still waited a few days to further increase the possibility that they would stop meeting? From my point of view the odeal would be that they had spent the night in the cave and the very next day had checked the phenomenon and as soon as they checked to run as fast as possible to report the event, they had the time to plan it. "I don't see the group acting weird," ???? The fact that they are grouping is not strange ??? maybe that was my misinterpretation?

the next paragraph got confused (translator translated wrong) so i'll jump the burst in power had explanation? I still don't like bursts like that ... so it is just like my opinion, you can ignore. about the forest: were you a foreigner? as from outside the country? It was strange, abnormal, so to speak of the roar and wave of animals, the fact that the forest has already been swept away only leaves the cluster of animals, the most wave and the most strange (strange) roar? and the forest was not a part of a much larger one that was not cleared because it had many animals? So the fact that a very loud roar and running animals would not make it clear that perhaps stronger and larger animals are coming? Shouldn't teachers have noticed, suspected, or at the very least checked? And about them going to a dangerous part of the forest to save the guy, they risked the lives of many people to save someone who, against all odds, might have been alive? it would be nicer and add more weight to the story if they went and found his dead body or stinging (this kind of thing is important for me to feel that the characters are in real danger instead of saving themselves for that and that) But this part is only my opinion.

"But doesn't it encourage unforeseen events?" I urge unforeseen events, not random events, you treat the encounter with animals as a surprise, and they have waited a long time in a hostile place putting faith in an abnormal event, it is not unforeseen to feel your hand forcing you to find the power and heroism of the protagonist about twists and unforeseen read "Reborn: Apocalypse", no more on weebnovels ... there are pirates and there are on amazon ... that is unforeseen, realize that he creates the world before presenting unforeseen events and even if initially in history it seems absurd, but you do not doubt when it comes to the point of verification or not, not doubt the possibility but it is surprising when it happens "Unable to escape? But they did." escaped? or did you let them escape? "3." the protagonist can shake with anger and pay no attention to wounds, etc., while less experienced students are calm "A". translator, I was talking about the michel (teacher), in the part that I was referring to was the rescue, that in fact I was wrong he keeps calm to distrust the hidden animal, he was irritated, then I already associated not being calm, but the fact that the protagonist held on to a rescue situation while risking his life to rescue another is strange, although I understand the logic, but as no situation was presented where the justification was valid, there was no situation where the stranger would be arrested and studied.

"Usually, when that's the case, humans don't change their attitude. We always think, 'Well, I didn't get hurt, did I?'", I completely agree, so I think I should have more punishment in that part, didn't you? nothing that was not reckless? jump on animal waves to train and stay in a clearly dangerous forest, try to save someone who was almost confirmed dead, "but he was alive" was he? or you left him alive, back in the punishment, I think seeing someone dead would be a good punishment and take that childish part of the protagonist, break this illusion of ours and the protagonists of maybe he's alive, even if he shouldn't. "Your sword technique, though flashy, is rubbish," rubbish? compared to the ones that haven't appeared yet or the ones he hasn't seen? I think the fact that he created one, even trash, is the problem because he uses it, if it's bad why use it? if it's just naming moves he already uses, then it's pointless, and it bothers me (at least uncomfortably) that he created a functional sword technique with no basis. "6." old constitution "" ta goole translated very well, I think it was burst constitution, or I was not saying he had an old constitution, but prior to the burst I think, another good point was the need for put to improve so suddenly? I think it would be better if there was a small change and instead the protagonist was developing it along with other techniques, it would also be more interesting if he was really weak against very large animals and this reflected in the story but when faced with humanoid demons he fight better with them, giving his team a bigger meaning, he can't beat (or suffer a lot) the bigger animals but he could deal better with demons, I imagine the demons can handle many mages of the same level because he is very agile and has a very strong constitution to tank the spells. "Oh, boy. Do you know why this novel is marked as tragedy before anyone even dies? Because people will.", ... 100 chapters, 0 deaths, even though there are plenty of opportunities to baptize the protagonists, not the death of the disabled father, but deaths from imprudence for making hasty and wrong decisions, deaths must have something brought with them, a consequence, motivation, or in the event a baptism put in their heads that reckless self-confidence causes death, good examples are death. of kaito in hunter x hunter by, not carelessly, but by weakness, the death of the sun sword in kimetsu no yaiba by, again, weakness, I can't remember death by recklessness ... city of sin has ... but it is well advanced in history, he recklessly attempted to tank (or brace himself, he underestimated the dimension) something he clearly could not, so instead of sacrificing several special knights he has a much greater loss. "8." as the protagonist defeats or manages to escape everything "

If you reached the end of Season 1, you will know that the protagonist himself dies, being unable to escape. ", Take it in the ass, the hype is growing ... that phrase is pulling my interest ... I will try the last chapters From the first book, I'll be back maybe. but I think I could tell that I was more advanced in history since I talked about details after the 75 chaps, right? this criticism is just to make it clear why I dropped the story for the next to be better, I still think the story has a lot of problems, I think the main thing is how much information each chapster has too much time to happen , and has no appeal to the other keys to hold me to the high points, at least in my opinion that may be that of a percentage of the people who left the work. As for the aggressive tone, it took me about 2 hours to write this, I imagine spending several hours writing something for many months is not easy, so of course you would be annoyed when someone you think has not read much of the story of Opinions about the work, but understand that 75 capitos are a few days of full reading, and the story did not hold me in it, for the above reasons, and the google translator also did not help, but I would like you to take into account the points that I I pointed and not simply discard them, it would be good for you also to see the works I quoted to understand better what I mean, but only if you have time, they are good works, they pay for themselves that I can say. Kimetsu has only 25 episodes to understand well what I mean by feeling the strength of the characters, the other works take a long time to reach the point I was thinking. hunter x hunter has 148 ep, what I quoted happens at 110 I think city ​​of sin happens in book 5 I think, right after coming back from the dimension that he fell kimetsu no yaiba has 25 eps i think it ends with this scene i said Reborn: Apocalypse happens in the final half of book 2 ... which is very big, is being released on weebnovel and has the avalon of seven elements happening in the first big change of the series I think in the first 40 cha**ters? Just before I think. If you read all this, then thanks for the time and patience there is a lot of text here. My reviews are made for the authors, if you want to read other of them (if you have patience), and I only review works with potential and with authors with strength to release so many chapters I'll put the work back not my library and try to read until the end of book 1 to see if it binds me again. are 11120 digits.acho that was almost the biggest answer I ever gave.

Read this and your issue will be clarified. This has been there since I posted the chapter. This isn't something I edited to cater to your misinterpretation. Chapter 047: What Shouldn’t Be Here - An hour ago, the beasts should have already started leaving, so they could already exit the cave whenever they want. They had been observing the area for a few days now so they were actually quite familiar with the area. They knew where some beasts stayed, and they knew where birds built up their nests. After confirming that the area was indeed clear, the group picked up the pace and started running. They couldn’t waste any more time, after all. After half a day, they should be able to reach the camp. TL;DR They know when the Lake Beasts(the ones you are referring to) are not there. They have been staying there for a few days already and have already done the "studying" that you are suggesting. Groupings are not weird. There's the concept of mage classes(Seran and Remoran). Remorans need Seran to basically tank for them while they cast magic from behind. That's just the general idea of it. Of course, they could do solo, but to be on the safer side which the Academy also took into account, they train in groups.

Chapter 40: The Strongest Team - When Mark was patrolling the area around the cave they were about to search, he realized that, somehow, the path towards the area where the Ur Trees grow was devoid of magical beasts. There were absolutely no monsters. It was too silent that it could be described as eerie. Suddenly, they thought about something. Instead of searching for the Spirit Fox Gem, they did not enter the cave they were supposed to search and moved at full speed towards the Ur Trees. After two hours of continuous running, they finally arrived on site. Thankfully, the area was also deserted. TL;DR Mark informed them that there were no magical beasts in that area for half a day. This was not something they would do out of recklessness. This was not risking the lives of many to save one. After they confirmed this happening, they went and exploited it.

Tbh, I can't understand your first paragraph. As far as I could tell, you're comparing some other novel to mine which I would discourage. This novel is unique in its own way. I'm not ranting about anyone in Monkey D Luffy's crew not dying, am I? About their escape. There was an A-ranked mage guarding the students. Of course, they would be able to escape lol. In fact, they left without even encountering the Lake Beasts. How is this an issue?

It seems to me that your only issue is that you want someone dead to teach the protagonist a lesson. So just because I do not intend to make this happen, the novel is already bad? If that's the case, then your review is too shallow, is it? The text is already there. They didn't die. Only the civilians did. This isn't something that I could fix going forward, is it? You're saying that we should kill someone to punish the main character. After that, what happens? He doesn't participate in any fights anymore then the novel will end just like that? Do you think the main character has the time to mourn the deaths of his friends if they died, and train for 2 years to prevent any more deaths just like Monkey D Luffy did? No, he doesn't. Time is pressing onto him especially because of the Eclipse phenomenon. Even if all of his friends die, time won't stop. Sera City will be destroyed. There won't be time for Aeon to have this "baptism" you are talking about. The problem with your review is that you have this false sense that character development should happen in the first 100 chapters through a single event. You don't consider it being progressive and accumulative.

I don't discourage negative comments nor reviews prior to the end of the novel. However, please make it something that I could fix going forward. That's what constructive criticism is all about. If this is how you usually review work, please wait until the novel is finished. That way you can say all you want that the novel is bad because of something that wasn't fixed ever. I also checked your other reviews because you told me to. It turns out, you even reviewed a novel poorly WITHOUT EVEN READING IT. You only read the Synopsis and already deemed it bad.

1- the first paragraph is confusing to me (google translate is not god), but I still hit the point that they should have just turned their backs and run, but apparently we won't be able to agree on that, so forget that. 2- I am not comparing, I am exemplifying to better pass my opinion and his work is not original, almost none is, has some original points as; his father and he are in an "enemy" country ... nothing else? all the other features I've seen in other works, of course not this way, in these situations, but variations don't renew the genre, but it doesn't matter a good work doesn't have to have originality, it has to convince what it says, so I I hit Mark's death point, not only because of the protagonist's baptism, but when you say: It's dangerous, I can trust you and feel tense, but at that point where you say it's dangerous to the group stronger than them. would die, so sacrifice something, then say it had no consequence, how am I going to trust you? every time you say it's dangerous, you can't believe it loses the ******* it should have to fear for the protagonists' lives. It's not my only problem, but this is where history loses its way, the work is not original and There is no *******, only the mystery is left, which, for me, is nothing interesting. Good examples of this are the anime In Another World with My Smartphone and one punch: two very strong protagonists, but in one you fear for the life of the second and the other not. 2- about the teacher being A and being strong: you do not have our confidence to simply impose that someone is strong does not work and expect me to believe for no reason, especially you having to just lie to me (if you said it was a deadly situation , sacrifices someone and then comes back saying he's fine, it's a lie), and surprisingly, for you who know all the levels of strength and who is in each place at every moment, since you are the author, it may seem obvious that they will come out alive and that a class A is strong, but you are not. passed it on to me, I don't know that a class A is strong 3- Progressive evolution: What evolution did you have in 100 chaps? He didn't need to be sorry for two years, but it would help to put some trust points in you. 4 - about the power burst: if this would be explained later, a situation should have been set up where it would not only seem like an increase in random power, as it is, it is just a random burts that takes more confidence points. 5-what is written can not be fixed, but which point is not constructive? where they are no longer applicable? Do you think I'm here to tell you how the story should go? Criticism is another point of view, for this same or future work, there is no perfect work, and if one person were sufficient to make a good story, there would be only good works. 6- you clearly did not read the criticism, I made it clear that it was my opinion and not a criticism, and on top of that an opinion about the synopsis and not about the work, just choosing the smallest to find a reason for criticism is not a Good point. Learning the difference between opinion, criticism and comment is important.

this ends another review

Now that you've come this far already, did you ever consider that the reason why you're not understanding the logic behind the story is because of a language barrier? Again, the decisions they make is based on their own abilities. They found an opportunity go get Samuel(no monsters during morning), so they get him. Simple as that! They took advantage of a loophole in the system and get rewarded for it. Thep characters did the logical thing, so why should they die? I explained this in the story. In fact, if Samuel died there, with his tunneling ability, he would have been stupid. See here. IF I cheated his way out of it, then that would be bad. You can mock me for that IF that were the case. But that wasn't the case. Far from it. I didn't force Samuel's unnecessary death because Samuel had means of keeping himself alive. Just because he was left alone to fend for himself didn't mean that he should die. Short bursts of power. You said that if it would be discussed in the future, then I should have at least hinted that he would become stronger. I did, didn't I? He fell of a cliff and was completely unharmed. If this did not trigger the transformation in him, I don't know what would. Did you perhaps overlook it? When you say that it's your opinion, and not criticism, then it should not be posted as a Review. That is a comment. Here's the definition of review by Cambridge Dictionary: to think or talk about something again, in order to make changes to it or to make a decision about it. "Choosest smallest to find a reason for criticism" Sigh. You don't understand. You put your comment on the synopsis as a Review, that is what makes it wrong. Did this ever come to you? Do you realize that Reviews are important for authors? It can build and tear down works. Your "Review" is tearing it down for only its synopsis. Why not delete it?