Great story so far definitely a story I will look forward too each week for a binge read. Keep up the good work.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Greetings all! A sincere Thank You for reading my first novel. Feel free to comment so that I can improve along the way as well. I will also try my utmost best to publish a chapter each day. (I need to find a blender that can squeeze out all those brain juices) Please let me be bold and brazen to put a five star rating! Teehee~

I haven't read the story yet, but do hope you don't overpower your character early ,on, honestly i'm hoping its kinda like randidly the ghost hound on royal road

I not read yet but i hope to autor not destroy his own mc make mc like saint bastard i hate it. Exaple when you enemy rape you sister what mc do ? coz mc is saint to the bone he forgive him and become friend with him lol so saint like shiiit

Reveal spoiler

Hey there! Good day for writing! If you wanted to see whether you can get paid by distributing the current work or getting financial support by writing new work, you might want to contact rebecca.review@outlook.com. A brief introduction, some sample charpters or links will be appriciated when reaching out.

Cool novel 🤗😎😎😋😃😋😋😎😍😘😍😎😁😂😍😘😘😗😙😙😗😍😎😋😋😎😘🤔🙂😏😐😋😊😋😍😙😐🤗🙂😎😗😗😇😎😘😐🤗🙂😋😗😐😍😎😘😐🤔🙂🤗😘😑😑🤔😎😎😗😮😣😍😆🐴🐖🐷😎😍😘😐😗😅

words? Exactly? One of the novelties of the Internet era is that journalism has been freed from the constraints of the printed page. Instead of conforming to the conventions of the column, the quarter page, the half page—limits that often meant unfortunate last-second cuts—the writer could now make the story as short or as long as seemed right. But what is right? A regular reader of The Guardian online, I often find its featured articles tiresomely long and rambling. You scroll down, imagining the piece almost over, and instead it goes on, and on. There should have been some warning at the beginning telling you how many words lie ahead. So, no sooner does the Internet give us oceans of space than we realize that length was never just a problem of column inches. As with the editing process, which I discussed in a previous post, there is the question of an understanding between writer and reader about what kind of reading experience is being offered. Readers like to suppose that their favorite writers—journalists, novelists, or poets—are absolutely independent, free from all interference, but the truth is that if an author indulges his own private idiolect or goes on for too long, he can at best expect to divide readers into those who admire him slavishly, whatever he throws at them, and those who set him aside in desperation. At worst he will be left with no readers at all. Is there a relationship between a writer’s respect for these conventions and the content or tone of what he writes, the kind of opinions we can expect him to have? I have recently been re-reading Dickens, who published his novels in weekly or monthly installments with strict limits on both the number of words in each installment (around 18,500 for a monthly and 4,700 for a weekly) and the total number of installments (twenty for a monthly, thirty or more for the weekly). Many other novelists published in this way of course, but few relished the form as Dickens did. His contemporary Trollope would write an entire book before allowing its serialization to begin, so anxious was he to stay in control, while Thomas Hardy intensely disliked working for the popular magazines, with the propriety they demanded, and reserved the right to publish an uncensored version in a single volume when the serialization was through. By contrast, Dickens did not worry about having the plot entire in his head before he started, and enjoyed the constant feedback from readers, which arguably influenced the shape his stories took. Only once, on the death of his wife’s

Very good character backgrounds..details of various planes is quite good, story advancement is kind of fast paced..comically satisfying..chaoter release is so so..overall i will say that the book is satisfactory, it is good but can still be better, especially with thr typograohical errors.. Thank you for the good read and i hope this can stay free for as long as possible, im just a poor daoist and i rely only on faily free spirit stones:) thank you