1. Continuity in the novel is intermittent. For example, when the hero of the novel begins training his assistants, he finishes the training, and everyone he trained has become masters of the technique in which they were trained. The novel is an expression of a beginning and an end, and there is no process in the middle. The novel makes you feel that it is a summary more than it is a novel. 2 The gender of the protagonist varies from one chapter to the next, sometimes male and sometimes female. 3. The hero of the novel does not have an important presence in the novel. His mission is to defeat powerful enemies to show his presence in the novel and to talk sarcastically about his character being cautious and that he wants to live in peace and prosperity and problems come to him. This is all I have about the hero of the novel because there is nothing else about him. 4 The translation is bad In the details and there is no editing. Overall, the novel is considered third-rate. Frankly, it does not suit me. The theme or idea of ​​the novel is good, but the execution is very bad. If you want a similar novel but it is better in all aspects, you can search for a novel called (Vongola Primo in One Piece).

He's supposed to be in Ravenclaw

Are you serious? The protagonist loves magic and studies it even in a world where there is no magic. Because the protagonist has the talent for knowledge and old magic, the hat sends him to Gryffindor. Dude, read the original story or watch the movies before writing fan fiction.

Here is a hole in the logic of this fan fiction. In the original story, the students are arranged in alphabetical order of the family names, the protagonist Jonathan Blackwood begins his family name with the letter B and Hermione Granger's last name begins with the letter G The protagonist is supposed to be before Hermione Granger and the others like Harry Potter etc.

This review will be deleted after errors are corrected

I have read longer than you. I have reached chapter 48, and to be honest, the novel becomes worse. The hero of the novel becomes childish, stupid, and a bully to the point that I do not want to read this novel anymore.

1+

The novel is very good, but the childhood period is kind of annoying, especially when the hero of the novel is kind of arrogant. I wish I could give him a fistful of love from One Piece.

Magic is supposed to be unreal. When you set limits to magic, you are setting limits for yourself, your imagination, and the imagination of everyone who reads the novel. The beauty of the Harry Potter story: 1: We, as readers of the book, do not know everything in the story, and this ambiguity makes the story suspenseful. 2: There are no limits to magic. Spells do not have limits, but rather depend on understanding the spell, control, and experience in using magic, will, and feelings. Feelings in particular increase the power of the spell by a large factor, and there is a difference between the feelings of love, anger, sadness, fear, and happiness because magic does not work on realistic logic, etc. But when you set limits, you must adhere to these limits, and suddenly magic is no longer magic, but rather science. My look at magic in Harry Potter 1: As the wizard increases in age, his control over his magic increases 2: Magic increases in focus with the wizard’s experience. Example of the difference between Gilderoy Lockhart and Severus Snape. Snape can kill Gilderoy at any time he wants, but Gilderoy can erase Snape’s memory. Why is this? The difference is because Snape is a fighting wizard and Gilderoy is a trickster. Do not forget that Gilderoy erased the memories of many wizards in his mission to become famous, and those wizards are not weak at all. Both Snape and Gilderoy Lockhart are magicians who specialize in a specific field and they excel in their field, although I hate Gilderoy Lockhart. I must admit that he is a master of memory magic. The more experience you have in using a particular magic, the easier and more powerful it becomes. 3: A person’s will differentiates between one person and another, and the will is what makes the magician exert his power on reality. The spell is merely a guideline for the will to apply the power to reality, in a sense. The last magician bends reality according to his desire, but it requires guidance, focus, and will. That's why I don't like the limits you put on magic because a teenager defeated the Dark Lord because his will to protect everything he holds dear is stronger than his opponent. In other words, Harry's power increased at that moment and returned to normal after his victory. This means that the magician's power fluctuates according to the situation.

My friend, my problem is not with the hero of the novel, if he is stupid, then that is part of the novel. My problem is with Professor McGonagall. She is known for her strict adherence to laws and rules, and you're telling me that she accepts the protagonist's request to become a professor in this way. There is a point I forgot to mention. The background of the protagonist is unknown and he is not registered with the British Ministry or any other ministry around the world. In other words, the protagonist does not have identification papers or identity cards. This may not be a problem on a normal day, but when he applies for a job, especially on an education site in a famous school because children are dealt with on this site. Tom Marvelous Riddle was rejected three times because Dumbledore suspected him of being a dark wizard, which is just a suspicion, but the protagonist is completely unknown. If he was a professor teaching Defense Against the Dark Arts, I might accept him because this teaching site is just a decoration that changes every year. I am not telling you to stop writing this novel, but I hope you take into consideration the points I mentioned. The novel is good, and I will continue reading it. Can you make the novel’s hero take his position seriously? The novel’s hero does nothing all week, even though he is supposed to have class every night Per week from the first year to the seventh year.[img=Feeling it]

The heart of the novel is good, but there are holes in its logic. For example, how did he become a professor in astrology without a degree in Owls or Newt? The interview is very bad. The hero of the novel does not know anything about astrology and the magic related to it For example, there are certain potions that cannot be made or used Without the alignment of certain stars on specific days, and the rituals are based on knowledge of the stars and Their orientation , There is a whole branch in interpreting the unseen. And the creature that is famous for its stargazing, like the centaur. This is present in the original story, and the hero of the novel answered that it is useful in only two things: knowing if the student has a talent in divination and reverence, and what is surprising is that he was accepted? ?