Rozumenko_Roman

You complain that the book matches the blurb? My rating for your criticism is 10 empty heads out of 10!

You are absolutely 100% right! Only a person came in and wrote a review of the book about how the main character does nothing. But this is stated in the annotation... If we draw an analogy, it looks like this: you went into a bread store and complained that they only sell bread there. It looks extremely idiotic.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to defend this light novel, but what the hell are you judging the author's work by? "Oh, I don't like something like that. Set 3 stars!" It's unbelievable, really... I think the site should come up with some kind of protection from fools, that is, from self-proclaimed critics. This is outrageous! A review like this makes you want to give this work 5 stars by all criteria, even if it's not true. Just because one "unique" person did the exact opposite, but in the same way - poked a finger at the sky.

Не дождетесь!

"....probably..." And about the “assumption”... - No, this is clearly presented in the text as an (unfounded) statement!

Why?

How does the hero know that improving a skill will increase its duration? Is this immediately indicated in the system? There is also the option of additionally enhancing strength or, for example, additional characteristics in the form of immunity to radiation, chemical-bio weapons, radiation, etc.

58% die during the hunter exam itself...

It's already over... RUN!

Maybe because it's right?