
of reading
1297
Read books
Can’t believe someone knows movies and actors of 1960s Hollywood in such depth. Is the author a grandpa or something? But anyway, for me, only the novel or book plagiarism part was interesting. The movie-making part wasn’t that great because I’m not interested in actors, most of whom are dead or nearly dying.
It’s a derogatory word for Chinese people, but considering the heavy propaganda, nationalism, and brainwashing laid so thick in most webnovels, it starts to feel like the only way to show our dissatisfaction. Like seriously — what is this? “I am going to restore the Ming Dynasty in America.” Yes, that’s an actual webnovel title. And in every story where a Chinese character transmigrates to the West, it’s always like: “Ugh, I can’t live without Chinese food.” “Ugh, so much robbery.” “Ugh, Westerners are so sweaty and smelly.” “I can’t survive without slim, petite, long-legged Eastern beauties.”
Yeah, I use AI — I take my time polishing my reviews so at least one black mark stains the sea of 4-star praise around your AI-polished “masterpiece.” Don’t act tough tossing “fkr”s around, you p*** — I don’t see a single 2- or 1-star review here. Go fool the ones who can’t tell the difference between human writing and the kind of overly dramatic, emotionally dissonant, skin-crawling imbalance your text oozes. There’s a right way to use AI — go take notes from MrPlotThickens; he does it subtly, with skill. When you have that skill, come and reply again — because I won’t be wasting my time on some pitiful fool who, instead of improving his work, defends it like a banshee and still fails miserably, having not made a single solid defense of his writing beyond personal attacks.
I drop comments; you dump AI-buffed drafts and call it writing. Doesn’t matter if it’s fanfiction or charity work — the result’s the same: every scroll through Webnovel is a landfill of overly dramatic slop wrapped in machine polish. If I were doing what you do, I’d keep my head down instead of pretending it’s art.
I don’t need Quillbot to tell me what’s obvious — your drafts reek of that AI makeover gloss. Those detectors aren’t “fake”; they flag the exact writing patterns bots leave behind — smooth, predictable, lifeless, overly dramatic. And those laughing emojis? They don’t hide it, man. Be real for once — admit it and move on.
Says the guy who might be quietly deleting the cold, harsh reviews to keep his AI-polished slop looking “loved.” Nice PR work though — shame it’s still trash.
Ah, so the author crawls out to defend their masterpiece of machine mush. I actually read this long ago — gave up early because it had that unmistakable AI stench: flat dialogue, plastic emotions, overly dramatic rhythm. I stumbled across it again recently, saw the flood of clueless praise, and checked a random paragraph through Quillbot just for fun — over 70% AI-generated. So yeah, your “creative process” looks more like you dumped a rough draft into an AI and called it literature. Don’t get it twisted — I’m not “trolling.” I just don’t worship ChatGPT prose wrapped in fake human pride.
Title of 300 plus chapters'?
Trash
crappy concept