StewartReginald
Writing
of reading
47
Read books
There is no harem element, not my type[img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=strong][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking][img=thinking]
Great novel, enjoyable to read[img=recommend][img=recommend][img=recommend][img=recommend][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it][img=Loving it]
The author's writing skills are not bad, and the plot logic is smooth and smooth, which is already very good in online articles. A slight shortcoming is that the writing is not very strong. A large part of the plot in the article is covered by the narration to explain the description and psychological activities. If these parts can be written with character dialogue instead of these straightforward words, and the personality of each character can be taken into account. The level of this book would be even higher if the dialogue were designed.
Thanks for this chapter[img=recommend][img=recommend][img=recommend]
First of all, this is the best novel I have read. In terms of characters, the author uses a few words to vividly portray the protagonist Clark as a "reborn person" and his understanding of the sinister human nature in the apocalypse (at least in my opinion, don't criticize if you don't like it). In terms of the structure of the article, the sentences are not particularly cumbersome. The descriptions are always concise and clear, but without losing the structural power of the scene, and the description is just right. [img=strong]