Lol. If I was gay, then I'd just accept it, if I was transgender, then I'd just accept it, but I'm not. Literally nothing you've said has hurt my personal feelings at all. Ego or free time? Definitely free time, though you can't really say anything about that considering you're still here too. I thought I made this clear, but I'm not offended or hurt by anything you've said, just calling out your reasoning for your bullshit views. Seriously, you think of being gay as some disease, you compare it to actual bad shit like rape. You have your views, I have mine, sure, but I was just showing that your views make no sense, and in the end are just utterly pathetic. You could say that arguing with your opinion is pointless, and you're right, but it's not anymore pointless than you giving your irrational views on gays. It's just, most people form opinions for good reasons, then there are the rare few like you, who here I am making it clear how illogical and dumb your views are. Who am I to judge your views or whatever? Oh you know, just a random guy on the internet, just like how you'd judge someone for being gay, I'm judging you for being dumb. Was it necessary for me to give my opinion? No. Was it necessary for you to give your opinion? No. Yet it's weird, we both still did. I just called out your opinion as ridiculous.

I've... literally repeated myself like 5 times at this point. You called being gay a sickness, a disease, something against nature itself, for some reason you brought up inbreeding, rape, and pyscopathy. Don't try and act like you were just annoyed over the author calling everyone homophobic if they complained, because your original comment is right below this one. I am literally speechless that you have the ability to lie in this situation when the proof is right there. If you were just annoyed about the author accusing people who complained about the gay stuff homophobic, then I wouldn't have commented, but no, you went off on a rant about how gays were, like I've already repeated myself, sick, a disease, against nature, you compared it to rape, in.cest, and pyscopathy. The only point above that is even remotely viable is the against nature one, but even that, it's not against nature, it's not hurting or damaging anything related to nature, it's just not following the instincts to reproduce, which with a population that is way too high, is literally a good thing at this point. Stop downplaying and lying about what you said to make yourself seem right, if you're gonna give your stupid views on gays, then at least own up to your own words.

Being a keyboard justice warrior? There's no justice to be had, your reasoning was just dumb, such extreme views you brought up for no reason, not to mention, it's easy to sound emotional online, when in reality I didn't care at all, it's not like this conversation means anything after all. As for the video.. I don't.. So there's no 'gay' gene? Are you trying to say being gay doesn't exist or something? Or are u trying to say it's because gays are, I don't know, just wrong about their feelings? Maybe, just maybe, it's not a gene that describes somebody's feelings or attraction. I believe in science completely, but even I know that this study doesn't mean anything worthwhile.

As for thick skin.. I mean, it's the other way around here. Your views are straight up retarded with no good reasoning behind them, while I have backed up all of my reasoning with you know.. actual reasons. I was laughing at how dumb you were sounding when you were going on about trying to make sure the new generations don't contract the gay or whatever, but the fact you're calling me the one with the thick skin just makes it even funnier.

I'm not butthurt? Like I don't really care, I just have incessant need to call out people on their bullshit. It's a pretty big flaw of mine, and if you really were busy you'd just not have responded in the first place. In the end I just don't care, idiots will be idiots, that's just a part of life I guess.

Of course I liked my own comments, do you not? You have the ability to do it for a reason.

Playing with shit? Definitely disgusting, don't know why ur coming up with this, but you also brought up shit like being a pyschopath and rape and tried comparing it to being gay. You don't like seeing something gay? Fine, it's your opinion, but you're bringing it to levels that are fucking ridiculous. Brainwashed from Netflix shows? .. I'm just not even gonna try. In the end, if you don't like something gay, then fine, who cares, but you don't even think of it as just some weird fetish, you straight up call it a sickness, acting like it should be cured and how we need to teach kids that being gay is disgusting and wrong. Smh, if you think people are gay just because of the way they're brought up, then you're beyond stupid. It's not just humans who've been known to be gay after all. This.. conversation.. is obviously not gonna go anywhere, you're just gonna keep thinking of it as some sort of contracted sickness. lol, 'Help Doctor, my son, he's caught the gay! Please, save him before he gets taken by the devil!'. Don't need a reason for disliking something? Sure, if you dislike brocolli, who am I to say otherwise.. But like I've said multiple times, you call being gay a sickness, as if it can be cured, you compare it to rape, inbreeding and psychopathy with the only reason being you don't like it, or to put it in simpler terms, ur a fuckin idiot.

5?! He did this at 5?! You know what, I'm not even gonna go there. The points been made.

Again, not overly complicating things, you just refuse to give a reason why it's wrong. You say 'just read my previous comments' but that's the reason I even commented, you compared being gay to a sickness, you brought up psychopaths and rape comparable to being gay, not me. Also, again, you're adding unrelated points. It's like, 'gay *** is wrong unless you support inbreeding, but straight *** is right because.. um.. it just is.' Stop comparing being gay to inbreeding, they're not the same at all. Also, what are you on about, 'oh as long as they don't reproduce then having *** with your family is fine, right?', what the **** are you on about? So gay *** is wrong because you can't reproduce, and therefore somehow comparable to inbreeding, but straight *** is fine. By your logic, the only reason for someone to have *** is to reproduce, otherwise it's like inbreeding or something. Gay and ****** aren't even remotely related, yet you're trying to compare them to each other. Like what if I make the point of straight ****** being fine as long as you don't reproduce? Does that suddenly make it fine? I mean it doesn't conform to your irrational hatred of being gay so it's just fine, right? See how stupid that sounds? I guess I should have expected it from the stupid comments I saw earlier, but you have no good points other than you hate it because it's just wrong in your eyes. Reason why I called it childish? Because there are many adults who learn to think from another perspective after growing up, unfortunately, you seem to have still not unlocked that ability just yet.

I did not say only kids and teenagers hate gay things or whatever, I said 'hating' something as harmless as being gay is just stupid, and in the end adults are usually far more accepting of it than kids. Stop bringing unrelated things into it, inbreeding causes genetic defects to the children, of course it's wrong, being gay causes no harm, simple as that. You keep saying you hate gays, but I feel like you don't know what the word hate means because you keep switching your descriptions. Yes, male and female's are different for a reason, but it's just like.. Other than reproduction, what is the difference? It quite simply doesn't matter. Your views are just so stupid. Like I asked before, can you give me one sufficient reason why being gay is so wrong? I can understand being uncomfortable with it, if I see something gay, I'm immediately turned off, but that's just me, I am not dumb enough to believe that just because I don't like something then nobody else does. Your views are so extreme. You hate gays, then you'll beat them up, then you don't care, then you're just uncomfortable, pick one. You compared being gay to a sickness, like being a pyschpath, you even brought rape into it, and it's just ridiculous.

Of course, you don't care if someone is gay, but you hate gay people.. Sure.. Give a reason why it's right? Well because there's nothing wrong with it. Nobody's being hurt, are they? You'd beat the shit out of a gay person if they flirted with you? Well I mean.. that just shows what type of person you are, a shit one. I am 100% straight, not interested in gay stuff at all, but if someone is gay I don't start saying it's a mental illness like being a pyschopath or rape or whatever. I mean, give me an actual, solid reason why being gay is this disgusting disease that you've made it out to be? Rape is a disgusting thing that traumatizes people and even leads to suicide, being gay causes no harm to anybody. I used to say being gay is unnatural and just against biology in general, but in the end I grew up and realized it doesn't even matter. That's why I think you're some 15 year old, because it's far more likely to think like you at that age rather than as an *****, it's not me trying to insult you about 'hehe you're just a kid' but just a natural conclusion to your views. When I said you were narrow minded, I wasn't being some self-righteous, holier than thou saint who is completely open minded, I was saying that your views are just so.. childish. 'Being gay is a sickness, a mental Illness, like being a pyschopath'. It's only the idiot's who keep these views as adults and put so much care into gender, but meh whatever, I'm not trying to cause unnecessary conflict, it's just funny how passionate you are about something so utterly unimportant. Some people are gay, get over it.

I don't think I was ever this extreme, but a few years ago I was definitely homophobic. Now, I just shake my head at my narrow-mindedness. It would take like 5 paragraphs of facts and explanations to explain my point and with how narrow-minded I can see you are when it comes to this stuff (I can tell cuz I used to be the same) you just won't listen even if I do explain. In the end, it doesn't matter, you can think whatever you want, I just gave my useless opinion like you did yours, though I do wonder if maybe in a few years you'll grow up and see that it really doesn't matter if people are gay or not, or maybe you'll be homophobic for the rest of your life, who knows, but damn, if you're not in high school and are either an ***** or in college, then I kinda feel bad that you're so.. well the only word I can think of is narrow-minded, even at that age.

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Exp.

I think of it this way. Yes, he could have done even worse things to her, yes it was horrible but 'just sucking', but people are making excuses for it. There isn't one. Saiyans are heartless bastards or whatever? That just means they don't care, it's not a reason for this shit, also people like to say law of the jungle? This is the thing, the MC was raised in our world and in konoha. He knows better, yet did it anyway. If people are fine with it and defend it, then fine, but they can at least admit that they're pathetic. Like that other guy said 'It's not really rape', trying saying that to your mother or sister, it wouldn't go down well.

I didn't mean he chose Tom as a new name, and I am well aware that his canon name is Tom, I meant that he could have shortened it when making his Voldemort name. This has been stated to be AU, making things not canon is sorta the point, oh don't get me wrong I know that the name and eye color was a mistake instead of deliberately AU, but, again, they're small details that don't make much of a difference. You said that it obviously can't be good because of reasons that don'r mean anything to the story. Oh I'm sure, like most fanfics on this site, that this isn't very good, but your reasons for saying it isn't just suck.

I don't agree with the way the author handled it but it really is only small details, especially for an AU fanfic where things are supposed to be different. Voldemort lied about his blood status, what's there stopping him from lying about his name as Tom so that the anagram of 'I Am Lord Voldemort' still works? You said the fic obviously can't be good because of an eye color and slightly different name which is just plain stupid. I'm not calling this fic good, I haven't even read it, but honestly these are knit-picked details that really don't matter in the end.

sdfdsjmodnjvvbcxkvcvpoindsdoiidnbodffjcvl;kmaso;kjnnfdgijncipcvbu hnesdfipdndsipn[osddndsvkjddsdo[nffiosdnofidngbadsonvbbsdefpokdxfmbdszoimfcond

Exp